The sectarian menace raised by USA/Jewish lobbies is at best now. We will see inhuman acts by our so called Irani Islamic liberators and Arab Mujahdeen in whole Muslim world. I only pray for Pak may Allah save it from theses sectarian vultures who no shit about their religion and even then claim to be leaders of Islam.
Pak govt should take strict action and stop Pak to become supply ground for Iran and Saudis alike.
On the other hand if Iran gets involved in Behrain or Yemen then Iranian borders will be safe no more.
Look at the region pre-1979 and look at the region after 1979.
Figure out what was the key event in the Middle East in 1979 and you will have the answer. You will then know the main reason of the current instability/mess. Of course not the sole reason but the key reason without a doubt.
When you have a regime in power that does not care about anything else than spreading their poisonous ideology even disregarding their people and their country's development in the process, you cannot expect peace. There is a reason why that pariah state has been sanctioned and isolated ever since 1979, largely, and why it is accused as being the largest STATE sponsor of terrorism and instability.
In the span of days, secular, pro-Israeli, pro-US, pro-Western Iran became a spokesman of Shia Muslims worldwide (who gave them this patent?) while all holy Shia/Muslim sites are located in KSA or Iraq and historically Southern Iraq and regions such as Eastern Arabia and Northern Yemen were Shia strongholds/the most important ones, in the Islamic world. Only after the forceful and extremely bloody forcible Safavid mass conversions of Iranians from mainly Sunni to Shia Islam, did Iran become majority Shia (Twelver).
There were so few Shia clerics and Shias that the Safavids had to mass-import Arab Shia clerics from modern-day Lebanon, Iraq and Eastern Arabia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safavid_conversion_of_Iran_to_Shia_Islam
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safavid_conversion_of_Iran_to_Shia_Islam#Arab_Shia_Ulema
In fact the Iranian Mullah's who are an illegitimate regime, unelected and without any historical presence as a past ruling group of people, who came to power in 1979, after their leader went back from "kufar" France on a Air France plane, have altered traditional Shia Islam and invented the 37 year old Wilyat al-Faqih.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guardianship_of_the_Islamic_Jurist
But don't say this to anyone but even Shia Arabs invented that but Khomeini just stole the idea when he saw an opportunity to become what he became.
This ideology/attempt at altering Shia Islam and mixing Iranian geopolitical ambitions and influence with Shia Islam (that has nothing to do with Iran as a country) has threatened and threatens the traditional Hawza of Najaf.
Shia clerics, prominent included, speak about this openly.
For instance this Iraqi Shia Arab who spoke about this YEARS ago and a few years after Saddam was removed.
He spoke about this during a time when this occurred:
A former Hezbollah leader:
In fact make that plural:
Anyway that regime is on loan so I don't give them a much longer expiry date but removing the poison the quicker the better for everyone in the region.
Also notice how nobody is bothered about Zaydis, Ismailis, traditional non-Wilayat al-Faqih Shias etc.
However we dislike Wilayat al-Faqih puppet organizations and its leaders (not the ordinary man and woman unless they harm our Muslim brothers and sisters or fellow Arabs - which they have unfortunately been doing in Syria) especially if they speak like this:
Notice the name of the Youtube video uploader. Probably an nationalist Lebanese that is tired of part of his country being hijacked by a foreign-backed Mullah organization that cares more about the Mullah's in Iran than their own country and people.
So if you have that in mind and connect what has been going on in the region since 1979, you will understand, why most Arabs are very hostile towards the Iranian regime (not necessarily the Iranian people) and why we cannot work/live with them any longer as neighbors if they continue what they have been doing.
Anyway even if this news is wrong, we have heard Iranian Mullah monkeys claim something similar about Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen.
http://jcpa.org/article/iran-sanaa-yemen/
@f1000n this post is intended for you so you can wake up and face the reality and realize that an pro-Iranian Mullah Iraqi regime, on the long run, is very bad news for Iraq and why most Arabs have a hard time trusting such an Iraqi government. You already know, as history is my evidence, that this has nothing to do with Shia faith, as otherwise there would be no Shias left in the GCC and Yemen where there were never any sectarian problems and to this day they are very limited despite conflict. Same in KSA.
You can also see in the media that there is zero hostility against Shia Zaydis, Shia Ismailis and non-Wilayat al-Faqih Shia Islam and Mullah's.
Shia Islam originated in KSA (Madinah), vast majority of it most revered figures are Arabs and scholars. As well as all its holy sites. Sunni Muslims compose 90% of all Muslims and we are not Shia due to disagreeing with certain pillars of Shia Islam, but that is about it. At least for my part. An Arab Shia is as dear to me as any other Arab. So let us cut this anti-Shia nonsense once and for all. The problem is the Iranian regime and Wilayat al-Faqih elements regardless of ethnicity.
Certain people and groups want such a thing to occur but this is not what this conflict is about essentially. If that was the case the current hostilities would have occurred pre-1979, because the demographics of the region have not changed in 37 years time.
If people cannot understand the points that I have raised, that cannot be questioned in their essence, then they will never understand the current conflict and think it is part of some Arab-Persian mortal fight, totally forgetting, that throughout much of recorded time (in fact the majority) Arabs and Persians lived in a cordial manner or at worst in a neutral setting. This narrative of some kind of mortal genetically inherited hatred/rivalry is nonsense. To begin with there was no nationalism as we know it 1400 years ago let alone until very recently. It were landlords/elites and their allied peasants against other landlords elites either within their homeland or outsiders where everyone could rally against the same enemy.
In short, people are uneducated.
EDIT: No, KSA/GCC/Arab countries are not innocent lambs in this regard and I have never claimed that however "our" actions have been a reaction to the key event (The Iranian "Islamic" Revolution) that kickstarted this mess to begin with. Prior to this Arabs (GCC in particular) and Iran had cordial/mostly warm ties. Expect for that UAE-Iran island controversy that occurred not many years before the "Islamic" Revolution occurred. So no, I will not accept the now common storyline of Arabs being as guilty as Iranians originally or that we are to blame for this mess solely or mostly. Neither does the international community, mind you.
this is the cause of major problems in the middle east now.
