What's new

Absolute hate mongering, unimaginable hatred being spewed by mainstream Indian media

Awesome

RETIRED MOD
Joined
Mar 24, 2006
Messages
22,023
Reaction score
5
8 things India Inc, govt must do against Pakistan

Some of this is quite shocking and disgusting.

The three-day-long terror strike on the country's financial capital was devastating in terms of its reach and impact. It has left Corporate India badly shaken and the elites numb.

It is no more about bombs being thrown at bus stations or trains getting blasted. It is no longer about only Nagpada or Govindpuri residents losing limbs and lives. Terror has now climbed up the value chain.

As the new age entrepreneur Kiran Majumdar Shaw told a Bangalore newspaper, "So far, the terrorists targeted common people. Now the society's elite, the business sector, is the target. What happened in Mumbai is a loud wake-up call for all of us to do something to protect ourselves."

Corporate India did not bat an eyelid when Mumbai train blasts took place, or when Sarojini Nagar was burning on a Diwali day, or Hyderabad was weeping two years before.

But today, every corporate captain is angry, and so are the celebrities who people Page 3 of newspapers, due largely because the attacks on the three top hotels were directly aimed at those who frequent these places, for business or pleasure (contrast this with the scant coverage of the carnage at the Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, for example, where commoners were involved).

All the same, the bleeding-heart liberals would be back to their routine ways after a few days. They will lament that the captured terrorist has not been given his favourite food and not allowed to watch TV or use his cell phone; they will say his human rights are violated. Just wait for the chorus.

Of course, this time it will be between Page 3 and the jholawalas (activists) and that should be an interesting match to watch, but that's another story.

In the last ten years, not a single session of any seminar sponsored by the CII or Ficci or business/general journals has focussed on terrorism. When this writer once broached the importance of talking about it, a senior business captain said it is for the government to deal with.

Many of those seminars gave importance to Musharraf and now Zardari, as if they are going to provide any solution when they are a part of the problem.

Now, at least, terrorism is being realised as a problem facing the country.

Let us summarise what the real situation is and what the corporate sector should do if we are serious in fighting terrorism on our soil.

1. Recognise and treat Pakistan as a terrorist state. The state policy of Pakistan is terrorism and their single-point programme is to destroy India. This needs to be internalised by every business baron including the owners of media.
Imagine the provocation. This is like forcing the Indian media to stop calling Pakistan, Pakistan and instead by some other derogatory term.

2. Now, the elite of Pakistan are more angry, since India is growing at 7% and they are given CCC rating and stiff conditions for borrowing from the IMF.

Many an academic from that country, who I have met in global conferences, has openly lamented that nobody talks about Indo-Pak relations anymore, but only Indo-China or Indo-American, etc. They want to be equal but they are in deep abyss.

Why is this a bad thing? Every nation should have good business leaders who want to reach to the top. The problem I think that this commentator has is at the very notion that to consider a lowly Pakistani with a superior Indian as equals?

3. Pakistan is the only territory in the world where an army has a whole country under its control. This is an important issue since studies have found that a large number of corporates in Pakistan are ultimately owned by the Fauji Foundation (FF), Army Welfare Trust (AWT) Bahria Foundation (BF), Shaheen Foundation (SF) all owned by different wings of armed forces (See paper presented by Dr Ayesha Siddiqa-Agha on 'Power, Perks, Prestige And Privileges: Military's Economic Activities In Pakistan' in The International Conference on Soldiers in Business -- Military as an Economic Actor; Jakarta, October 17-19, 2000).

Bahria is civilian owned and Shaheen is owned by ex-military people. Bahria is doing good, Shaheen Airlines is barely managing to survive. Aysha Siddiqa has been thoroughly discredited.

Hence, do not try to think of Pakistan without its army, irrespective of who rules that country temporarily and nominally. At least 70% of the market capitalisation of the Karachi stock exchange is owned by the army and related groups.
The biggest companies in Pak are PTCL, PSO. And that companies which runs Toyota. Then banks like MCB, Habib, UBL.

4. There are three groups in India, who are obsessed with friendship with Pakistan. One is the oldies born in that part before partition and who are nostalgic about the Lahore havelis, halwas and mujras. The second is the Bollywood and other assorted groups, who look at it as a big market. The Dawood gang has financed enough of these useful idiots. The third is the candle light holding bleeding heart liberals (BHLs) who cannot imagine India doing well without its younger brother taken care of.

All three have been proved wrong hundreds of times, but they are also opinion makers. Shun them, avoid them and ridicule them
Imagine that, any people calling for peace in India would now be ridiculed?

5. We should categorically, unambiguously, unequivocally boycott Pakistan in all aspects for a decade or more. Be it art, music, economy, commerce, or other hand-holding activities. That army-controlled state has to realise that it has done enough damage to global civilisation.
You cannot control artists. Not in todays world.

More than 100 acts/attempts of terror recorded in the world since 9/11 have had their roots in Pakistan. More than 40% of the prisoners in Guantanamo are Pakistanis.
How many of those incidents happened inside Pakistan? Almost 90% of them must've been caught by Pakistanis too.

6. We should recognise that it is our war and nobody in the world is going to wage it on our behalf. What the Americans are thinking, or what the Britishers are going to do, will not help. A determined country should have a sense of dignity and independence to fight its war.
Haha this guy is now shaming the Indians into taking an aggressive approach to Paksitanis

We should stop interviewing leaders from that country who mouth the same inanities that "you have not produced any proof." The Government of India should perhaps create a museum of proof between India Gate and North Block.
Ok so now he wants to silence Pakistanis. What damage could words do?

I am amazed that a country of a billion is required even to furnish proof. If one-sixth of humanity says that the terrorist state of Pakistan is the root cause of global terrorism -- it is factual. Let us not fall into the trap of providing proof to the culprits.
No that is lynch mob justice not courtroom justice of the civilized world!

7. We should realise that a united Pakistan is a grave threat to the existence of India. Hence, we should do everything possible to break up Pakistan into several units. This is required to be done not only for our interest, but for world peace.
Maybe in Pakistan fugitive, wanted, criminals might say this kind of stuff against India. But here we have it, one of the biggest media sources of India is advocating destroying Pakistan! I think this comment needs to be taken very seriously and Indians should be questioned about it.

8. We have made a grave blunder by suggesting in the international fora that "Pakistan is also a victim of terror." That is a grave error and it will haunt us for decades. They are perpetrators and our government is in deep illusion if it tries to distinguish between organs of power in that country thinking it is like India.
So wha tis he trying to say? We have not been victims of terror? We enjoyed being killed?

There is only one organ, namely its army (with ISI as a sub-organ) in that country, which owns and controls at least 70% of the GDP in that country.
Again not true and just mere rambling.

If we want the world to treat Pakistan for what it is, then we should start practising it. Always call it the 'terrorist state of Pakistan' and never have any illusion that it is going to be any different.
Again hes resorting to ridicule and needs to be locked up for hate speech.

If corporate India, including electronic/ print media, starts practising this, we should see results in a few years. Are the elites listening?
So the elites of India have been targeted so this guy gets himself all riled up? What their crap don't stink? Their blood aint red?

Absolute, *****. Never before seen being printed by mainstream media like this.

What is the opinion of our Indian members? Do you guys share these views?
 
.
So the elites of India have been targeted so this guy gets himself all riled up? What their crap don't stink? Their blood aint red?

Absolute, *****. Never before seen being printed by mainstream media like this.

What is the opinion of our Indian members? Do you guys share these views?

Althrough i dont agree with all the opinions of author(depends of how u view pakistan)Its not that elites are anything special.Rich does not care about poor normally. So now that they are direct victims of the problem , he want them to act.
 
