Lonely Hermit
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2012
- Messages
- 691
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
self delete
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
why are afghan quiet on drones? and weeping on shelling?Are civilians acceptable Collateral damage ?
I say they are.. Whether they are in Afghan border areas or in Pakistan's tribal belt. Hence I support these attacks by Pakistan in Afghanistan as well as the drone attacks/special op hits by NATO in Pakistan.
Are there 203mm shells?wow nice guys use 203mm shells please
nope never heard of it.......Isn't there a prevailing issue of pashtuns in tribal areas refusing to receive bodies of slain officers/jawans following a directive from militant propaganda wings ?
That's also counted in insult.
Are there 203mm shells?
i thought maximum size in modern artillery was till 155mm?
Let's see. We even doubt this story is true. Afghan administration is a big a liar as are some of their "friends" who don't even share a border with them.
We Pakistanis condemn civilian damage in any case and that's why we want our reaction to be limited and precise attacking training camps unlike a drone attacking markets and places of worship.
Thats not what last few pages reflect.. But anyway, you are entitled to your opinion as am I..
Impressive i just did a Google search the system are old 1950's and yes Pakistan has plenty of these weapon system.you forget it ?
Most Pakistanis are against civilian killings. Anyways the news looks a bit unauthentic.
As caine said, go and look back the last few pages and posts by Pakistani members.. They kind of contradict you..
Impressive i just did a Google search the system are old 1950's and yes Pakistan has plenty of these weapon system.
How effective are they compared to 155mm, i had thought modern Calliber's had stabilized at 155mm.