What's new

Afghanistan 'will be unable to run military bases post Nato withdrawal'

Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
924
Reaction score
0
Afghanistan 'will be unable to run military bases post Nato withdrawal'

By Ben Farmer, Kabul
Afghanistan will probably be unable to keep running the military bases its international backers have spent billions building after Nato troops leave, a US Congressional report has said.

afghanistan-police_2385871b.jpg

Afghan local police trainees in Helmand​


Kabul's military has neither the staff, nor the expertise, to maintain or operate hundreds of bases it will inherit from the coalition troops as they prepare to withdraw combat forces by the end of 2014.

The audit from a Congressional watchdog which checks the billions America has poured into Afghanistan questioned whether the efforts to bolster the Afghan police and army against the Taliban were sustainable.

The Afghan government would "likely be incapable of fully sustaining Afghan national security forces facilities after the transition in 2014 and the expected decrease in US and coalition support" it warned.

Building up the Afghan forces so they can one day assume the fight against the Taliban has been a central pillar of coalition strategy.

Between 2002 and 2012, America has spent $52 billion (£32 billion) to equip, train, house, and sustain the forces, including about $12 billion alone to build bases.

Yet as they are handed over as Nato troops withdraw, Afghans lack engineers and maintenance staff to keep them going, and struggle with procurement and logistics.

The report by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) found only two fifths of Afghan operations and maintenance posts had been filled.

The Afghan forces lack "personnel with the technical skills required to operate and maintain critical facilities, such as water supply, waste water treatment and power generation".

The Afghan Ministry of Defence procurement process was unable to provide the Afghan army with supplies in a timely manner the report found.

The American Army Corps of Engineers has appointed a contractor to take care of the bases and to train up Afghan staff until Kabul can take care of its own facilities.

But the report found the contractor, ITT Exelis Systems Corporation of Virginia, would run out of money 16 months before one of its two contracts was due to end.

The Army Corps, in written comments accompanying the report, said it agreed with the recommendations and was taking steps to address them.

SIGAR also announced on Thursday that it would launch an investigation into $230 million (£143 million) worth of missing spare parts ordered for the Afghan army.
 
. .
Lol... that may force NATO to extend their stay in Afghanistan after 2014 by few years.

Our Pakistani friends will like it. After all they always wanted stability in Afghanistan:chilli:
 
.
^^^^^^^^

That's right, Mayor of Kabul will not be able to run even it's mayor-ship in Kabul and this is what Pakistan says that you can't achieve stability by ignoring the majority.

And

NATO will not be able to maintain basis after 2014 as well, I think you don't notice increasing number of green on blues
 
. .
Perhaps they should have said NATO rat houses! there are few places that can be called NATO bases but the rest are just air conditioned containers surrounded by sand bags where they used to hide from Taliban! ANSF called again and again that build something concrete so that they could take a hold of it for decades not these disposable junk!

The matter of fact is ANSF don't need them they are building their own forward posts to confront enemies these bases as Karzai said would be used as Schools, Clinics, Agribusiness centers etc..

The political goal of these reports which comes directly from US is they want to stay longer in Afghanistan nothing else! Karzai is squeezing their balls from last 1.5 years just recently he said he will not allow any foreign watch dog in the coming elections! which was welcomed by all oppositions and there you go they said they recognize Durand line.
 
.
Well I expect to see increasing number of Taliban attacks as the year 2014 draws closer, with active Pakistani involvement.

The GHQ wants Afghanistan under its thumb; that's not possible with NATO there.

However, if this is indeed going to be the future, I have a feeling that NATO will shift its combat operation eastwards from its current position.
 
.
Well I expect to see increasing number of Taliban attacks as the year 2014 draws closer, with active Pakistani involvement.

The GHQ wants Afghanistan under its thumb; that's not possible with NATO there.

However, if this is indeed going to be the future, I have a feeling that NATO will shift its combat operation eastwards from its current position.

You mean blue on blue?

GHQ's spending is audited in open.. now you have no reason for any blaming.

Genocides of Pashtoons, followed by carpet bombing was height of tyranny and apparently the ruling non Pashtoons are also getting unhappy.
 
.
However, if this is indeed going to be the future, I have a feeling that NATO will shift its combat operation eastwards from its current position.

The NATO must first learn to fight Taliban before coming to more dangerous locations :azn: ... No end to Indian wet dreams , I must say ...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom