I wish you were dear.
All that is about the insurgency, support of terrorist elements. The claims being made now are of help for Baluchi people which are denounced by Balochistan population anyway. Dont mix up the two things as that is when the views get twisted dear.
oh come on, dont flatter yourself. The gov is doing enough of that already. The mention of Baluchistan was simply to try and deviate the attention from that Kashmir mess up, a poor attempt at that really judging by the intial reaction. Seriously, you did way better than this in 71, you expecting the same with some pics of masked men in rajistan? lolz. it is not paranoi dear, the chatter you hear are people laughing at these ridicilious attemp of cover up and now, poking and provoking GoI further and they are taking the bait.
lack of confidence? seriously? well if we talk about it you call it paranoi, if we ignore it you call it lack of confidence?
plus trust me, no one, and i mean NO ONE will forget kashmir because you talked about Baluchistan. You think the world is fool enough to even remotely compare an issue that is source of wars between two nuclear states with something that is not related at all!! no dear it is not. Frankly, India and Indains are not this idiot either. Most of your own have realized it already and ithers will do the same in time.
till then, we are having fun here.
I am dear .
Support is there and GoP and Sartaj Aziz claimed that they will submit evidences to UN.Where is that my friend ?
Till now we didnt see anything .
Recently Pak establishment found an Indian 'spy' but still they are not able to bring the evidences to UN?Why?
Pakistan and their full media ,govt politicians accused India fir Balochistan even before this issue .
What was you NSA response after Red Fort Speech?
We dont have to ,we are talking about a problematic area ,not some first world country side.
If we want a problem in there then it would be appear in there ,we have resources and facilities to do that .But that will cause problems to our friendly nation.
So what he pointed in that speech is that Pakistan should control the HR violations in Balochistan .He didnt mention about separatism or support ,only pointed about HR in there .
What would be the response of a self confident nation when another nation's leader says something like this ?
Just ignore it with a strong language and all will end there .
But we are seeing something different here .Am I Right ?