As long as a version of history doesn't stand in the way of sovereignty adopting a certain version seems OK.
Right from the start kalu_miah's motive has been to make us aware of Indian hegemony in neighboring countries-perhaps justified from Indian geopolitical perspective, but harmful from BD and other neighbors' perspective. He pointed out that in their hegemonic mission India used Awami League who willingly allowed itself to be used by a hostile neighbor and continue to do so.
The AL didn't severe their Indian connection on BD's separation from Pakistan. It has depended on India for election and party finance which manifests in giving priority of Indian business interests over Bangladeshi ones, in their enthusiasm for giving transit to India despite the later's denying of rightful share of water from common rivers, etc.
Unfortunately despite India's ill-intent towards BD we have been taught a version of history that shows Indo-Awami nexus as some kind of a savior for Bangladesh. So it's left for the informed individual to state or discover the pattern of activities of BAL which they have assumed since Mujib took its helm.