What's new

Afghan NSA calls Taliban Pak agent, say country wouldn't accept being ruled by proxy of backward Pak

Can someone tell him Pakistan not only feeds its own 220 million population but also feeds millions of afghan refugees, that too for almost 4 decades. If u dig, his own family might have been fed by Pakistan.

Its also funny american and indian agents calling taliban Pakistani agents.
 
. .
This Mohib guy is an immature idiot. If the Taliban indeed were Pakistani proxies then Taliban would have signed the durand line agreement, their senior leadership wouldn't have been imprisoned by Pakistan or killed. The fact is that Taliban are the product of their environment and time who arose due to the lack of rule of law and barbarism of some so called jihadi leaders after the collapse of Najeebullah's government. Taliban enjoy wide spread support among conservative rural Afghans who have been neglected by central government or where the central government has no control. The Pakistani Taliban alliance is a marriage of interests, not ideology. The Taliban and Pakistani establishment are poles apart on their interpretation of Islam although one can't deny there are certain minority groups within Pak establishment who have a soft spot for Taliban. Those who call Taliban proxies of Pakistan give Pakistan too much credit that they don't deserve.
This mohib guy was raised in the UK and has no idea of ground reality and facts in Afghanistan. He lives in a bubble and he might be sincere in his beliefs but nonetheless he is wrong.
well he is married to US national once things are bad....he will pack up and leave
 
.
I didn't know Afghanistan is more Advance than Germany and Japan .. well why don't they take their people back to their super Advance Wakanda ?I am sure Pakistan cannot feed them but Afghanistan can .
 
.
Laanat on PAkistan Govt. and foreign office, this representative [from the powerless kabul govt.] needs to be banned and curbs should be put on Afghan govt. to apologize.

Shame on Imran Khan and the rest of Pakistan Govt. fo their silence on Afghan's stupid upmanship and insults.

Nothing surprising anymore Pakistanis beghairat govt. stays silent while Indian Govt. invites ethnic Tajiks or hazaras to abuse Pakistan on their platforms in return for grand welcome and some dog biscuits.
 
.
Laanat on PAkistan Govt. and foreign office, this representative [from the powerless kabul govt.] needs to be banned and curbs should be put on Afghan govt. to apologize.

Shame on Imran Khan and the rest of Pakistan Govt. fo their silence on Afghan's stupid upmanship and insults
LOL he banned from meeting US official and i think even banned to enter DC.
 
.
LOL he banned from meeting US official and i think even banned to enter DC.

So this allows out govt. to stay silent and not rebut this Afghan puppet?

Rabid Thinktank Council of Foreign Relations is turning out to be a branch of indian media.
Its platform is being used to gather anything against Pakistan to help Indian propaganda on Kashmir.
So there is clear agenda by a US thinktank Concil on Foreign Relations
The stupid Foreign Office of Pakistan and Pakistani mission in US sp. that jacka** Shah Mehmood Qureshi should be taken to task why on earth was Imran Khan arranged to go to CFR, a very dumb decision.

It was the most hostile Q&As for Imran Khan in US, he was cornered and forced to make statements which were later used by Indian media and Indian Govt. to tie terrorist organization and Bin Laden to Pakistan. Again CFR has given podium for more anti-Pakistan speech. Pakistani Foreign office needs to grow a brain. Check these 2 interviews and compare the attitude and questions directed at Imran Khan compared to that loser China expert india's External Affairs minister Jaishankar. Check the host who interviewed and the audience questions. Very brief mention on Kashmir while Imran Khan was asked about Chinese minority issues also. Shows poor planning by our Pakistani embassy

India's Minister on Council on Foreign Relations

Pakistan's Prime Minister Imran Khan on Council on Foreign relations, the most hostile interview in US with host firewalling Imran Khan from speaking on Kashmir
 
.
This is video of his statement I am sure:

He also told Indian journalists that with Amrullah Saleh most likely to become Vice President of Afghanistan, Indo-Afghan relations will improve further.
If our proxy can defeat USA, than we must be more powerful than USA. And the guy in video will, anyway runaway from Afghanistan soon, so we don't mind whatever he says.
 
.
If I am not wrong, Taliban went to or contacted Russia right after the deal was cancelled? Did Afghan govt utter something against Russia?
 
. . .
This Mohib guy is an immature idiot. If the Taliban indeed were Pakistani proxies then Taliban would have signed the durand line agreement, their senior leadership wouldn't have been imprisoned by Pakistan or killed. The fact is that Taliban are the product of their environment and time who arose due to the lack of rule of law and barbarism of some so called jihadi leaders after the collapse of Najeebullah's government. Taliban enjoy wide spread support among conservative rural Afghans who have been neglected by central government or where the central government has no control. The Pakistani Taliban alliance is a marriage of interests, not ideology. The Taliban and Pakistani establishment are poles apart on their interpretation of Islam although one can't deny there are certain minority groups within Pak establishment who have a soft spot for Taliban. Those who call Taliban proxies of Pakistan give Pakistan too much credit that they don't deserve.
This mohib guy was raised in the UK and has no idea of ground reality and facts in Afghanistan. He lives in a bubble and he might be sincere in his beliefs but nonetheless he is wrong.

Good to see other Afghans that share the same view. After the recently failed peace talks, more and more of our watandars have come to realise that the government is just an American stooge, so their only excuse is "Pakistan proxy, ISI proxy" when that's far from the reality.

In general however, I've come to found out that the more religious our Afghans are the more they support the Taliban have, the less religious they are the fewer support they have. The day the Taliban are no more in Afghanistan is the day Islam has lost the battle in Afghanistan and will become an Atheist state in the near future.
 
.
His comments should be seen in context of fact that Khalilzad is today going to deliver letters to Pak & Taliban from SecState Pompeo that says US will restart peace talks with Taliban only if Taliban agrees to immediately begin talks with Afghan govt & agrees to significantly reduce attacks on ANDSF & civilians + NATO.

So now the Taliban has forced to encounter reality that without giving significant concession they will never get a peace deal.

If you learn & follow Afghan peace talks; Taliban has been saying the same thing to NATO/ANA to stop attacking hence, either parties continued without any change. US/NATO/ANA will have to agree to stop attacking Taliban as well. These so-called letters are not that you read somewhere. In reality, Ghani already lost election and Taliban did not count Afghan Government as legitimate authority, therefore, they clearly denied to talk with puppet regime before signing the deal with US, the real handlers of Kabul.
 
.
Funny part is that he and his gov is a puppet clearly in bed with Indians. No one listens to them in Afghanistan.
 
.
"If we did not accept Soviet rule as a superpower, it would be beyond imagination to accept the proxy of a backward country which has a hard time feeding its own people," he added.

Mohib said that Afghanistan refused to accept the rule of Soviet Union -- which "were much better than the Taliban in the sense that "they were not destroying wedding halls at least" -- because Afghans would never submit to "any kind of enforced ideology or rule"

"We could have submitted if it was about submission to an idea into a superpower, who wanted us to accept a certain way of life. We could have done that with the soviet union," he said. "They were much better than the Taliban, they were not destroying wedding halls at least... they are building infrastructure in our country at least... but the Afghans would not submit to any kind enforced ideology or rule on our country."

What kind of afghan he is? It looks like there are many type of afghans. The ones who openly invite foreign intervention to safeguard their interests and those who fight them. Soviets were also accepted by certain Afghans.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom