What's new

Afghan Casualties Surge 31% as Taliban Digs In, U.S. Seeks Exit

CrazyZ

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 3, 2019
Messages
4,617
Reaction score
2
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Afghan Casualties Surge 31% as Taliban Digs In, U.S. Seeks Exit
By
Glen Carey
April 30, 2019, 11:59 PM EDT Updated on May 1, 2019, 12:06 PM EDT

  • Afghan troops struggle to dislodge Taliban, Pentagon finds

  • Pentagon signals it will provide less information in future
1000x-1.jpg

A resident looks through broken windows near the site of a truck bomb attack in Kabul, Jan. 2019. Photographer: Wakil Kohsar/AFP via Getty Images
Afghanistan’s government is making no headway in rolling back territory controlled by the Taliban, a Pentagon watchdog found, even as the Trump administration tries to negotiate a peace agreement that would let the U.S. withdraw troops after 18 years of war.

Afghan army casualty rates, an erosion of force levels and increased civilian deaths at the hands of U.S. and Afghan forces are all preventing President Ashraf Ghani’s government from breaking a stalemate with the Taliban. Both sides have incurred “more casualties as they seek greater leverage at the negotiating table,” according to the latest assessment by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction.

Casualties among Afghan National Defense and Security Forces rose 31 percent from December 2018 to February 2019 over the same period a year earlier, while troop levels fell short again of authorized strength for the first quarter of this year.

“If negotiators fail to secure a peace agreement, the ANDSF will be hard pressed to increase its control over Afghanistan’s population, districts, and territory,” the inspector general said. From November 2016 through October 2018, “the Afghan government controlled or influenced between 64 percent and 66 percent of the population.”

The quarterly report highlighted that the U.S. military formally notified the Pentagon watchdog that it is no longer producing its district-level stability assessment of Afghan government and insurgent control and influence over territory. That will limit the ability of the inspector general to gauge the success of U.S. efforts on the ground.

Despite some limitations, the control data was the only unclassified metric “that consistently tracked changes to the security situation on the ground,” the watchdog said. “While the data did not on its own indicate the success or failure of the South Asia strategy, it did contribute to an overall understanding of the situation in the country.”

The inspector general’s assessment comes as President Donald Trump seeks to find a way to get U.S. troops out of Afghanistan -- and out of what’s become America’s longest war. That would require a breakthrough brokered by his administration’s special envoy on Afghan reconciliation, Zalmay Khalilzad, who has been speaking separately with Taliban and Afghani officials in search of a solution.

Read more: Afghan, NATO Forces Kill More Afghans Than Taliban in 3 Months

“We are working to achieve a reconciliation so that this conflict, now coming on two decades, can be resolved,” Secretary of State Michael Pompeo said Monday in Washington. “We can take down the violence level, we can get a political outcome.” A necessary condition for the U.S. to end its involvement is being able to prevent “an attack on the homeland from Afghanistan,” Pompeo said.

Negotiations between Khalilzad and the Taliban in Qatar have centered on a withdrawal of foreign troops from Afghanistan in exchange for Taliban pledges not to let terrorist groups such as Islamic State and al-Qaeda operate from the country. The Taliban, ousted when U.S. troops arrived in Afghanistan after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, have refused to speak with Ghani’s government so far.

Integrating Taliban
Another obstacle for peace will be transitioning about 60,000 Taliban fighters to a sustainable livelihood and peacefully reintegrate them into Afghan society, the inspector general cautioned.

“Successfully reintegrating these tens of thousands of former fighters into society -- a complex and long-term process with social, economic, political, security, and humanitarian dimensions -- will be critical for Afghanistan to achieve lasting peace and stability,” the report said.

If peace is finally reached, it may lead to an erosion in women’s rights, according to the report.



“The prospect of a peace agreement with the Taliban raises new concerns about the sustainability of the gains Afghan women have made over the past 17 years,” the inspector general said. “The Taliban regime from 1996 to 2001 was notorious for its brutality against women. Some experts believe that a precipitous withdrawal of U.S. forces could lead to the deterioration of political and economic freedoms, however limited, currently enjoyed by women in Afghanistan.”

— With assistance by Eltaf Najafizada

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...ble-to-dislodge-taliban-as-u-s-looks-for-exit
 
.
Where are those mentally retards who are saying uncle sam is winning the war in Afghanistan
 
.
Then some people have the audacity of accusing the Pakistani state of bending over to US ambitions in Afghanistan.
 
.
I have watched some videos recorded by taliban attacking on afghan convoys and i think its safe to say that they are very good in planning a coordinated attack , in the video that i watched they burned down several afghan oil tankers ....
First tanker gets hit at 3:14
This one is pretty neat too ....
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom