Afghan Taliban in Kabul; Amnesty announced and Interim setup rumored

[Adecypher]

View attachment 770096

NEVER MIND
China, Russia, Turkey and Pakistan WILL BE 1ST TO accept Taliban rule of Afghanistan...

DOES IT MAKE U WONDER , WHY CHINA AND RUSSIA/ THE KAFIRS,!!!

I don't care who and in what order accept Taliban ... my ONLY concern is peace and security to prevail in Pakistan going forward...

 

[Tom_Cruise]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1426989318548119554

https://twitter.com/x/status/1427008426748620800

Wow, how did so many people spill over onto the tarmac? Are they just trying to jump onto any plane? Looks totally f*cked up, no security. Idiots can throw all sorts of objects onto the surface and even into the aircraft engines. Complete chaos.

 

[GiantPanda]

Yeah, it's not Vietnam according to Blinken but then again Saigon fell two years after US troops withdrawal.

Kabul fell during US withdrawal.

 

[Meengla]

 

[beijingwalker]

A US backed puppet state falls like a house of cards in merely days.

 

[ghazi52]

Afghanistan is now de facto governed by the (as of yet) diplomatically unrecognized Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, following the fall of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan today, on the 15th of August, 2021.

 

[PakFactor]

How the New US-Afghanistan Peace Deal Rekindled a “Business Friendly Taliban”

America’s relationship with the Taliban has always been determined by how useful they are at advancing US interests in the region and the Trump administration’s recent efforts to make “peace” with the group are no exception.




In examining the history of the U.S.-Taliban relationship, it becomes apparent that the U.S. was eager to support the Taliban until they presented hurdles to U.S. corporate interests, particularly oil and pipeline projects, and the interests of the U.S. intelligence community, especially with respect to the opium trade. As the war in Afghanistan has dragged on, the Taliban has sent signal after signal that they are willing to be “pro-business”, as seen in their support of the TAPI pipeline, and even willing to share revenue from both legitimate and illegitimate economic activities with the U.S.-backed government of Ashraf Ghani and the CIA and its Afghan paramilitaries.

From the U.S. perspective, returning U.S.-Taliban ties to where they were in 1996 would serve the Trump administration’s interests in Iran containment and its economic interests in Afghanistan. The U.S.-Taliban relationship has always been determined by the group’s convenience to U.S. interests. Thus, efforts to make “peace” with the group will be guided by these very same factors, particularly given that a key player in this long-standing relationship — Zalmay Khalilzad — was the main U.S. negotiator of the deal. After the September 11 attacks, the effort was made to eradicate the Taliban, but since that effort has clearly failed, the U.S. now seeks to make them a business partner.

OPERATION CYCLONE..........

Khalilzad was also a key figure in the CIA-backed Operation Cyclone under the Carter administration and later the Reagan administration, where he personally helped greatly expand the controversial program. That operation created, armed and financed Afghanistan’s Mujahideen forces, which included the very individuals who would go on to create both Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. It is one of the longest and most expensive covert programs in the history of the CIA and also involved Saudi and Pakistani intelligence..............



In addition, Khalilzad, at the time Operation Cyclone was ongoing, was also the executive director of the Friends of Afghanistan, a “support group” for the Mujahideen, and is also a long-time member of the board of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), long labeled a CIA cut-out by critics.

Notably, the Taliban’s own top negotiator of this new “peace” deal, Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanekzai, was among those trained and armed as part of the Mujahideen force created during Operation Cyclone



SO IS IT SAFE TO SAY, THAT CIA WON AGAIN?.........IN AFGHANISTAN, WITH TALIBAN,S

How the New US-Afghanistan Peace Deal Rekindled a "Business Friendly Taliban"

How Trump's US-Afghanistan peace deal is likely to turn Afghanistan into a South-American-style narco-state run by the Taliban and a CIA-backed president.

www.mintpressnews.com

Now this is a funny media spin to save face, one would have to be retarded like the Indians to buy into this. As only an Indian will slurp this sort of nonsense like a 7/11 Slurpee and be like my white master can never go wrong.

NATO & Co. Gandos can’t take a loss respectfully.

 

[Saho]

Do Taliban actually themselves Taliban or is it just a Western term?

What are they going to call Afghanistan and what term do they refer to their president?

 

[Asian.Century]

 

[iLION12345_1]

Do Taliban actually themselves Taliban or is it just a Western term?

What are they going to call Afghanistan and what term do they refer to their president?

They call themselves the IEA. Islamic emirate of Afghanistan. They call their leader the Emir.

 

[Saho]

They call themselves the IEA. Islamic emirate of Afghanistan. They call their leader the Emir.

What does Taliban means?

 

[K_Bin_W]

What does Taliban means?

Taliban is plural for Talib which means a student. And word Talib comes for talab and talab means desire or thirst. Thirst for knowledge/education = talib = student

 

[NA71]

I have not found any references of this anywhere - where did you see this?

live on BBC around 2:30 pm yesterday.

 

[Saho]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1426763243893280769

 

[Falconless]

The scenes of the tarmac are worrying, if the crowds can’t be managed the airport will be effectively closed.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1427187050168524802