Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In a fast changing environment other factors outweigh some issues. Su-35 is no different to Su-30MKI RCS wise and both sides have AWACS.So all the argument all the time of having small RCS plane goes down the flush. Lol.
Su35 will have HUGE RCS
Yeah exactly IAF realized it 20 years back. Lol.In a fast changing environment other factors outweigh some issues. Su-35 is no different to Su-30MKI RCS wise and both sides have AWACS.
yes f-15E strike eagle is fully capable of carrying bombsWe'll be putting too much into American hands again. The Eagle is a wonderful aircraft, but comes from an unreliable supplier and is superceded by more current platforms.
And bombs on an Eagle?
Ah ok, you said F-15 which refers to air superiority variants, not the strike ones. Both have different roles and capabilities.yes f-15E strike eagle is fully capable of carrying bombs
countries like saudi arabia, korea and singapore are still buys f-15s so it is still very much a capable aircraft
So all the argument all the time of having small RCS plane goes down the flush. Lol.
Su35 will have HUGE RCS
2 Squadrons.
In general the advancing forces tend to lose more fighters as they have to contend with enemy fighter and air defence. SO your assumptions will only hold true if we could use the Stand off ammo to totally annihilate the enemy air defence and their air force gets decimated/severely compromised. The role of Babar and Raad aside, you will suffer serious damage to your air inventory as they have a comprehensive cover of long range SAMs . So your assumption is not correct.PAF will lose fewer planes if it takes the fight into the enemy territory taking a defensive posture will not be beneficial
Raad and babur cruise missiles will play a vital role in damaging enemy bases and aircraft parked there
Standoff weaponry will be key and it is important that we improve the range as well as weight and stealthiness/reduce RCS. Investing in guided submunition bomblets would also be helpful in terms of targeting enemy armor, scattered assets, air fields, etc.In general the advancing forces tend to lose more fighters as they have to contend with enemy fighter and air defence. SO your assumptions will only hold true if we could use the Stand off ammo to totally annihilate the enemy air defence and their air force gets decimated/severely compromised. The role of Babar and Raad aside, you will suffer serious damage to your air inventory as they have a comprehensive cover of long range SAMs . So your assumption is not correct.
So, we should try hard for f15s or f18s.. This will also open our gates for F35 in future.
Nuclear issue is the past thing. Now, even U.S.A accepts that our nuclear program is in the safe hands and U.S.A supported Pakistan on international forums for safety issues.However this can be possible if Pakistan some how roles back on the nuclear program. Then this would be considered as a reasonable deterrence.
Now do you think this is Possible?
well if we take a historical perspective air forces which adopt an aggressive approach tend to inflict more damage than defensive.In general the advancing forces tend to lose more fighters as they have to contend with enemy fighter and air defence. SO your assumptions will only hold true if we could use the Stand off ammo to totally annihilate the enemy air defence and their air force gets decimated/severely compromised. The role of Babar and Raad aside, you will suffer serious damage to your air inventory as they have a comprehensive cover of long range SAMs . So your assumption is not correct.
New Recruit
2 squadrons should be the start but as economy improves and budget increases we need to increase number of squadrons. 5th Generation is at least a decade away.
Nuclear issue is the past thing. Now, even U.S.A accepts that our nuclear program is in the safe hands and U.S.A supported Pakistan on international forums for safety issues.
U.S.A can offer F35s, if we ensure them technology will not fall in China hands as we ensured them in block52+ case.
This is right of every country to ensure security of technology
Pak nuclear stockpiling reminiscent of Cold War-era Soviet Union: US think tank report | idrw.orgNow, even U.S.A accepts that our nuclear program is in the safe hands