.
Asim, we have seen terrorism for the past 50 years. But, inspite of the all the things, today we Indians managed to get to a position that we can be a world power. We have created a precious neach for ourselves around the world. We worked very hard to make Mumbai what it is today.Mumbai, not just some western Indian city with a monument called the 'Gateway Of India'. Mumbai is the gateway to India.And the Taj is no ordinary Hotel, it is a simbol which stands testomony to India's colonial past and a success story.. It is the simbol of India.We were hit by terror many times in the past, each time we got-up, and moved on. But, this time we do-not want to get up and move on, we in general reflection of the sentiment of the people, We all are angry.Irrespective of religion and to region, we all Indians are angry. Hence you see different things written out of anger. But, in general do not mistake it as an anger against the people of Pakistan. There is nothing for us against the common man in Pakistan.
There is no anger against the present elected govt. in Pakistan. It is only aainst a certain segment who claim they are "doing everything in Pakistan's interest."
These are the people who are the real trouble makers and are enemies of both the people of India and the people of Pakistan.
 
. .
Pakistan's stance of non-cooperation in interrogation of terrorists ( IC-814, Banning of Let etc) is causing backlash in India and fanning the belief that state is supporting these elements. No one believes in action taken by Pakistan against the terrorist.
 
.
This article is seems like a peace-proposal compared to the stuff coming out of the Pakistani media.

Lets not mince words - Pakistan has been a state sponsor of terror. There's no polite way to put it.
 
.
.

There was no one stopping you from posting it but it is offtopic here and the question is not that India is a failed state or not its the words used in the articles are very inflammatory and are inciting hatred towards Pakistanis.

Anyway...
 
.
Pakistan's stance of non-cooperation in interrogation of terrorists ( IC-814, Banning of Let etc) is causing backlash in India and fanning the belief that state is supporting these elements. No one believes in action taken by Pakistan against the terrorist.
We have arrested terrorists, we have invited Indians to interrogate them. We are joining Indians in banning them at the UNSC level.

India has not taken any action on the 35 names we mentioned.
 
.
This article is seems like a peace-proposal compared to the stuff coming out of the Pakistani media.

Lets not mince words - Pakistan has been a state sponsor of terror. There's no polite way to put it.
Sponsoring the freedom fight in India is not terrorism.

Our state has done nothing in India or anywhere else.
 
.
We have arrested terrorists, we have invited Indians to interrogate them. We are joining Indians in banning them at the UNSC level.

India has not taken any action on the 35 names we mentioned.

No Pakistan have invited Indians to Investigate with a rider "Joint Investigations". Which India would not agree given the trust in its relations with Pakistan.

Rest does makes no sense that has been done in retaliation of its demands to save GoP face in Public.
 
.
This article is seems like a peace-proposal compared to the stuff coming out of the Pakistani media.

Lets not mince words - Pakistan has been a state sponsor of terror. There's no polite way to put it.

For that matter so has the US and India, been a state sponsor of terrorism that is, by virtue of supporting proxies and other groups involved in destabilization and violence in other nations.

I find it hard to believe you are actually going to try and argue that the Pakistani media has been advocating we invade India, carry out unilateral strikes in it, break it apart or whatever.

No, this time around, the hatred, brainwashing and unadulterated vitriol is all India's.
 
.
No Pakistan have invited Indians to Investigate with a rider "Joint Investigations". Which India would not agree given the trust in its relations with Pakistan.

And why do you expect us to trust you, given India's own past evil deeds against Pakistan?
 
.
No Pakistan have invited Indians to Investigate with a rider "Joint Investigations". Which India would not agree given the trust in its relations with Pakistan.

Rest does makes no sense that has been done in retaliation of its demands to save GoP face in Public.
Look the way we see it we're nicely doing everything by the book. Pakistan has done all good things. Sooner or later you'll see articles popping going like "Wait a min... Isn't India being anal about refusing all these overtures by Pakistan?". At that point all this refusal to cooperate would bite you guys in the rear.
 
.
Look the way we see it we're nicely doing everything by the book. Pakistan has done all good things. Sooner or later you'll see articles popping going like "Wait a min... Isn't India being anal about refusing all these overtures by Pakistan?". At that point all this refusal to cooperate would bite you guys in the rear.

If Pakistan does had something against HuD or Let it would have closed camps
long back, Not waited for response from Mumbai attacks.
Let was banned by Musharaf after Indian parliament attacks and Masood was sent in prison only to be let free soon. Pakistan action does not certificate from India. Why does Pakistan arrest the terrorist without outside pressure ?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom