Patriot forever
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2020
- Messages
- 3,375
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
The chart I posted wasn’t actually in reply to your comments, but yes you have read it correctly. My purpose was to show that money supply growth was well managed and no money printing was used as some form of monetary stimulus.
OT: One of the biggest lessons from this latest crisis should be the importance of central bank independence. Which is practised everywhere in the world, and guarded with utmost importance. It should be codified in our laws that SBP operates without political interference, and SBP should be given a strict mandate of sustaining price stability, with secondary considerations of output. Finance ministers and governments should have no say.
Well if we look at the graph, we have to couple the linear graph (in end of tenure of Plmn and start of pti) with interest rate. In Plmn it was a lot less around 8% than in pti which hit 14%. So major portion was spent in interest payment as compared to government spending (monetary stimulus) in Plmn end days. Otherwise it would show a spike. Interest payment is a huge component of budget.
Yes central bank absolute independence is a must but it comes at a cost of political capital. A lot of major reforms in that direction has been taken ultimately we will achieve that.
Last edited: