What's new

AFTER THREE FAILURES, MIRACLE AWAITS NIRBHAY TEST SUCCESS ON MAY 31ST

No SARH missile can intercept much 3 object.
wrong, where did you got that info from?
any SAM with 10-70 km range can intercept a high speed , high signature missiles, even if it travels at mach 4-5

this where low signature, low trajectory cruise missile come in with terrain hugging tech
 
.
Ok we are scared from you crap, out of this universe, cow piss, vedic Brohmouse we are defenseless now happy:p: so you can go to sleep:sleep::enjoy::lol::rofl::sarcastic::jester::man_in_love:

Did you run out of things to say. :lol:
Still can't find anything about fn 90 being a RAM:lol::lol:.
Know more about these weapon systems before you post bs about them.
 
.
wrong, where did you got that info from?
any SAM with 10-70 km range can intercept a high speed , high signature missiles, even if it travels at mach 4-5

this where low signature, low trajectory cruise missile come in with terrain hugging tech
Nope it is impossible for any SARH missile to intercept targets at Mach 3.
Even the latest Buk M2 cannot intercept targets faster than mach 2.2
 
. .
Grumman was only involved in a feasibility study on the Sabre II project, nothing to do with JF-17.
And even if one was to believe in the involvement of Mikoyan involvement, unlike LCA, the results are before us within a decade, OTOH, what's happened with LCA is no secret.

http://www.rediff.com/news/2001/jan/13nad.htm

4496626765_9009ec0ed1_o.jpg

Both of these had been debunked years before. Try better before coming up with 15-20 year old data.

And your argument cuts both ways. If India with it's large aerospace vendor base can build systems with indigenous content of only around 60%, what would the same for Pakistan be ?

Mikoyan was the consultant, which isn't different from dassualt in LCA. And we now have the results, with 123 LCA on order, and a capable aerospace industry developing a fifth gen fighter, aerospace materials, avionics, EW systems, AESA radars & now aero engines in-house.
 
Last edited:
. . .
Proof me first kid that FN-90 is a copy of crotale SAMS

The HQ-7 is a Chinese clone of the French Thales/Thomson CSF Crotale SAM. During the 1970s the French supplied samples of the Crotale which was promptly reverse engineered. The cloned Crotale has been built in two configurations, a high mobility variant for PLA Army units on a 4 x 4 cloned French Thomson-Hotchkiss P4R armoured vehicle, and a less mobile PLA-AF air field defence system, using either a trailer or a truck platform. Since then, derivative variants have emerged in the FM-90 series, in addition to the shipboard variants.

http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-HQ-7-Crotale.html
 
.
The HQ-7 is a Chinese clone of the French Thales/Thomson CSF Crotale SAM. During the 1970s the French supplied samples of the Crotale which was promptly reverse engineered. The cloned Crotale has been built in two configurations, a high mobility variant for PLA Army units on a 4 x 4 cloned French Thomson-Hotchkiss P4R armoured vehicle, and a less mobile PLA-AF air field defence system, using either a trailer or a truck platform. Since then, derivative variants have emerged in the FM-90 series, in addition to the shipboard variants.

http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-HQ-7-Crotale.html
Thank you sir I admit my mistake sir

Bleshmey!!!!
hqdefault.jpg
Go first drink you cow cola then you concern about weather muslim is drinking came piss or not:enjoy:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom