What's new

Afghan ‘Peace Plan’ Revealed In Leaked Document

Kailash Kumar

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 8, 2018
Messages
4,643
Reaction score
-1
Country
Suriname
Location
Netherlands
Afghan ‘Peace Plan’ Revealed In Leaked Document

By Tamim Hamid

TODAY

TOLOnews has seen a detailed document that has been prepared as a potential peace agreement between the United States, the Taliban and the Afghan government.

US-based research center The RAND Corporation has developed the draft agreement and the document has been shared with several senior Afghan officials and politicians in Kabul as well stakeholders in the region.

The 49-page document titled “Agreement on a Comprehensive Settlement of the Conflict in Afghanistan” details proposals regarding a final peace agreement for Afghanistan at the end of a negotiating process.

Based on the document, a core bargain involving both the internal and external parties includes a declaration of a ceasefire, Taliban’s complete renunciation of links with the terrorist organizations, complete, phased ending of the current US and NATO military mission over an 18-month transitional time period.

The document suggests that the Afghan parties may invite the international community to form a small, limited “Afghanistan Support Team” focused exclusively on counter-terrorism.

According to the document, the new political arrangements within Afghanistan will include adoption of a new constitution within the 18-month transitional period. The transitional government to be led by a rotating chairman and several vice chairmen, the document suggests.

Presidential system with “somewhat reduced powers for the president” and increased balancing of presidential power compared to the current system is suggested as the future government model.

“Parties commit to an immediate, mutual, and comprehensive ceasefire and cessation of hostilities, effective upon signature of this agreement,” reads the document.

“The Islamic Movement of the Afghan Taliban renounces unequivocally and permanently any form of links with, including providing any form of support to or receiving any form of support from, any terrorist groups, including Al Qaeda and any of its branches or related groups. The Afghan parties shall prevent any use of the territory or airspace of Afghanistan in any manner that threatens the security of any other state.”

The document suggests that the United States and NATO shall end their current military missions in Afghanistan and withdraw all their personnel in three phases, over an expected period of 18 months, but adding that the US civilian cooperation should continue in Afghanistan post deal.

The document says that Afghanistan’s security institutions such as the Afghan Army, border police and intelligence services will operate under national commands while police would be localized in order to create space for "localized solutions".

The Afghan government says only Afghans are authorized to discuss a peace deal with the Taliban and decide on the future political system.

“Any decision regarding the peace process in Afghanistan is supposed to be the authority of the Afghan government and the Afghan people. The US and regional countries are only facilitating the peace process and they persuaded the Taliban to come and seal a peace deal with the Afghan government,” said Faraidoon Khozon, a spokesman for Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah.

The Rand Corporation was not immediately available to comment on the document. Sources suggest that the document is authored by former officials of the US government.

https://www.tolonews.com/afghanistan/afghan-‘peace-plan’-revealed-leaked-document
 
.
According to the document, the new political arrangements within Afghanistan will include adoption of a new constitution within the 18-month transitional period. The transitional government to be led by a rotating chairman and several vice chairmen, the document suggests.
In this purposed scenario there will be NO political stability in Afghanistan.
 
.
Afghan ‘Peace Plan’ Revealed In Leaked Document

By Tamim Hamid

TODAY

TOLOnews has seen a detailed document that has been prepared as a potential peace agreement between the United States, the Taliban and the Afghan government.

US-based research center The RAND Corporation has developed the draft agreement and the document has been shared with several senior Afghan officials and politicians in Kabul as well stakeholders in the region.

The 49-page document titled “Agreement on a Comprehensive Settlement of the Conflict in Afghanistan” details proposals regarding a final peace agreement for Afghanistan at the end of a negotiating process.

Based on the document, a core bargain involving both the internal and external parties includes a declaration of a ceasefire, Taliban’s complete renunciation of links with the terrorist organizations, complete, phased ending of the current US and NATO military mission over an 18-month transitional time period.

The document suggests that the Afghan parties may invite the international community to form a small, limited “Afghanistan Support Team” focused exclusively on counter-terrorism.

According to the document, the new political arrangements within Afghanistan will include adoption of a new constitution within the 18-month transitional period. The transitional government to be led by a rotating chairman and several vice chairmen, the document suggests.

Presidential system with “somewhat reduced powers for the president” and increased balancing of presidential power compared to the current system is suggested as the future government model.

“Parties commit to an immediate, mutual, and comprehensive ceasefire and cessation of hostilities, effective upon signature of this agreement,” reads the document.

