After insulting Rajnath Singh, Pakistan must re-learn the virtue of being a good host

[DesiGuy1403]

border is quit don't mean our leaders are doing something...

J & K leadership has been abject failure. Why are they not showing Hurriyat leaders their place?

 

[danger007]

Butt hurt.

may be non sense or too scared to telecast his speech..

 

[hkdas]

J & K leadership has been abject failure. Why are they not showing Hurriyat leaders their place?

i won't say that... even tho Mehbooba Mufti is a B!tC#, till now she acted well in this situation...politics are played in a different way.. particularly in the place were some insurgency is going on..
Hurriyat leaders are vultures, they want to make this situation to use in their favor, they don't care who get hurt or die in this. and there are 100s of fanatics who are blindly following them, as a respected state, gov. and SF cannot just kill these savages, a dead hurriyat leaders makes more problem than when they were alive. after all that old dog Syed Ali Shah Geelani is not going to make it up to 2020, let him play as best as he can... our intel and political leaders are good in handling savages like him.

 

[Asian.Century]

burhan wani is a terrorist pig with a 10 lakh bounty on his head.. he was an idiot who like to post pics of his fellow terrorist dog friends holding AK47s in their hand... i don't know that holding weapons in hand and declaring fight against the nation and attacking and killing security forces is not a crime in pakistan. but in india it is an act of terrorism. and we will send every terrorists to hell. don't matter what a country like Pakistan who allow an UN designated terrorist to live freely in their country said about it.

border is quit don't mean our leaders are doing something...

Why not then send the biggest terrorist who killed thousands of innocent muslims in Gujrat to hell....but yet u make tat terrorist a prime minister..hypocricy....Modi ji ex chief minister of Gujrat committed acts of terrorism.

N what abt col prohit and the pakistani samjuta express train killers. Where is Indian justice.

And what about shiv sena, RSS or Saffron goons committing acts of terrotism in india killing christians, Dalits and muslims.


You want to "act" & not "talk"....tats wat u have been doin "acting" for so long past 15 years.... bombings, terrorism in pakistan...cross border attacks by ur sponsored indian army and now killing innocent women and children in occupied Kashmir. what u always got is a response on ur actions from Pakistanis n u will keep getting that more.

India has become weak, unstable and vulnerable

 

[-blitzkrieg-]

India's home minister Rajnath Singh goes to Pakistan as a guest and comes back insulted - his speech censored, hotel surrounded by protesters and official luncheon ruined by a sulking government taking dictation from a banned terror outfit.

With its churlish behaviour, Pakistan ended up doing exactly what it wanted to avoid: Giving publicity to the Indian home minister's words, denying him media space. Singh's speech is now almost everywhere, it is being quoted by international agencies, talked about in India and, to Pakistan's misfortune, being debated in its own country.

Under normal circumstances, Singh's address to the Saarc leaders would have passed off as a normal speech. But the controversy and curiosity around it has given it a life and legend of its own.
The entire episode reminds us of the story of Hanuman's visit to Ravana's Lanka. Eager to spite the messenger, the demon king sets Hanuman's tale on fire and ends up burning down his own capital.



During Singh's visit to Pakistan for the Saarc summit, Islamabad acted almost like a B-team of Jamaat-ud-Dawa chief and outlawed terrorist Hafiz Saeed, following the agenda he had set. As if to ensure Saeed was not seen as a paper tiger, the Pakistani government allowed protesters to camp near Singh's hotel and turn it effectively into a staging area for protests.

Ensuring the safety of a diplomatic guest, keeping miscreants away is a standard protocol all hosts follow during VIP visits. It would be pertinent to point out to Pakistan here that India, like a gracious host, goes out of its way to ensure Tibetan protesters do not get any opportunity to ruin a visiting Chinese premier's visit. But Pakistan, obviously, had a different plan in mind: It wanted to use Singh's visit as a propaganda tool for its Kashmir lobby.

Speaking at the Democratic National Convention, US First Lady Michelle Obama offered an interesting punchline while taking down Donald Trump:When they go low, we go high.

To Singh's credit, he decided to visit Pakistan in spite of threats of mass protests by Saeed. Once India had taken the decision, it was Pakistan's responsibility to behave like a good host, if not a gracious neighbour. It is a shame it didn't. Not attending the lunch was a new low. Speaking at a press conference, Pakistan's interior minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan said he had received a message from the Indian minister asking whether he (Nisar) would be coming to the lunch. The interior minister said he excused himself as he had to attend an important meeting at the prime minister's residence.

This, from a country whose leaders gorge on biryani in our country even during personal visits.

The Pakistani media, while debating Singh's walkout, has imparted to a different spin to the story. It claims the Indian home minister walked out in a huff after losing a war of words with Chaudhry. The Indian minister indirectly accused Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism. But when Chaudhry responded - after relinquishing his position as the chairman of the meeting - Singh found it difficult to digest, claimed Dawn.

That is like saying Hanuman walked out of Lanka with his tail burnt. Singh had gone there with the specific purpose of speaking his mind on the issue of terrorism sponsored by Pakistan. Once he had done that and in the process set the house on fire, it made no sense to endure Pakistan's usual litany of explanation and ''our freedom fighter-your terrorist" spiel.

Finally, before we forget Pakistan's insolence and impudence, let us get this off our chest: What does the Indian government intend to do to ensure such acts are not repeated?

In 2013, when then Pakistani prime minister Nawaz Sharif compared his Indian counterpart Manmohan Singh with a dehati aurat, Narendra Modi retorted in trademark style: "How dare you (Sharif) address my nation's prime minister as a village woman? There cannot be a bigger insult of the Indian Prime Minister," Modi said during a rally in New Delhi, adding, "We can fight with him (Manmohan) over policies, but we will not tolerate this. This nation of 1.2 billion will not tolerate its prime minister's insult."

This country of 1.2 billion should not tolerate the home minister's insult either.

As prime minister, Modi has been extremely lenient with Pakistan so far, a privilege that seems to have gone to Pakistan's head. When he became the prime minister, Modi decided to start with a clean state by inviting Sharif to his swearing-in and then exchanging gifts. Then, when the two countries had given up on bilateral talks, Modi made another gesture of friendship by making a brief stopover in Lahore while returning from Afghanistan in December 2015.

But, India and Pakistan are back where they were in 2014 at Kathmandu, sulking in public, throwing barbs at each other, bickering in the glare of the media.

Much of this is Pakistan's fault.

Over the past two years, it has responded to every friendly gesture with a fresh round of hostilities, a trend that was capped by the terror strike on Pathankot within hours of Modi's Lahore visit.
Although India has been keen on reviving talks, bringing Pakistan back to the table, the results have been discouraging. Pakistan's behaviour at Saarc should force India to chalk out a long-term plan for dealing with the neighbour.

It should start by summoning the Pakistan's High Commissioner to India and raising strong objections to the treatment meted out to the home minister.

Give him an earful, read him the riot act, familiarise him with etiquette, and then offer him a cup of tea to show that even in anger we do not forget the basics of mehmaan nawazi, something Nawaz and his team have forgotten.

Indian Media right now

 

[That Guy]

Same tune? Your minister's throw nuclear war threats every Sunday

And your ministers throw around claims of invading Pakistan every sunday as well. Let's not play these games.

 

[ziaulislam]

India's home minister Rajnath Singh goes to Pakistan as a guest and comes back insulted - his speech censored, hotel surrounded by protesters and official luncheon ruined by a sulking government taking dictation from a banned terror outfit.

With its churlish behaviour, Pakistan ended up doing exactly what it wanted to avoid: Giving publicity to the Indian home minister's words, denying him media space. Singh's speech is now almost everywhere, it is being quoted by international agencies, talked about in India and, to Pakistan's misfortune, being debated in its own country.

Under normal circumstances, Singh's address to the Saarc leaders would have passed off as a normal speech. But the controversy and curiosity around it has given it a life and legend of its own.
The entire episode reminds us of the story of Hanuman's visit to Ravana's Lanka. Eager to spite the messenger, the demon king sets Hanuman's tale on fire and ends up burning down his own capital.



During Singh's visit to Pakistan for the Saarc summit, Islamabad acted almost like a B-team of Jamaat-ud-Dawa chief and outlawed terrorist Hafiz Saeed, following the agenda he had set. As if to ensure Saeed was not seen as a paper tiger, the Pakistani government allowed protesters to camp near Singh's hotel and turn it effectively into a staging area for protests.

Ensuring the safety of a diplomatic guest, keeping miscreants away is a standard protocol all hosts follow during VIP visits. It would be pertinent to point out to Pakistan here that India, like a gracious host, goes out of its way to ensure Tibetan protesters do not get any opportunity to ruin a visiting Chinese premier's visit. But Pakistan, obviously, had a different plan in mind: It wanted to use Singh's visit as a propaganda tool for its Kashmir lobby.

Speaking at the Democratic National Convention, US First Lady Michelle Obama offered an interesting punchline while taking down Donald Trump:When they go low, we go high.

To Singh's credit, he decided to visit Pakistan in spite of threats of mass protests by Saeed. Once India had taken the decision, it was Pakistan's responsibility to behave like a good host, if not a gracious neighbour. It is a shame it didn't. Not attending the lunch was a new low. Speaking at a press conference, Pakistan's interior minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan said he had received a message from the Indian minister asking whether he (Nisar) would be coming to the lunch. The interior minister said he excused himself as he had to attend an important meeting at the prime minister's residence.

This, from a country whose leaders gorge on biryani in our country even during personal visits.

The Pakistani media, while debating Singh's walkout, has imparted to a different spin to the story. It claims the Indian home minister walked out in a huff after losing a war of words with Chaudhry. The Indian minister indirectly accused Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism. But when Chaudhry responded - after relinquishing his position as the chairman of the meeting - Singh found it difficult to digest, claimed Dawn.

That is like saying Hanuman walked out of Lanka with his tail burnt. Singh had gone there with the specific purpose of speaking his mind on the issue of terrorism sponsored by Pakistan. Once he had done that and in the process set the house on fire, it made no sense to endure Pakistan's usual litany of explanation and ''our freedom fighter-your terrorist" spiel.

Finally, before we forget Pakistan's insolence and impudence, let us get this off our chest: What does the Indian government intend to do to ensure such acts are not repeated?

In 2013, when then Pakistani prime minister Nawaz Sharif compared his Indian counterpart Manmohan Singh with a dehati aurat, Narendra Modi retorted in trademark style: "How dare you (Sharif) address my nation's prime minister as a village woman? There cannot be a bigger insult of the Indian Prime Minister," Modi said during a rally in New Delhi, adding, "We can fight with him (Manmohan) over policies, but we will not tolerate this. This nation of 1.2 billion will not tolerate its prime minister's insult."

This country of 1.2 billion should not tolerate the home minister's insult either.

As prime minister, Modi has been extremely lenient with Pakistan so far, a privilege that seems to have gone to Pakistan's head. When he became the prime minister, Modi decided to start with a clean state by inviting Sharif to his swearing-in and then exchanging gifts. Then, when the two countries had given up on bilateral talks, Modi made another gesture of friendship by making a brief stopover in Lahore while returning from Afghanistan in December 2015.

But, India and Pakistan are back where they were in 2014 at Kathmandu, sulking in public, throwing barbs at each other, bickering in the glare of the media.

Much of this is Pakistan's fault.

Over the past two years, it has responded to every friendly gesture with a fresh round of hostilities, a trend that was capped by the terror strike on Pathankot within hours of Modi's Lahore visit.
Although India has been keen on reviving talks, bringing Pakistan back to the table, the results have been discouraging. Pakistan's behaviour at Saarc should force India to chalk out a long-term plan for dealing with the neighbour.

It should start by summoning the Pakistan's High Commissioner to India and raising strong objections to the treatment meted out to the home minister.

Give him an earful, read him the riot act, familiarise him with etiquette, and then offer him a cup of tea to show that even in anger we do not forget the basics of mehmaan nawazi, something Nawaz and his team have forgotten.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-36906242

 

[That Guy]

There were zero insults thrown at mr.singh. As far as I know, the Indian minister started attacking Pakistan's stance, and claiming Pakistan supports terrorism, and it was only after that Nisar actually gave him a befitting reply.

As for the media, it was standard procedure, even India said there was no censorship.

 

[MadDog]

Same tune? Your minister's throw nuclear war threats every Sunday

Give me a break, no one threatened with nuclear war, Indian media has filled you with nonsense, what do you think while you are killing women and children in Kashmir, Pakistani govt would have welcomed your minister here with garlands !!!

 

[X-2.]

That came from no where lol
Wl choudary nisar left lunch as he though rajnath having loose motion as he went toilet 8 times and he himself said I didn't came for lunch and he hi self didn't speaked to media not even while leaving for India at airport
Abi moun ma dalty or rajnath bura man jata tu

 

[shhh]

may be non sense or too scared to telecast his speech..

No buddy, you are butt hurt.

 

[Windjammer]

modi didn't kill any one... if he had done that then he would be in jail not in PM's chair... only pakistanis will say that he killed 1000s. india is not pakistan to make a terrorist as our leader.. RSS, shiv sena never done any terrorist act against anyone. you are complete out of your mind. they don't even own a assault rifle. RSS and shiv sena are just some religious organisations and political party who support BJP.
you better keep your army's propaganda within yourself, i don't want to hear that. we are not pakistan to support terrorism, even your political and military leaders said many times that they supported terrorism in india, and they still do.. that is the reason why a UN designated terrorist is living freely in pakistan.. he is calling for terrorist attack in india publicly and your gov and military is supporting him... and every one knows that pakistan is supporting terrorism... that is why your country is called "epic center of terrorism".
only occupied kashmir is "PAKISTAN OCCUPIED KASHMIR" or otherwise called "P. O, K" entair kashmir belongs to india, pakistan is illegally occupying kashmir since 1947. you Pakistanis better get our of our land. even most terrorist hit area in kashmir is more secure than Islamabad in pakistan..

That's a nice bubble you live in but it's non practical since it's only the British Queen who thinks world smells of fresh paint.
Can't recall if Azad Kahmir was ever under curfew, however although it's a common word in India since it's imposed there in one place or other but for the last whole month, the INDIAN OCCUPIED KASHMIR has had this privilege and just to shake your senses , this is the situation today, so please spare us the banter.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...-Kashmir-toll-now-53/articleshow/53565305.cms

 

[HAIDER]

India's home minister Rajnath Singh goes to Pakistan as a guest and comes back insulted - his speech censored, hotel surrounded by protesters and official luncheon ruined by a sulking government taking dictation from a banned terror outfit.

With its churlish behaviour, Pakistan ended up doing exactly what it wanted to avoid: Giving publicity to the Indian home minister's words, denying him media space. Singh's speech is now almost everywhere, it is being quoted by international agencies, talked about in India and, to Pakistan's misfortune, being debated in its own country.

Under normal circumstances, Singh's address to the Saarc leaders would have passed off as a normal speech. But the controversy and curiosity around it has given it a life and legend of its own.
The entire episode reminds us of the story of Hanuman's visit to Ravana's Lanka. Eager to spite the messenger, the demon king sets Hanuman's tale on fire and ends up burning down his own capital.



During Singh's visit to Pakistan for the Saarc summit, Islamabad acted almost like a B-team of Jamaat-ud-Dawa chief and outlawed terrorist Hafiz Saeed, following the agenda he had set. As if to ensure Saeed was not seen as a paper tiger, the Pakistani government allowed protesters to camp near Singh's hotel and turn it effectively into a staging area for protests.

Ensuring the safety of a diplomatic guest, keeping miscreants away is a standard protocol all hosts follow during VIP visits. It would be pertinent to point out to Pakistan here that India, like a gracious host, goes out of its way to ensure Tibetan protesters do not get any opportunity to ruin a visiting Chinese premier's visit. But Pakistan, obviously, had a different plan in mind: It wanted to use Singh's visit as a propaganda tool for its Kashmir lobby.

Speaking at the Democratic National Convention, US First Lady Michelle Obama offered an interesting punchline while taking down Donald Trump:When they go low, we go high.

To Singh's credit, he decided to visit Pakistan in spite of threats of mass protests by Saeed. Once India had taken the decision, it was Pakistan's responsibility to behave like a good host, if not a gracious neighbour. It is a shame it didn't. Not attending the lunch was a new low. Speaking at a press conference, Pakistan's interior minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan said he had received a message from the Indian minister asking whether he (Nisar) would be coming to the lunch. The interior minister said he excused himself as he had to attend an important meeting at the prime minister's residence.

This, from a country whose leaders gorge on biryani in our country even during personal visits.

The Pakistani media, while debating Singh's walkout, has imparted to a different spin to the story. It claims the Indian home minister walked out in a huff after losing a war of words with Chaudhry. The Indian minister indirectly accused Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism. But when Chaudhry responded - after relinquishing his position as the chairman of the meeting - Singh found it difficult to digest, claimed Dawn.

