That would be relevant if we accepted that he was a terrorist. We don't accept he was one, we believe he was framed. You are free to believe otherwise. Only a complete blockhead would buy the idiotic theory that RAW would use an Indian to go around placing bombs inside a hostile city all by himself. Just a single individual doing some Rambo stuff........ Do you chaps really believe that there would have been no Pakistanis who RAW could have used? Do you think they would have used an Indian who might actually leave a trail & especially use a non-Muslim for that?
As the MEA said today..." if we believed he was guilty, we would have never asked for his release"
You are welcome to your narrative. Unlike in the case of Kasab where Pakistan tried everything from he was "Amar Singh" to he was in Nepal, India stood by Sarabjit Singh. He may or might not have been a spy but he almost certainly was framed for bomb blasts he did not commit. That remains our view which is why we treat him the way we do, more so in death because he most certainly was killed because he was an Indian. That is our connection.