Afghanistan Returns Captured Pakistani Soldier, 5 Bodies

[TMA]

If that's true then every Afghan must be driven out of Punjab and thrown into Afghanistan.

Why not all Afghans to be repatriated from every part of Pakistan?
But first thing is to get rid of the traitors.

 

[KediKesenFare3]

Beghairat Generals and begharait politicians. I don't care about Pashto/Punjabi thing, they were Pakistanis. A beggar, destroyed nation disrespected a nuclear power, and this beghairat leadership is too busy screwing around trying to make money for themselves or calling every Tom,Dick and Harry as their "Bradar".

What other hope can there be when even COAS says Afghans are as dear to him as Pakistanis. Wonder if he knows it's Pakistanis who are paying for his salary, not some ungrateful bachabaz in the mountains of tora bora.

I like your signature.

Why is Pakistan so kind and lenient when it comes to Afghanistan? Should've learned from Turkeye and launch an offensive with heavy armored vehicles and tanks along with airforce.

I don't understand this conflict. What is the underlying issue here? Why is Kabul so obsessed with Pakistan in the first place? Is this about ethnicity?

 

[PatrioticPaki]

We already taught a lesson to those afghanis.

 

[Ryuzaki]

I don't understand this conflict. What is the underlying issue here? Why is Kabul so obsessed with Pakistan in the first place? Is this about ethnicity?

Ethnicity is a part of it,but not the only reason.Afghans accuse Pakistan of state sponsored terrorism and providing safe havens to terrorists.Also,Afghans do not accept the Durand Line,and they do have a point legally(but Pakistan has done a fait accompli).
Afghanistan was the only nation in 1948 which did not want Pak to be a member of UN due to Durand Line issue

 

[MBT 3000]

afghans must be punished

 

[Taimoor Khan]

At times like these one wonder why Pakistan don't use these namak harams as
guinea pigs for new weapons testing. Why not use Ra'ad, NASR, Babur and standoff bombs in live environment. Americans used them as test bed and they respect and accept them as their occupiers.

 

[ziaulislam]

Ethnicity is a part of it,but not the only reason.Afghans accuse Pakistan of state sponsored terrorism and providing safe havens to terrorists.Also,Afghans do not accept the Durand Line,and they do have a point legally(but Pakistan has done a fait accompli).
Afghanistan was the only nation in 1948 which did not want Pak to be a member of UN due to Durand Line issue

Can you explain how they have a point on durand line?

 

[ziaulislam]

I like your signature.



I don't understand this conflict. What is the underlying issue here? Why is Kabul so obsessed with Pakistan in the first place? Is this about ethnicity?

Its called proxy war. they are simple proxies of india...

 

[pakdefender]

Ethnicity is a part of it,but not the only reason.Afghans accuse Pakistan of state sponsored terrorism and providing safe havens to terrorists.Also,Afghans do not accept the Durand Line,and they do have a point legally(but Pakistan has done a fait accompli).
Afghanistan was the only nation in 1948 which did not want Pak to be a member of UN due to Durand Line issue

Then you must be in agreement that Kashmiris have a much more valid point in not being associated with India , as do Sikh population who have valid point about Khalistan and also residents of Assam have valid point

 

[American Pakistani]

I don't understand this conflict. What is the underlying issue here? Why is Kabul so obsessed with Pakistan in the first place? Is this about ethnicity?

Under heavy influence of chars (drugs), they feel that western region of Pakistan belongs to Afghanistan and eastern belongs to Indians. They don't accept the international border(Durand line) between Pakistan and Afghanistan. They also dislike the fact that Pakistani Pushtuns dislike Afghans and don't wanna be part of them, and Pakistani Pushtun region is at least a century ahead of their country.

They are nothing but pawns of international rogue terrorist elements from secret agencies such as RAW.

 

[American Pakistani]

Afghans accuse Pakistan of state sponsored terrorism and providing safe havens to terrorists.

Obviously "chor ki daarhi mein tinka". Your bharat itself responsible of terrorism in 71 mutkia Bahini and afghan terrorism in 2001.

Also,Afghans do not accept the Durand Line,and they do have a point legally(but Pakistan has done a fait accompli).

Afghans are under wrong impression of Durand line being valid for only 100 years time. There is no such thing as 100 years expiry in that agreement.

Some Afghans believe that the Durand Line agreement had an expiry date of 100 years and should have expired in 1993, just like the British-Chinese agreement on Hong Kong. However, this argument is the result of misinformation because the Hong Kong agreement had an explicit clause of 100 year expiry date while the Durand Line agreement had no such mention of an expiry date.

Some believe that agreement was valid until 1947 because British and India parted ways with Afghanistan in 47. According to Vienna international convention which I'm sure Afghanistan is part of, the new state inherit all those agreements.

As far as Pakistan is concerned, its position on Durand Line has been consistent. Under the international law principle uti possidetis juris, Pakistan retains the same borders as its predecessor state held and does not need to conclude another treaty with Afghanistan for this purpose. The Vienna Convention on Succession of States also upholds uti possidetis juris by declaring that bilateral agreements are handed down to successor states.

Pakistan’s stance is supported by all countries of the world, including USA. In 1949, two years after independence of Pakistan, the British House of Commons officially reconfirmed their position declaring that the Durand Line was the legal border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. The following year in 1950, the Queen of England also recognized that the Durand Line was Pakistan’s international western border according to international law.

https://www.voj.news/the-durand-line-issue-from-a-historical-perspective/

 

[IceCold]

so many immature commentators on this incidence. Most are calling for war, to pound Afghanistan until all life ceases to exist. We should be thankful for smunshipall mercies, saner minds exists in GoP and PA. Making more enemies will not increase our security and will increase the number of people willing to attack PK. These rag-tags took an opportunity and took the lives of people busy doing their job securing our borders. We should learn from this and there should be a contingent that back our teams when in dangerous situations, we should employ small drones to keep an eye on the ground surround our jawans, and a quick response teams, maybe in a helicopter gunships that react instantly to such attacks that are stopped quickly and decisively.

There is nothing immature about it, this idiotic policy of restraint needs to be buried deep and Afghanistan needs to be dealt with an Iron hand. Your policy of appeasement hasnt worked till date and has only resulted in Pakistanis loosing lives due to either Afghan sponsored terrorism or attacks on our check post. Due to this very policy of yours and people like you, Pakistan has become a bloody joke. Nobody takes losers seriously and what you are suggesting above is a losers strategy and history is there to prove my point.

 

[Zhukov]

Ab to Charsi Force se bhi Jutian Parney Lag pari hain
God Bless Our Fortress of Islam

 

[Baghial]

It is extremely unfortunate that Pakistan has inherited the worst possible next door neighbor in Afghanistan.

well if we gave them some ghauri.s shaheen.s...up there dark tunnel.. we would not be seeing this day...
But man come with or without balls..
Just cant grow them later when in need...a nuclear country???

 

[Pakistani E]

If he said this, how do you know if he is not saying this as part of the propanganda warfare. Even Putin calls his American counterparts as friends and colleagues...

If that was ISPR's idea of propaganda, then it certainly worked. Not sure on charming the Afghans, but on the likes of me who's confidence in the leadership of the only institution I trust is waning and continues to take a nose dive with our cucked responses to aggression on every such occasion as mentioned in OP.