That is like saying Hanuman walked out of Lanka with his tail burnt. Singh had gone there with the specific purpose of speaking his mind on the issue of terrorism sponsored by Pakistan. Once he had done that and in the process set the house on fire, it made no sense to endure Pakistan's usual litany of explanation and ''our freedom fighter-your terrorist" spiel.

Finally, before we forget Pakistan's insolence and impudence, let us get this off our chest: What does the Indian government intend to do to ensure such acts are not repeated?

In 2013, when then Pakistani prime minister Nawaz Sharif compared his Indian counterpart Manmohan Singh with a dehati aurat, Narendra Modi retorted in trademark style: "How dare you (Sharif) address my nation's prime minister as a village woman? There cannot be a bigger insult of the Indian Prime Minister," Modi said during a rally in New Delhi, adding, "We can fight with him (Manmohan) over policies, but we will not tolerate this. This nation of 1.2 billion will not tolerate its prime minister's insult."

This country of 1.2 billion should not tolerate the home minister's insult either.

As prime minister, Modi has been extremely lenient with Pakistan so far, a privilege that seems to have gone to Pakistan's head. When he became the prime minister, Modi decided to start with a clean state by inviting Sharif to his swearing-in and then exchanging gifts. Then, when the two countries had given up on bilateral talks, Modi made another gesture of friendship by making a brief stopover in Lahore while returning from Afghanistan in December 2015.

But, India and Pakistan are back where they were in 2014 at Kathmandu, sulking in public, throwing barbs at each other, bickering in the glare of the media.

Much of this is Pakistan's fault.

Over the past two years, it has responded to every friendly gesture with a fresh round of hostilities, a trend that was capped by the terror strike on Pathankot within hours of Modi's Lahore visit.
Although India has been keen on reviving talks, bringing Pakistan back to the table, the results have been discouraging. Pakistan's behaviour at Saarc should force India to chalk out a long-term plan for dealing with the neighbour.

It should start by summoning the Pakistan's High Commissioner to India and raising strong objections to the treatment meted out to the home minister.

Give him an earful, read him the riot act, familiarise him with etiquette, and then offer him a cup of tea to show that even in anger we do not forget the basics of mehmaan nawazi, something Nawaz and his team have forgotten.

wat a propaganda .......In Islamabad people found more security people then population. Ch Nisar didn't say anything wrong. How long India will runaway from Kashmir issue ? .....they need to sit and talk , and come up with comprehensive solution. This will be relief for both countries from over spending on defence . Respect the sign accords in 70s or 48, set up the frame work and resolve the issue.

Singh sahab must learn how to handle tough situation than making false excuses

maybe he's influenced by Indian Cricket Team,Good performance only in home

Modi made this rookie , local uneducated guy a interior minister. Who know how to pass the dishes , but when his term came he left the conference. Act like little kid. Atleast Congress used to have well mannered people with patience . They deliver there reservation but also listen others with patience. Even though its all useless to talk about the issue with any Indian govt. They always escape to avoid confront Kashmir issue.

 

[The Sandman]

First time NS's government has shown some spine to india it's a very good news finally

 

[hkdas]

That's a nice bubble you live in but it's non practical since it's only the British Queen who thinks world smells of fresh paint.
Can't recall if Azad Kahmir was ever under curfew, however although it's a common word in India since it's imposed there in one place or other but for the last whole month, the INDIAN OCCUPIED KASHMIR has had this privilege and just to shake your senses , this is the situation today, so please spare us the banter.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...-Kashmir-toll-now-53/articleshow/53565305.cms

it is you who is living in a bubble. your media didn't report it doesn't mean that there is no problem or any fight against pakistani occupation of kashmir...
watch and enjoy this...

and BTW, pakistan sponserd terrorists who are conducting protests in J&K not only attack security forces, they also attack
Irrigation Deptt office , hospitals, media... they are attacking every thing they see.. they are acting like they want to freedom from everything, and J&K police is doing their best to give freedom to them.. 50 of them get freedom from everything and some are on waiting list..

Irrigation Deptt office set ablaze in Anantnag
http://www.greaterkashmir.com/news/...ptt-office-set-ablaze-in-anantnag/223842.html

Press TV journalist attacked by mob
http://risingkashmir.com/news/press-tv-journalist-attacked-by-mob
looks like Iranian get a fair treatment from kashmiris


Mob In Kashmir Attacks The Same Military Hospital Where They Get Treatment
http://topyaps.com/mob-attacks-military-hospital-in-kashmir