What's new

Advanced equipment is being purchased for the Air Force: Law Minister

Yes, Japan, Taiwan, Korea, Saudi Arabia, and a hundred other countries play only a secondary role with the USA. What do you want BD to play? A main role King? No, Sir, we cannot. Let India try it with its 120 Crore illiterate population.

I think the way the Indian economy is run by that Chaiwala Modi, it will soon become a third rate country without receiving respects from other countries and as a result, it will fall off the chessboard and we will take over the place. It is already happening.


I think helicopters have many other functions that cannot be readily accomplished by drones.

120 crores illiterate??? Are you out of your mind???

And lol to your economic progress and dreams of replacing India....

Chaar din chandani ke aur baki khairat ke.... :lol:
 
. .
Are you a dumbo??? We had war with China in 1962 and stand off in 2017 in doklam... we are enemies.... will they sell us their high tech platforms even if we ask?? Will we buy even if they offer us knowing fully that those platforms won't work against China?? Go and see psychiatrist before asking such idiot questions...
Same between India and Bangladesh. We conducted “surgical strike in the 80s” in India against rebels that were involved with Chittagong hill tracts fighting... we fought you guys in border skirmishes multiple times. We aren’t friends either. Your ultimate goal was to annex bd but failed thanks to American pressure
 
. .
Absolutely agree. There is no point getting PT-6 (I am still not sure if BAF will buy them). Instead, the one you proposed or any other western trainers could fit well (riding on the assumption that we will get US jets). We should have actually negotiated some trainers with them or some European ones that could have been also used for light attack purpose.

There was an aircraft that was below the Yak 130 called the Yak 152 (made by Irkut Corp.) that was supposed to be a JV development with the Chinese (same factory that makes the PT-6). They are still working the kinks and bugs out I guess....


Radial engine China version
iu

iu


Inline engine Russian version (a diesel engine is also offered)
iu


iu


The tail shapes in the China version a bit more modern.
 
.
Absolutely agree. There is no point getting PT-6 (I am still not sure if BAF will buy them). Instead, the one you proposed or any other western trainers could fit well (riding on the assumption that we will get US jets). We should have actually negotiated some trainers with them or some European ones that could have been also used for light attack purpose.
There's actually very good point buying them. They are dirt cheap & we produce all the necessary spairs so BAF technicians can repair them without any external support.

All they need is a bit of tweaking to make their avionics upto the mark.
 
.
There's actually very good point buying them. They are dirt cheap & we produce all the necessary spairs so BAF technicians can repair them without any external support.

All they need is a bit of tweaking to make their avionics upto the mark.

Is it possible to fit ejection seats in them? We lost many cadets in this junk.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom