What's new

Ahmad Shah Durrani's place in Pakistan's history

To an extent you are right, it was a tribal confederacy held together by strong personality and leadership of Abdali , his successors were not that talented and competent. Still the main factor in decline of empire was the civil war and loose central authority. By 1798 Afghan rule on Punjab was nominal and Sikh misals were the practical rulers, the civil war in Afghanistan triggered the forward policy of Sikhs and the first Afghan stronghold in Punjab, Kasur, fell in 1807 AD because Sadozai vs Barakzai conflict was going on and none of the side came to the aid. Abdali himself never had full control over his own domain but he was capable of suppressing any revolt with his military experience, his successors, the Sadozais ,were unable to properly administer such a large empire in the absence of proper administration and proper system. Abdali crushed every Sikh force he encountered but he failed to find the solution for ending the Sikh insurgency. Durranis were newbies, they had no experience of administration like Mughals.
Even the Sikh Kingdom declined after the death of Ranjit Singh and thats one of the reasons why I dont really
rate the Sikh Kingdom. It won some impressive battles but it collapsed too quickly. The Mughal Dynasty, the
Maratha Empire and the Vijayanagar Empire were certainly greater as these Dynasties produced several
great rulers who established some great administrative systems which allowed these Dynasties to flourish
for a much longer time than the Sikh Kingdom.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom