I couldn't have said it better.
The other column: Outsourcing balls
Ejaz Haider
March 22, 2009
Two developments have restored my faith in Pakistans future. No, I am not referring to the great battle won by Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry and his lawyer cohorts. My optimism springs from the positive trend on display in Swat where the state, in keeping with the modern business strategy of outsourcing, has asked the reigning Islamic scholar, one Sufi Muhammad, to run the area as he pleases, thank you.
This is just the beginning. I am informed by the NWFP chief minister, Ameer Haider Hoti, that the nongovernment in Peshawar is giving a deep-think to the idea of subsequently extending this outsourcing to the rest of the province.
Mr Hoti is a smart man and he has the support in this venture of other smart men across Pakistan, most of them leaders of various political parties and the media. All of them believe in democracy and negotiations. Hoti can ultimately be the chief minister without having to lift a finger to do state work because all his functions, a la Swat, will have been outsourced. Reminds me of Bahadur Shah Zafar, except that Hoti, to my knowledge, cant even write bad poetry.
You want to look into the merits of this. Here goes.
Democracy is about the voice of the people; remember the old adage, vox populi, vox dei. If the people dont like the state to do its work, what should a benign, democratic state do but to bow to their wish and let them be ruled by those they want to be ruled by and through laws they prefer.
Of course, by the very logic of deregulation, or shall I say decentralisation, the outsourcing exercise cannot be consistent in its application of the laws or even the groups to which state work must be outsourced. Monopolies we dont want.
The Aurakzai Agency, for instance, will have its own ruling group and exegesis of shariat while we could contract in the Khyber Agency the group most powerful there.
This exercise could be replicated in other parts of NWFP and in the remaining tribal agencies.
Imagine the money we will save. Pakistan will have no need for a single, monolithic army that has been such a heavy burden on the exchequer. Within their respective areas, the ruling groups will run everything. Its almost like companies getting contracts for maintaining and streamlining parking space in front of shopping plazas or levying toll for the use of bridges and turnpikes etc.
What is so sanctimonious about central state control anyway? In fact, I am very seriously thinking of raising a militia and having my own local fiefdom by requesting the state to outsource its functions to me in the area that I could, so far theoretically, control.
My suggestion is that if this exercise succeeds in the NWFP, as it surely would, it may be extended to other parts of Pakistan. In some ways Pakistan has always been like this. Local control in interior Sindh; local control of a city like Karachi by the middle class; local control of areas in Balochistan by the democratic sardars; local control of Lahore by the democratic brothers and so on.
The future, dear reader, lies in the twin concepts of deregulation and outsourcing. If the model works in the realm of economy and business (the current trend towards governmental control is just a passing phase), why cant it be made to work in the political realm?
Ok, I know there is a bit of a problem when it comes to theories of state. Philosopher after philosopher has talked about the state as being the one entity that cannot be allowed to be outsourced.
They think that one of the foremost attributes of state is its monopoly of violence. To put this philosophical concept in plain Punjabi, the state must be able to teri maan di... anyone who challenges it.
Constitutional and juridical constraints may have changed the manner in which a state can do this but this attribute remains, whether it is to be exercised through exception, emergency, bio-power, bio-political or whatever else. The state ultimately embraces the living being in its most extreme form: it can and does kill.
For some scholars, this is what distinguishes the political from every other sphere of life, not just in terms of a mere distinction but by subjugating all other human activities individual and collective to the political.
But despair not. Truly democratic that we are, these concepts we do not believe in. The model we are putting in place is the one that liberates maybe not the people, but at least the present bunch of rulers. It liberates them from running the state.
As for what the groups contracted to do the states work will do, this is what will happen:
Because effective control requires that they make the political decision, they will kill when necessary. Each group will also consider the other the out-group. That means, yes, the friend-enemy distinction. They will fight until one group dominates and brings other areas under its control. That too is the attribute of a state.
Replicate this across Pakistan where chunks of territory have been outsourced to whoever could challenge the withering and withered state. The scenario that I can see is the emergence of a new state, ready to kill internally as well as externally. Talking of bio-power or bio-political, you cant get more bio-whatever than slitting peoples throats jugular backwards and then smiling on camera while holding aloft the severed head.
The damn philosophers are right after all. But dont worry. We shall do what liberal humanism suggests (who cares if our humanism springs from sh*tload of idiocy and the inability to run a state). What the groups do after we have entrusted them with the running of the state is their doing. I just bought a nice apartment in Park Avenue anyway.
They may kill but we abhor killing our own brothers. Plus, this business of running a state is kinda masculine. It involves having what the Italians euphemistically call attributi and plain English balls.
Since we dont have them, our model of outsourcing the state to those who have them is the only way out. The Lord be praised!
Ejaz Haider is Consulting Editor of The Friday Times and Op-Ed Editor of Daily Times.