In Afghanistan's ethnic compostion there is no majority and minority, although there is the largest and smallest groups which is quite different to the concept of majority and minority. Secondly, if you dont believe in this survey then present us with a survey which is more reliable to you? third: present gov of Afghanistan have more Pashtoon than other ethnic groups(if thats what you meant in your post), even if there is full pashtoon in the gov, it will be a nightmare for pakistan because they will shout for merging of NWFP to afghanistna while other ethnic groups never do such a thing. This poll was conducted by BBC in all provinces of the country and they chose people randomly.
I was not referring to just a single ethnic group. According to the CIA World Factbook, 42% of Afghans are Pashtun, while another ~ 15% are Uzbek, Turkmen and Baluch. These groups are more allied with the mainstream Pashtun elements. If you've noticed, the Pashtun Taliban are collaborating heavily with outlaw Uzbek elements. While this is unfortunate, it does point to certain ethnic groups being more on board with Pashtuns than others. It is this collective that is a majority in Afghanistan and it is not at all part of the current government. The Pashtun elements that are in the current Afghan government - including Karzai - are highly corrupt, not popular amongst the majority of Pashtuns in Afghanistan (and also amongst Pashtuns outside Afghanistan!) and devoid of any credibility. They have been deliberately placed for 'show' and to address concerns that the Pashtun have been evicted from mainstream power in Afghanistan. The veil is thin, however. We all know that Karzai is President because he has been propped up by an external power and not because he is genuinely representative of the Pashtuns of Afghanistan or popular in any way. In fact, even his own financiers and political backers recently alleged that he rigged the recent presidential election.
If you think about it, this recent election is in fact a clear indication of how biased and unrepresentative the current setup really is. Afghanistan - which is unfortunately split along ethnic lines thanks partially to years of infighting post Soviet withdrawl - would NEVER vote Abdullah Abdullah to the Presidency. Abdullah is supported by a very small minority of Afghans. Yet, the allegations were that the election was rigged to allow Karzai to win whereas Abdullah would have won if the conduct was "free and fair". Think about this. This means that the entire setup in Afghanistan is a farce today... If the majority of votes are in Abdullah Abdullah's favour, it means that the majority of the people of Afghanistan have been excluded from the polls. If a real free and fair election were conducted, a representative Pashtun/Uzbek mix would come to power. Not a fringe player like Abdullah Abdullah.
This poll was conductec by the BBC, who is in the gov and who is not shouldnt matter here. by the way, present gov of afghanistan have more pashtoons than other ethnic groups. the other ethnic groups make up the largest opposition to this gov. and it is also wrong to say that massive areas of afghanistan is no go area. yes, there are alot of explosions, but to say it is no go area is totally wrong.
I've addressed the issue of Pashtun participation in the current government above.
On the subject of the credibility of the poll, of course it makes a difference who is in government! Do you think the BBC ventured into "Taliban" territory, which is the majority of Afghanistan? Do you think the government of Afghanistan - which is universally accepted as being incredibly corrupt - would not sway this poll in their favour? Very naive thought, if so.
in present history of afghanistan people have always seen pakistan not trustwhorthy at least for the last 30 years. power of the gov is not important here, because it is saying about people's opinoin. surely if there is a gov of Mullah Omar, the gov(not people) will praise their pakistani masters.
Not at all. The people of Afghanistan have always been very friendly to Pakistan. The fact is that the communist government in Afghanistan (pre-soviet invasion), was allied with the Soviet Union, which was in turn unfriendly to Pakistan. During this time, the majority of the people of Afghanistan were actually against this government. If this were not so, you would not have seen the entire country rise up against Najibullah and his Soviet masters. Therefore, the anti-Pakistan stance of the Afghan government during this time was not representative of the will or opinion of the Afghan people. Prior to this, during the Zahir Shah government, ties were mostly fine - the only issue was the Durand line - and that too was a far, far smaller issue than say Rann of Kuch or Kashmir. The fact that Pakistan has *always* looked upon its western border as one where it could place its important military assets securely, away from India, should indicate to you that Afghanistan was never perceived as a real threat.
And prior to the Zahir Shah government, there is really not much difference between the Afghans and much of Pakistan. We share a common heritage and in fact, much of the blood that runs in the veins of many Pakistanis is Turko-mongol and Afghan blood.
The only time there has been any Pak-Afghan issue is when there has been an unrepresentative government in Kabul conspiring with a foreign power (e.g. the Soviet Union) to undermine the aspirations of the Afghan people. A truly democratically elected government in Afghanistan - today or in any decade past - would be friendly to Pakistan. You just have to know the people to figure that out...