Akbaruddin Owaisi to PM Modi: 'This country is not your father's property'

[Lotus_stalk]

Akbaruddin Owaisi to PM Modi: 'This country is not your father's property'
"People of VHP and Bajrang Dal, Narendra Modi listen: This country is not your father's property," Akbaruddin Owaisi, floor leader of AIMIM in the Telangana assembly said. He further added, "This country belongs to me as much as it belongs to you."
By News Nation Bureau | Updated On : July 03, 2017 07:25 PM

Akbaruddin Owaisi attacks PM Modi


New Delhi :
All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) legislator Akbaruddin Owaisi made some shocking statements during a speech on Monday.The younger Owaisi, who's known for his provocative speeches alleged that Parliament and assemblies pass laws against Muslims.

Akbaruddin, floor leader of AIMIM in the Telangana assembly, also used offensive language against Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his speech.

"People of VHP and Bajrang Dal, Narendra Modi listen: This country is not your father's property," he said. "This country belongs to me as much as it belongs to you," he further added.

He called for unity of Muslims and said his brother Asaduddin Owaisi, MP and National President of AIMIM, can win enough votes to increase the presence of Muslims in Parliament, and consequently ensure laws are made that can give them their rights.

ALSO READ: Asaduddin Owaisi dares Amit Shah to contest from Hyderabad seat

“The laws that destroy Muslims are not made on roads, marketplaces or grounds but in Parliament, Assemblies and municipalities. If Muslims want and if they all come together then we will not need anybody’s mercy or help or actions. Our brother himself with his vote can win India’s 50 Parliament seats,” Owaisi said in a video footage.

READ: PM’s statement on cow vigilantism was mere lip service, says Owaisi

The controversial leader had in the past spent 40 days in jail in a case registered against him for hate speech at an election rally.
http://www.newsnation.in/india-news...arliament-against-muslims-article-175959.html

 

[salimpheku]

Owaisi is still thinking India is under Mughal rule.

This SOB is alive today because of Hindus and he is spewing venom against us. Goes to know, ain't it.

 

[Lotus_stalk]

Sometimes progeny may exceed their father and take over more property(eg India)... God creates opportunity in many forms eg God sent British to Indian Subcontinent as an opportunity...

If Ahmad Shah Durrani was an oppoutunity:

Shah Waliullah (a hero of Deobandi and Takfiri clerics) wrote letters to Ahmad Shah Durrani (or Ahmad Shah Abdali, a hero of many Deobandi Pashtuns) to come and kill both Hindu Marhattas (Marathas) and Shia Muslims in Delhi. (Reference: Sayyid Athar Abbas Rizvi, ‘Shah Waliullah and his times’, Ma’rifat publishing house 1980, page 306).

By the end of 1759, Ahmad Shah Abdali with his Afghan tribes and his Rohilla ally Najib Khan had reached Lahore as well as Delhi and defeated the smaller enemy garrisons. Many Shias and Hindu Marathas were killed in Delhi by the Durrani’s army.
https://lubpak.com/archives/306269

What's wrong in British being an opportunity? I see many calling RSS a dalal of British...

 

[turbofan7a]

This is the idiot who had an heartatack when he heard that the police was going to arrest him!

 

[Gadkari]

He is just doing what the other muslims are doing in pdf.

He knows that abusing Modi is the surest way to get muslim votes .......... people get the leader they deserve, so maybe they deserve him.

 

[Lotus_stalk]

History tells us that Ahmad Shah Durrani massacred thousands of Shia Muslims and Hindus in Kashmir because of local Sunni/Salafi population’s invitation to him to help them undermine the Shia rulers (remanant of Chak dynasty) and Shia population. In middle of the 18th century, when the Mughal Empire had begun its decline, a few Sunni/Salafi Muslim Kashmiri nobles invited Ahmed Shah Abdali, the brutal semi-Salafi ruler of Afghanistan, to liberate their country. Pathans/Pashtuns, like Moghals obliged and over ran Kashmir in 1752. In order to maintain their stranglehold over Kashmir, Abdali’s satraps not only doubled taxes of their impoverished subjects but specifically persecuted the Shia minority with a fanatical vigour as they saw in them a perpetual threat for their puritanical Salafi/Sunni beliefs. Fifty years of Afghan rule were rife with suppression and massacres of Shia Muslims. With Kashgari sowing the seeds of hatred among the Muslim community for political ends Shia’s in Kashmir in subsequent years had to pass through the most atrocious period of their history. Plunder, loot and massacres which came to be known as ‘Taarajs’ virtually devastated the community.

History records 10 such Taarajs also known as ‘Taraj-e-Shia’ in 1548, 1585, 1635, 1686, 1719, 1741, 1762, 1801, 1830, 1872 during which the Shia habitations were plundered, people slaughtered, libraries burnt and their sacred sites desecrated. Such was the reign of terror during this period that the community widely went into the practice of Taqya (temporary or permanent conversion to Sunni sect) in order to preserve their lives and the honour of their womenfolk. Village after village disappeared, with community members either migrating to safety further north or dissolving in the majority faith. The community has yet to recover fully from the shocks of these Taarajs, the last one suffered more than a century ago, and the fear of hidden lurking dangers continues to haunt it to date.(http://edition.presstv.ir/detail.fa/278797.html and http://kashmirobserver.net/news/features/shias-kashmir-socio-political-dilemmas)

Evidence of beheadings of Hindus, Sikhs and Shias by Pashtun Salafist ruler Ahmad Shah Durrani Abadali and his invading thugs. And this happened much before the Saudi, USA, Punjabi establishment’s Deobandi Jihad project in Pashtun areas. History is crue; denial and abuses are the only escape for insecure nationalists.

In his letter to Ahmad Shah Durrani/Abdali, Shah Waliullah advised him for “orders prohibiting Holi and Muharram festivals should be issued” exposed his hostility towards both Hindus and Shias. (Shah Wali Allah and his times by Saiyid Athar Abbas Rizvi, 1980, pp. 209-304)

Ahmed Shah Durrani is also notorious for holocaust of Sikhs in Punjab. When Ahmad Shah Durrani returned for a sixth campaign of conquest (his fifth being in 1759-61), tens of thousands of Sikhs including women and children were mercilessly slaughtered by his forces. In the twilight of dawn, Durrani and his allies surprised the Sikhs, who numbered about 50,000, most of them noncombatants. It was decided that the Sikh fighters would form a cordon around the slow-moving baggage train consisting of women, children and old men. They would then make their way to the desert in the south-west by the town of Barnala, where they expected their ally Alha Singh of Patiala to come to their rescue. An eye witness account describes the Sikhs. “Fighting while moving and moving while fighting, they kept the baggage train marching, covering it as a hen covers its chicks under its wings.” More than once, the troops of the invader broke the cordon and mercilessly butchered the women, children and elderly inside, but each time the Sikh warriors regrouped and managed to push back the attackers. By early afternoon, the large fighting cavalcade reached a big pond, the first they had come across since morning. Suddenly the bloodletting ceased as the two forces, man and beast, resorted to the water to quench their thirst and relax their tired limbs. From that point on, the two forces went their separate ways. The Afghan forces, who had inflicted terrible human losses on the Sikh nation, and had in turn suffered many killed and wounded, were exhausted, having not had any rest in two days. While the living remainder of the Sikhs proceeded into the semi-desert toward Barnala, Ahmad Shah Durrani’s army returned to the capital of Lahore with hundreds of Sikhs in chains. From the capital, Durrani returned to Amritsar and blew up the Harimandir Sahib which since 1757 the Sikhs had rebuilt. As an act of intended sacrilege, the pool around it was filled with cow carcasses It was estimated that 25,000 to 30,000 Sikhs were killed on that horrific day of 5 February 1762. As it is doubtful their entire population would have numbered 100,000, it means one third to a half of all Sikhs perished. The Sikhs were not the only people who were targeted.

(Sardar Singh Bhatia, “Vadda Ghallughara”, The Encyclopedia of Sikhism, Volume IV, Patiala, Punjabi University, 1998; Syad Muhammad Latif, The History of Punjab from the Remotest Antiquity to the Present Time, New Delhi, Eurasia Publishing House (Pvt.) Ltd., 1964, p. 283; Khushwant Singh, A History of the Sikhs, Volume I: 1469-1839, Delhi, Oxford University Press, 1978; Khushwant Singh, A History of the Sikhs, Volume I: 1469-1839, Delhi, Oxford University Press, 1978, p. 154-55; Sardar Singh Bhatia, “Vadda Ghallughara”, The Encyclopedia of Sikhism, Volume IV, Patiala, Punjabi University, 1998, pp. 396; Syad Muhammad Latif, The History of Punjab from the Remotest Antiquity to the Present Time, New Delhi, Eurasia Publishing House (Pvt.) Ltd., 1964, p. 283.)

 

[EndangeredSpecies]

Its a political speech. He is trying to look like a underdog in front of Modi -- a rebellious underdog. Such a facade evokes sympathy by proxy. Or a vicarious feeling of rebel latent in minorities. Votes come naturally from that.

 

[Lotus_stalk]

Noted historian Dr. Tara Chand remarks:

“He (Wali Ullah) appealed to Najib-ud-Daulah, Nizamul Mulk and Ahmad Shah Abdali – all three the upholders of condemned system – to intervene and restore the pristine glory of Islam. It is amazing that he should have placed his trust in Ahmad Shah Abdali, who had ravaged the fairest provinces of the Mogul empire, had plundered the Hindus and Muslims without the slightest compunction and above all, who was an upstart without any root among his own people” (History of the Freedom Movement of India, volume I, 1970, page 180).

Even though the defeat of Hindu Marathas by Abdali could not halt the sliding decline of Mogul Empire, it made Wali Ullah the hero of Indian Muslims and he emerged as main inspiring force for Muslim politics in this country. His Islamic thought was regarded as saviour of the faith and its impact left a deep imprint on Indian Muslim psyche, which continues to inspire them even today. Almost all the Muslim organisations in this country directly or indirectly draw their political inspiration from Wali Ullah.

Wali Ullah died in 1762 but his son Abd al Aziz (1746-1823) carried his mission as a result India faced violent communal disorder for decades. Considering Indian subcontinent no longer Dar-ul-Islam (A land, where Islam is having political power) and British rule as Dar ul-Harb (A land, where Islam is deprived of its political authority), he laid emphasis on jehadi spirit of the faith. Saiyid Ahmad (1786-1831) of Rai Bareli a trusted Salafist disciple of Abd al Aziz launched jehad on the Sikh kingdom but got defeated and killed in battle of Balkot in May 1831. Tired with their failures in re-establishing Muslim rule the followers of Wali Ullah preferred to keep their movement in suspended animation for decades, when the Britishers established their firm grip on this country.

The Sepoy mutiny of 1857 was a turning point in the history of Islamic fundamentalism in India. With its failure Indian Muslims lost all hopes to restore Muslim power in India.(Many Hindus took advantage of this opputunity, this is why RSS is called a traitor by different muslim org.) But successive Ulama in their attempt to keep the movement alive turned towards institutionalised Islamic movement. Some prominent followers of Salfi/Wahhabi movement like Muhammad Qasim Nanutvi and Rashid Ahmad Gangohi drew furter inspiration from the religio-political concept of Waliullah and set up an Islamic Madrassa at Deoband in U.P. on May 30, 1866, which grew into a higher Islamic learning centre and assumed the present name of Dar-ul-Uloom (Abode of Islamic learning) in 1879. Since then, Dar-ul-Uloom, which is more a movement than an institution has been carrying the puritanical tradition of Shah Waliullah and is a semi-Salafi/Wahabi movement inspired by Saudi Salafis.

His insistence for not diluting the cultural identity of Arab in a Hindu-majority environment shows that his so-called reform of Islam was only for a political motive. His obsession to extreme Sunnism, modern Deobandism/Wahabism, is welll known.

Contrary to his projected image of a reformer, Wali Ullah like other militant group of Islamic intellectuals did not appreciate any cultural and social reconciliation with non-Muslims in an integrated society. His communal bias against the political rise of non-Muslim powers like Maratha, Jat and Sikh goes against the theory that Wali Ullah was a Muslim thinker for Islamic moderation. His exclusivist theory favouring political domination of his community all over the world with starting point in India vindicates this point. In the background of his hate-Hindu political move, Wali Ullah may not stand the scrutiny of being a Muslim thinker for rational evaluation of Islam and its moderation.

Combination of Deobandi and Salafi/Wahabi extremism and religio-political strategy of Wali Ullah has become the main source of inspiration for Islamic terrorism as we see today in Pakistan, Afghanistan and India. So long the Muslim leaders and intellectuals do not come forward and re-evaluate the eighteenth century old interpretation of faith (Deobandi and Salafi ideology), any remedy for resolution of on going emotional disorder in society is a remote possibility. It is the social obligation of intellectuals to bluntly identify and confront the Deobandi and Salafi roots of terroism and awaken the moral and economic strength of entire society without any religious or sectarian prejudice.

http://saag.org/paper629

According to Khaled Ahmed, Shah Waliullah urged Ahmad Shah Durrani (Abdali) to invade India to save Muslims from Hindus and Shias.



The three conditions that Sayyid Ahmad and the Deobandi Taliban fulfill are: fighting enemy number one (the British, the Americans) through a secondary enemy (the Sikhs, Pakistan); mixing local Islam with hardline Arab Islam; and using the tribal order as matrix of Islam. The Taliban derive their radical Islam from the Wahhabi severity of the money-distributing Arabs; the mujahideen of Sayyid Ahmad derived their puritanism from Shah Waliullah’s ‘contact’ with the Arabs in Hijaz in 1730.

In the battle of Balakot, Sikh commander Sher Singh finally overwhelmed Sayyid Ahmad after he was informed about his hideout by his Pashtun allies. Ahmad fought bravely but was soon cut down. To prevent a tomb from being erected on his corpse, the Sikhs cut him to pieces but ‘an old woman found the Sayyid’s severed head which was later buried in the place considered to be his tomb’ (p.105).

Ayesha Jalal notes that in the battlefield of Balakot, where Sayyid Ahmad of Rai Bareilly (not to be confused with Barelvi/Sufi sect of Sunni Islam) was martyred in 1831, another kind of ‘cross-border’ deniable jihad is being carried out by other mujahideen. She writes: ‘To this day Balakot where the Sayyid lies buried is a spot that has been greatly revered, not only by militants in contemporary Pakistan, some of whom have set up training camps near Balakot, but also by anti-colonial nationalists who interpreted the movement as a prelude to a jihad against the British in India’ (p.61).


At the end of the day few are idealist, many are practical and self serving...

Mangal Panday and Rani Laxmi bai where heroes but they were selectively propped up for politics during 1857 revolt.

At the end of the day:
Hindus don't see British in the same light as muslims, just as muslims don't see Pakistan in the same light as Hindus... And Hindus don't see Israel in the same light as muslims...

 

[Fireurimagination]

The elder brother preaches secularism to everyone on various TV channels and the younger brother is a rabid communal person!

 

[Gadkari]

The elder brother preaches secularism to everyone on various TV channels and the younger brother is a rabid communal person!

Did the elder brother allow the construction of Ram temple in Ram Janmabhoomi in the name of "secularism" ?

A least let him prove his credentials before you give him a label.

 

[jetray]

The elder brother preaches secularism to everyone on various TV channels and the younger brother is a rabid communal person!

he is an asshole of highest order, still living in medieval century where he thinks he is the nawab. Has cultivated a captive communal electorate which keeps electing him on basis of his religion.

 

[footmarks]

His photo with him sitting on a wheelchair with wet pyjama (he peed in his pyjama), when police came to arrest him is still viral on social media. poor pug...

 

[Fireurimagination]

Did the elder brother allow the construction of Ram temple in Ram Janmabhoomi in the name of "secularism" ?

A least let him prove his credentials before you give him a label.

The elder brother only preaches secularism to others namely Hindus, he himself is no better than his younger sibling. Below the wrapper the products are same.

 

[Kaushika]

Blame this on south Indians who are tolarating this swine. If he have balls he should visit North West balls in India. :/

 

[Max]

Akbaruddin Owaisi to PM Modi: 'This country is not your father's property'
"People of VHP and Bajrang Dal, Narendra Modi listen: This country is not your father's property," Akbaruddin Owaisi, floor leader of AIMIM in the Telangana assembly said. He further added, "This country belongs to me as much as it belongs to you."
By News Nation Bureau | Updated On : July 03, 2017 07:25 PM

Akbaruddin Owaisi attacks PM Modi


New Delhi :
All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) legislator Akbaruddin Owaisi made some shocking statements during a speech on Monday.The younger Owaisi, who's known for his provocative speeches alleged that Parliament and assemblies pass laws against Muslims.

Akbaruddin, floor leader of AIMIM in the Telangana assembly, also used offensive language against Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his speech.

"People of VHP and Bajrang Dal, Narendra Modi listen: This country is not your father's property," he said. "This country belongs to me as much as it belongs to you," he further added.

He called for unity of Muslims and said his brother Asaduddin Owaisi, MP and National President of AIMIM, can win enough votes to increase the presence of Muslims in Parliament, and consequently ensure laws are made that can give them their rights.

ALSO READ: Asaduddin Owaisi dares Amit Shah to contest from Hyderabad seat

“The laws that destroy Muslims are not made on roads, marketplaces or grounds but in Parliament, Assemblies and municipalities. If Muslims want and if they all come together then we will not need anybody’s mercy or help or actions. Our brother himself with his vote can win India’s 50 Parliament seats,” Owaisi said in a video footage.

READ: PM’s statement on cow vigilantism was mere lip service, says Owaisi

The controversial leader had in the past spent 40 days in jail in a case registered against him for hate speech at an election rally.
http://www.newsnation.in/india-news...arliament-against-muslims-article-175959.html

He can whine as much he want, the position of Muslims will not change until they are scattered all over bharat, northern bharati Muslims should migrate to south where Muslim are living in harmony and establish their political base there.

Blame this on south Indians who are tolarating this swine. If he have balls he should visit North West balls in India. :/

Whats wrong in his statement? he said bharat belong to him as much to Modi? is it blasphemy in bharat?