What's new

Afghan official says General Kayani used 'threatening language' in Brussels

Just my observation - the man on the left and the man in the center are really looking smart. No offense but Kayani's body posture just isn't that of a military man !!!

kayani is man not a Robot
kayani.jpg


Do you knw wht this expression shows it says Dont You F.... WITH ME
 
.
May be true time will tell. I know our borders get more secure everyday. The frustrated Jihad-e-Kashmir 2.0 agitators may again come home to roost. Like I said time will tell.

I don't know how much you're aware of internal Pakistani politics but today the 2 of the 3 frontline parties to win the May 2013 General Elections are Pakistan Muslim League (N) and Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf. Both are Fiscal Conservative parties or I should say rather just Conservative parties.

Both parties are heavily nationalistic enjoying wide public support, while Pakistan Muslim League (N) in addition also enjoys wide backing of various religious parties and a huge number of Islamic movements throughout the country. They're more like the soft version of Islamic Brotherhood of North Africa.

Now, it was the Pakistan Muslim League (N)'s leader Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in the 1990s who recognised the Taliban Government in Afghanistan, heavily backed the Kashmir Freedom Struggle against India, conducted nuclear tests and also unde his tenure the Kargil Conflict occurred.

What I am trying to say is that as Afghanistan is most likely to be taken over the Taliban, Pakistan for obvious reasons is going to be lead by a political party who can also talk and recognise the Taliban, therefore, Pakistan Muslim League (N) is most likely to win more seats than any other party.

Separately, I'm not sure if many people understand why America is most likely to support the Taliban. It's mainly because the Taliban respect and listen to Saudi Arabia and absolutely hate Iran. Any anti-Iranian government in Afghanistan is in West's interest according to their perverted worldview. Therefore in order to give some legitimacy to Taliban, Pakistani support for them is very crucial. You can probably sense where this is heading to.

Today, West is slowly removing India from the Afghan picture as they no longer need them while Pakistan is being allowed a free hand in Afghanistan. Once the likes of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) see these two countries as being ruled by Muslim governments, their policy will automatically change. On one hand, they'll be too busy trying to overthrow the Afghan government along with the Taliban in their newfound Jihad and at the same time they'll be catapulted into Indian Occupied kashmir to keep the Indian Army checked there while Afghanistan goes through a cleansing.

Here's what you already know and what you're going to see more of.

During 2013, you're going to hear of isolated incidents in the Indian Occupied Kashmir where on average, one Indian soldier is killed each month - blamed on Pakistan backed fighters or Pakistan soldiers. This way, the Kashmiri Struggle will slowly be re-introduced to the Indians (this is already happening). Of course, Pakistan don't want to cause panic in India as 80,000 Pakistani soldiers are currently manning the Afghan border when should be in Kashmir so the war machine will take couple of years to warm up.

Then during 2014, the pace of soldier being killed in the Indian Occupied Kashmir is going to pick up with an average of at least one Indian soldier getting killed each week instead of the current rate of one per month. Finally, come 2015 and beyond the Kashmir Uprising will most probably be in full swing.

This is what the retired Pakistani military men and analysts have been predicting for the last couple of years and unbelievably this is how things appear to be unfolding.

I could be wrong. Allahu Alam.
 
.
Karzai beta this is nothing .... not even threatening... abhe game shuru nahe hoi teri pehlay nikal gaye hey... those who are using you and your country ******* do do takay kay with the help of Afghanistan puppet govt and creating so called consulates along border.... we know how to teach these kuta bila and your govt... isay pehlay ke teri **** lagay you, Afghanistan and your co-party will b ***** up!~

If you feel Kiyani Threatening you actually that's the only way you understand....
 
.
Very silly to use threatening language against Afghanistan at this point of time. :agree:

Solidarity with the Afghan victims :tup:

Very interesting. How come you don't show solidarity to Christians and Muslims killed by your fundamental hindu parties?
How come you don't show 'solidarity' to women who were raped in hundreds, kids dead and elderly beaten, threaten and killed for many years now by your own army in Kashmir.....are these any less humans than the dear Afghans?
 
.
Pakistan has used the same tone with India on more then one occasion when your generals were having wet dreams most recently after 26/11 and the only trouble we got into was.........NOTHING. As for Iran, why would we use such tone with Iran. Pakistan has good relations with Iran Hint IP project. As for Afghanistan, you have no stake in it, you are just an Irk which will be removed pretty soon. Mind you Pakistan used the tone in the presence of US Secretary of state. Now what does that tell you?

You seem to be under some very flawed perception about India and US.
Indian Prime Minister has never met Pakistan CoAs. Pakistan PM and president come to meet and talk with indian PM. Pakistan knows full well what the consequences of Pakistan army chief talking in a remotely un diplomatic manner with Indian PM would be.

Random statements that your coas gives to gullible Pakistanis about some imagined military prowess of Pakistan and islam does not mean talking to Indian cabinet in a rude tone let alone the PM directly.

As far as US is concerned US bombs Pakistan on a daily basis and Pakistan arky depemds on hand me downs from US and you think kayani can threaten the President of United States?

Pakistan is unfortunate that all its neighbours barring Afghanistan are stronger than Pakistan militarily, economically and diplomatically.
 
.
You seem to be under some very flawed perception about India and US.
Indian Prime Minister has never met Pakistan CoAs. Pakistan PM and president come to meet and talk with indian PM. Pakistan knows full well what the consequences of Pakistan army chief talking in a remotely un diplomatic manner with Indian PM would be.

Random statements that your coas gives to gullible Pakistanis about some imagined military prowess of Pakistan and islam does not mean talking to Indian cabinet in a rude tone let alone the PM directly.

As far as US is concerned US bombs Pakistan on a daily basis and Pakistan arky depemds on hand me downs from US and you think kayani can threaten the President of United States?

Pakistan is unfortunate that all its neighbours barring Afghanistan are stronger than Pakistan militarily, economically and diplomatically.

Your rant started off with teaching off Pakistani COAS a lesson and now you are talking nonsense with no value to your original teaching the lesson thingy. Neither did i said anything about your singh meeting our COAS all i said that Pakistan has used the same tone with India too which you refer to as aggressive tone when the need arises. You have zero understanding of how and when aggressive body language is used to convey your message across. Every nation does that and so did Pakistan. Karzai has been involved in pretty harsh language against Pakistan but of course you have missed that, it was about time we put him in his place.

As far as US is concerned US bombs Pakistan on a daily basis and Pakistan arky depemds on hand me downs from US and you think kayani can threaten the President of United States?

Now you are definitely high on something and imaging things. Good day:wave:
 
.
Your rant started off with teaching off Pakistani COAS a lesson and now you are talking nonsense with no value to your original teaching the lesson thingy. Neither did i said anything about your singh meeting our COAS all i said that Pakistan has used the same tone with India too which you refer to as aggressive tone when the need arises. You have zero understanding of how and when aggressive body language is used to convey your message across. Every nation does that and so did Pakistan. Karzai has been involved in pretty harsh language against Pakistan but of course you have missed that, it was about time we put him in his place.


Now you are definitely high on something and imaging things. Good day:wave:
I was talking about how dare a Pakistan military chief threaten a serving president of a soverign country. It is disgraceful.
 
.
I was talking about how dare a Pakistan military chief threaten a serving president of a soverign country. It is disgraceful.

And the Pakistani chief just did that and that too in the presence of US sec of State. Now deal with it.
 
.
And the Pakistani chief just did that and that too in the presence of US sec of State. Now deal with it.

Please give links stating that Pakistan army chief threatened US sec of state. The word here is threatened.

As far as Afghanistan is concerned...Pakistan will only be able to get away with it till Afghanistan national army becomes a powerful force in its own right. Just shows how Pakistan is trying to bully the one state weaker than Pakistan in its neighbourhood.
 
.
Afghan Victims oka thats strange Bcz Pakistan has the worlds biggest refugee camp if we are giving them refugee how come we became their oppressor isnt that idiotic

I take that you know why those afghans became refugee and why after the withdrawal of Russian military forces, the majority of afghans couldn't return to their home country.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom