All quiet on China front, no new threat: ITBP chief

[Chinese-Dragon]

But the fact is we are more prepared than you know this time....

Oh really?

'India cannot match China's military force': Indian Naval Chief - IBNLive

New Delhi: Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Sureesh Mehta has set off a storm by saying India cannot match China military force. Is it a warning from India's military that the government needs to hear?

"In military terms, both conventional and non-conventional, we neither have the capability nor the intention to match China force for force," said Admiral Sureesh Mehta.

For a nuclear-armed military representing the interests of a billion-plus people, the lack of confidence is quite striking. India's military leadership has made a stunning confession that New Delhi doesn't have the stomach for a fight, if push came to shove on the disputed Sino-Indian boundary.

"Whether in terms of GDP, defence spend or any other parameter, the gap between the two is too wide to bridge and is getting wider by the day," he said.

Don't tell me that you know more than the Indian Armed forces themselves.

 

[kaykay]

Oh really?

'India cannot match China's military force': Indian Naval Chief - IBNLive


Don't tell me that you know more than the Indian Armed forces themselves.

And here you come with India's offensive capabilities compare to China i.e.one on one...but when it comes to defence we know how to do that let it be China or more than China.

 

[Omega007]

Oh really?

'India cannot match China's military force': Indian Naval Chief - IBNLive



Don't tell me that you know more than the Indian Armed forces themselves.

How many times more you will post this link??Aren't you bored??

 

[Ganges Zephyr]

How many times more you will post this link??Aren't you bored??

When he gets bored with this link, next is "India cannot respond to Mumbai attacks"

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

How many times more you will post this link??Aren't you bored??

How many times will Indians boast about being able to take on China?

I am giving them a dose of reality, with words straight from their own Armed forces.

First accept reality, then maybe I won't have to post this link.

 

[LaBong]

Oh really?

'India cannot match China's military force': Indian Naval Chief - IBNLive



Don't tell me that you know more than the Indian Armed forces themselves.

"In military terms, both conventional and non-conventional, we neither have the capability nor the intention to match China force for force," said Admiral Sureesh Mehta.

Why do we need to match China force by force, Agni 5 is enough to deter China from any misadventure. You want South Tibet, ok come and get it and see Beijing to go kaboom!

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Why do we need to match China force by force, Agni 5 is enough to deter China from any misadventure. You want South Tibet, ok come and get it and see Beijing to go kaboom!

Hahaha, and you Indian members always complain that Pakistanis are quick to jump to the nuclear option. You guys do it even faster.

You should have read the Naval Chief's comments more closely: ""In military terms, both conventional and non-conventional, we neither have the capability nor the intention to match China".

294 megatons vs 1 megaton... it's not even a competition. And your own Armed forces know it.

 

[LaBong]

Hahaha, and you Indian members always complain that Pakistanis are quick to jump to the nuclear option. You guys do it even faster.

You should have read the Naval Chief's comments more closely: ""In military terms, both conventional and non-conventional, we neither have the capability nor the intention to match China".

294 megatons vs 1 megaton... it's not even a competition. And your own Armed forces know it.

I'm sure CPC knows better than you! ;-)

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

I'm sure CPC knows better than you! ;-)

Yes they do, which is why they put troops in Northern Pakistan.

P.S. We already took Arunachal Pradesh in 1962, and then we gave it back to you.

 

[CardSharp]

I'm sure CPC knows better than you! ;-)

And the respected international non-proliferation scientists know better than you. Fing noobs always default to the same petty defence.

Jeffrey Lewis; India's H Bomb Revisited aka India’s H-bomb fizzled. And mind you this wasn't even a test of a deliverable weapon, they needed a crane to haul it around.

Looking at this thread there is very little doubt which side want a war, let's hope your leaders are less suicidal.

 

[kaykay]

Yes they do, which is why they put troops in Northern Pakistan.

P.S. We already took Arunachal Pradesh in 1962, and then we gave it back to you.

And you think China had given it just like that even after they claimed it to be their's......and by the way this is not 1962 anymore.

 

[CardSharp]

And you think China had given it just like that even after they claimed it to be their's......and by the way this is not 1962 anymore.

The Chinese position has always been that any permanent border will only be peaceful and sustainable if it is established through negotiation, not force. This is why China withdraw after a crushing victory. Zhou Enlai right after the 62' war said that the door to a negotiated border will be always open to India, it's just that no Indian politician has had the balls to take up any serious negotiation for fear of being crucified by angry ignorant war-mongering mob at home.

A negotiated border will come when the Indian government releases Brook-Henderson-Bagat report and give an official history of the war that will debunk "China betrayed us" myth floated by post Nehru academics.

 

[LaBong]

And the respected international non-proliferation scientists know better than you. Fing noobs always default to the same petty defence.

Jeffrey Lewis; India's H Bomb Revisited aka India’s H-bomb fizzled. And mind you this wasn't even a test of a deliverable weapon, they needed a crane to haul it around.

Looking at this thread there is very little doubt which side want a war, let's hope your leaders are less suicidal.

Haven't I already busted your claim a long time ago, lets not do that same exercise yet again.

 

[CardSharp]

Haven't I already busted your claim a long time ago, lets not do that same exercise yet again.

You didn't, but if you have actually had an argument, I'm sure the scientists on the non-proliferation blog would like hear it. (hope you do better than the Indian scientists there spouting gibberish and getting laughed at)

 

[LaBong]

Yes they do, which is why they put troops in Northern Pakistan.

P.S. We already took Arunachal Pradesh in 1962, and then we gave it back to you.

Gave it back to us, hahaha

---------- Post added at 01:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:32 PM ----------

You didn't, but if you have actually had an argument, I'm sure the scientists on the non-proliferation blog would like hear it. (hope you do better than the Indian scientists there spouting gibberish and getting laughed at)

I'd rather believe our national security adviser than what some random blog has to say.