AgNoStiC MuSliM
ADVISORS
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 25,259
- Reaction score
- 87
- Country
- Location
With respect, I disagree with your concerns. Consider the following:That was at first---now I am getting concerned---. Had time to analyze---.
Nawaz Sharif is gone to england----Alice Wells speech comes out at a critical time---.
The Sharifs are ready to sell pakistan one more time---.
If Zardari is let go---then Zardaris would be selling pakistan as well.
Bad bad mistake by Imran Khan letting Nawaz go---.
When the PTI came to power, there were a lot of reports sourced from within the PTI that Imran Khan was not happy with the enormous amounts of debt taken on for various CPEC projects. IK wasn't happy about the massive investments in coal based power plants on principle because of his own commitment to renewable energy & the environment. There were reports of tensions between Pakistan and China over the Chinese concern that the PTI would backtrack on various CPEC projects. Eventually, the PTI government clarified that all commitments under CPEC would be adhered to - there wasn't really much of a choice because commitments had been made under the PMLN government and China is a strong ally of Pakistan that we did not want to alienate.
Now, look at the current situation with respect to CPEC - various statements from the PTI leadership have spoken of a 'shift in CPEC focus' towards agriculture, technology, industry etc. Khan wants to invest in broader social development through a focus on increasing agricultural, industrial and export output. Most of the projects that'll come under these headings will be significantly smaller in terms of the dollar value (compared to motorways, power plants, ports etc). In addition, Khan's focus is on reforming domestic institutions, reducing Pakistan's debt & increasing revenues. All of this actually aligns with US objectives (at least as stated officially by the State Department). Note also the many references in Alice Well's speech to 'Imran Khan's reform agenda' & the impact on that reform agenda due to 'CPEC debt'.
The PTI is, in terms of US concerns over CPEC/OBOR investments, more aligned with US goals/preferences than the PMLN government was. Most of the massive CPEC/OBOR projects in Pakistan were conceived and signed during the PMLN government, and the US knows there is little the PTI government can do violate those commitments with China. So I don't see the PMLN or Nawaz Sharif as being more attractive to the US from the perspective of limiting China's OBOR investments in Pakistan. Sharif has always had this attraction to mega-infrastructure projects without a parallel focus on improving government and domestic private sector capacity to take advantage of such mega-projects in boosting industrial growth and revenues. A Sharif government would likely resort to the same kinds of policies as before to show 'quick economic growth' by taking on more debt for mega-projects.
What's left is your concern about the PPP/Zardari - I don't see the PPP as a viable option (as a partner) for the US. The PPP, for the foreseeable future, is unlikely to win enough seats from Punjab to form a government at the Center - it's pretty much been wiped out of Punjab over the last two national elections and the media coverage of its mismanagement in Sindh isn't winning it any new supporters.
Now my disagreement with you, on the US leveraging the PMLN or PPP against the PTI, is solely in the context of US concerns over the CPEC/OBOR initiative. I'm not considering the impact of other dynamics such as Afghanistan (where IK's engagement & diplomacy in getting the Taliban to engage with the US actually works in the PTI's favor) or the US's desire to boost India as a counter to China, or US concerns over Pakistan's nuclear program etc.
Last edited: