Flintlock
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2007
- Messages
- 6,176
- Reaction score
- 0
After the 2002 terrorist attack on Indian Parliament, India seriously considered preemptive strike on socalled terrorst camps in Pakistan, massed up 1 million troops along the border...even lead an overambitious anti-Pakistan comaign claiming that not Afghanistan but Pakistan was the center of global terorism and should be attacked.
With growing attacks on Pakistani soil we have a good case to start an active compaign against India and depand closure of some consulates near the border. If they're really meant to provide security to the Indian civil engineers and workers I'm sure Nato or UN can provide the umbrella.
India is not the only country to have a pre-emptive design, we have a worked out strategy of our own.
Well, there is of course the minor issue of Pakistan's credibility being far lower than that of India at the moment....and not without due reasons.
Frankly, it does not matter how many consulates India has in Afghanistan - I fail to see how demanding the closure of these "consulates" is going to help things at all.
India obviously has a heavy intelligence presence in Afghanistan, but that doesn't automatically make it guilty of supporting terrorism.
With NATO eyes constantly surveying everything on the border, you really think that India would manage to get away with running a large-scale terrorist operation there?
It has been proved beyond doubt that Pakistan has supported terrorists. There is sufficient intel available to go around. Where is the evidence that India is supporting terrorists?