“The Islamic Movement of the Afghan Taliban renounces unequivocally and permanently any form of links with, including providing any form of support to or receiving any form of support from, any terrorist groups, including Al Qaeda and any of its branches or related groups. The Afghan parties shall prevent any use of the territory or airspace of Afghanistan in any manner that threatens the security of any other state.”

The document suggests that the United States and NATO shall end their current military missions in Afghanistan and withdraw all their personnel in three phases, over an expected period of 18 months, but adding that the US civilian cooperation should continue in Afghanistan post deal.

The document says that Afghanistan’s security institutions such as the Afghan Army, border police and intelligence services will operate under national commands while police would be localized in order to create space for "localized solutions".

The Afghan government says only Afghans are authorized to discuss a peace deal with the Taliban and decide on the future political system.

“Any decision regarding the peace process in Afghanistan is supposed to be the authority of the Afghan government and the Afghan people. The US and regional countries are only facilitating the peace process and they persuaded the Taliban to come and seal a peace deal with the Afghan government,” said Faraidoon Khozon, a spokesman for Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah.

The Rand Corporation was not immediately available to comment on the document. Sources suggest that the document is authored by former officials of the US government.

https://www.tolonews.com/afghanistan/afghan-‘peace-plan’-revealed-leaked-document
And how is this ''rotation'' system going to work?
Democratic for some time untill the ''rotation'',then theocratic?
 
.
In this purposed scenario there will be NO political stability in Afghanistan.

It might.

But, if every party is represented by one person who will lead the transitional government for a certain time as a (rotating) chairman, then all of the people represented by these parties will see their party leader as chairman and they will feel represented.
If only one party would have provided a person to be chairman, then other parties and the people they represent would not feel represented and this could be a problem for them and the stability of the government.

Also during the time that one leader from a party is the chairman, while the others are vice-chairmen, they can make sure, together, that the current rotating chairman will not only impose (all of) his own ideas or that from his party. The vice-chairmen are a check on the power of the rotating chairman.

The fact that it is a rotating system is also a check on the power of the chairman.

And how is this ''rotation'' system going to work?
Democratic for some time untill the ''rotation'',then theocratic?

I think it wil be like the chairmanship of European countries in the European Union.
They have some power, but most (important) ideas will have to be made together (with the vice-chairmen and within a certain framework).
This would limit the power of a theocratic chairman, who wants to impose all of his (religious) ideas on the rest.
 
Last edited:
.
But, if every party is represented by one person who will lead the transitional government for a certain time as a (rotating) chairman, then all of the people respresented by these parties will see their party leader as chairman and they will feel represented.
Never ...... history will repeat itself, even IF Taliban agree to this setup. We in past have witnessed civil war because of the same sort of arrangement for Rabbani and Hekmatyar which resulted the upraising of Afghan Taliban
 
.
I think it wil be like the chairmanship of European countries in the European Union.
They have some power, but most (important) ideas will have to be made together (with the vice-chairmen and within a certain framework).
This would limit the power of a theocratic chairman, who wants to impose all of his (religious) ideas on the rest.
What do you think,will it be one constitution for all or something like India where some provines/regions(maybe all) have their own laws(sharia) but on state level,secular?
 
.
What do you think,will it be one constitution for all or something like India where some provines/regions(maybe all) have their own laws(sharia) but on state level,secular?

I think you are refering to Indonesia where Sharia is followed in Aceh state but rest is Secular
 
.
What do you think,will it be one constitution for all or something like India where some provines/regions(maybe all) have their own laws(sharia) but on state level,secular?

I think it might be one constitution for all with a foundation in Islamic law.
Next to that, there could also be exceptions or additions to this law based on tribal, ethnic and religious affliations.
 
Last edited:
. . . . .
Looks like even a verbal "YES" would suffice for Uncle Trump!!! He can't care less, nor does the US folks....

You should know the abc of geopolitics, the US's interest is to continue their military presence in Afghanistan and we have convergence of interests there until there is a strong national security apparatus.

Sorry to break it to you, but seems your investments on bearded barbarians didnt pay off in Syria as well, seems Asad is here to stay on your flank!! Bet that keeps you awake at night.
 
.
You should know the abc of geopolitics, the US's interest is to continue their military presence in Afghanistan and we have convergence of interests there until there is a strong national security apparatus.

Sorry to break it to you, but seems your investments on bearded barbarians didnt pay off in Syria as well, seems Asad is here to stay on your flank!! Bet that keeps you awake at night.
Those investments in Syria were also the investments of the US. Do not forget that.
 
.
Those investments in Syria were also the investments of the US. Do not forget that.

In that case the Turkish clown should keep his mouth shut vis-a-vis Afghanistan and not take a moral high ground.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom