'Akash' missile successfully test-fired again Today.

[AUz]

sorry to ask if its of-topic... "Babur Missile" name cam from

Babar Khan Ghauri Babar Khan Ghauri - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

or Babur Babur - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (he was from Uzbekistan as wiki says.) then why to name one of your most potent Missile on the name of person of different origin. Whyn't someone from Pakistan?

mm well its symbolic. Babur destroyed Indian forces in its battles against them ....


Babur -----> Indian Forces of today ...

Hope you get the symbolism here ...

Akash can very well defend against such missiles, the target pilotless drone PTA lakshya travels at 0.72 Mach 15 to 25 meters above sea level, which can sucessfully simulate the aforementioned cruise missile which is marginally faster than the PTA Lakshya. Akash is utilizes an integrated ramjet-rocket propulsion system capable of thrust throughput the flight at 25 Mach and 15G maneuverability.

Was Lakshya flying 50 metres above the ground? Was it employing "radar evading" technology? Was Lakshya using TERCOM as its guidance system?

 

[Water Car Engineer]

mm well its symbolic. Babur destroyed Indian forces in its battles against them ....


Babur -----> Indian Forces of today ...

Hope you get the symbolism here ...

He invaded and plundered what is now Pakistan as well. Name a missile East India Company too.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Akash can very well defend against such missiles, the target pilotless drone PTA lakshya travels at 0.72 Mach 15 to 25 meters above sea level, which can sucessfully simulate the aforementioned cruise missile which is marginally faster than the PTA Lakshya. Akash is utilizes an integrated ramjet-rocket propulsion system capable of thrust throughout the flight at 2.5 Mach and 15G maneuverability.

RCS of Lakshya?

 

[AUz]

He invaded and plundered what is now Pakistan as well. Name a missile East India Company too.

East India company "imperialized" India by the means of deception.

Babur directly destroyed Indian forces in a military conflict.

Difference.

Plus : Babur came from central Asia and today , half of Pakistan lies in central Asia (other side of Indus) ...so probably we will be firing baburs at your forces from other side of the Indus In this way , babur (from central Asia) will destroy Indians once again and history will repeat itself...

 

[Firemaster]

mm well its symbolic. Babur destroyed Indian forces in its battles against them ....


Babur -----> Indian Forces of today ...

Hope you get the symbolism here ...



Was Lakshya flying 50 metres above the ground? Was it employing "radar evading" technology? Was Lakshya using TERCOM as its guidance system?

What is the maneuvering capability of Babur? Akash missile can do upto 15g.

 

[ALOK31]

mm well its symbolic. Babur destroyed Indian forces in its battles against them ....


Babur -----> Indian Forces of today ...

Hope you get the symbolism here ...

BABUR NEVER FIGHT ANY INDIAN FORCES HE WAS ONLY FIGHT 100s of VARY SMALL INDIAN KINGDOMS .WHO FIGHT EACH OTHER THATS'S WHY THEY ARE WEAK AND THAT'S THE REASON BABUR SUCESSED TO ATTACK AND CAPTURE MANY PARTS OF MORDEN INDIA.BUT TODAY INDIA IS WAY MORE POWERFUL THAN ANY SO CALLED ISLAMIC COUNTRY .

 

[AUz]

BABUR NEVER FIGHT ANY INDIAN FORCES HE WAS ONLY FIGHT 100s of VARY SMALL INDIAN KINGDOMS .WHO FIGHT EACH OTHER THATS'S WHY THEY ARE WEAK AND THAT'S THE REASON BABUR SUCESSED TO ATTACK AND CAPTURE MANY PARTS OF MORDEN INDIA.BUT TODAY INDIA IS WAY MORE POWERFUL THAN ANY SO CALLED ISLAMIC COUNTRY .AND e.g. 1971 96000 SOLDIER'S SURRENDER IN EAST PAKISTAN ..

You are 12 years old , aren't you?

Are you mad or you just spilled your cerelac on caps button?

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

BABUR NEVER FIGHT ANY INDIAN FORCES HE WAS ONLY FIGHT 100s of VARY SMALL INDIAN KINGDOMS .WHO FIGHT EACH OTHER THATS'S WHY THEY ARE WEAK AND THAT'S THE REASON BABUR SUCESSED TO ATTACK AND CAPTURE MANY PARTS OF MORDEN INDIA.BUT TODAY INDIA IS WAY MORE POWERFUL THAN ANY SO CALLED ISLAMIC COUNTRY .AND e.g. 1971 96000 SOLDIER'S SURRENDER IN EAST PAKISTAN ..

Babur was a military genius.

 

[Firemaster]

Guys it is not the thread to discuss ancient history. Mods please have a look

 

[AUz]

Babur was a military genius.

AND technologically superior to Indians. But leave him , he is just a troll....

 

[ALOK31]

You are 12 years old , aren't you?

Are you mad or you just spilled your cerelac on caps button?

I AM 16 & HALF SO WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM ?

 

[Water Car Engineer]

East India company "imperialized" India by the means of deception.

Babur directly destroyed Indian forces in a military conflict.

Difference.

Plus : Babur came from central Asia and today , half of Pakistan lies in central Asia (other side of Indus) ...so probably we will be firing baburs at your forces from other side of the Indus In this way , babur (from central Asia) will destroy Indians once again and history will repeat itself...

Babur directly destroyed Indian forces in a military conflict.

Well, not really. East India Company kicked some serious Marathi, Mysoree, Punjabi, Bengali, Mughali, etc, etc........... ***. Then allied with the rest.

(from central Asia) will destroy Indians once again and history will repeat itself...

Babur destroyed parts of Northern India(including Pakistan). Shoot at yourself.

^^

 

[MilSpec]

RCS of Lakshya?

Rajendra PPAR can track arty shells, hence intercept of cruise missile is least of it's concerns, The target was towed by the PTA lakshya hence rcs of target unkown, but also remember these are user trials, Army will test it against current and future threats for its operational planning.

Was Lakshya flying 50 metres above the ground? Was it employing "radar evading" technology? Was Lakshya using TERCOM as its guidance system?

Well I wasn't there for the test, hence can't inform you for sure, but as these are user trails, they are meant for clear and present threat, baburs can be assumed one of them.
Babur missile claims to have a CEP of ~2m, Babur also uses a combination of inertial navigation systems, terrain contour matching (TERCOM) and GPS satellite guidance. GPS induces estimated error growth of 0.67 m per 100 km, with baburs range of 700Km there will be an induced probabilty of 5.36m to begin with unless pakistan got it's own gps system which we dont know of.

 

[Firemaster]

^^^Sandy
The target towed by Lakshya had the RCS 0.2m^2

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Rajendra PPAR can track arty shells, hence intercept of cruise missile is least of it's concerns, The target was towed by the PTA lakshya hence rcs of target unkown, but also remember these are user trials, Army will test it against current and future threats for its operational planning.

Wow!