Thanks for your suggestions...Iran's new indigenous Types are almost complete (some resemblance to Type 022 but much bigger)..Three are being built simultaneously in three shipyards..
New Recruit
Lol....that doesnt change the fact that Persian Gulf will always be the most important and easily accessible waters adjacent to ARab countries. If Persian Gulf security is irrelevant then why is US 5th fleet still there? if there's no use for the persian gulf bcoz kSA can bypass it and its "not expensive", then why protect whats irrelevant? makes no sense.
But what does International law say about what transpired? Look, the correct applicable law isnt relative. US violated international law, that IS THE FACT. end of story.
First of all, law is only meaningful if it can be enforced. Therefore, the so-called international law is often in limbo. The law of each country is almost always enforced by its own law enforcement. But who enforces the international law? If it is not enforced, is it really a law or just a cry of injustice?
Any law or constitution is nothing unless you have men and guns to back it up. That is why it is stupid to claim to have a constitutional state without guaranteeing the right to bear arms. Otherwise how would this constitution be enforced?
There should always be the right for self-defense. However, bearing arms raises many technical questions on details. Is a nuclear bomb an arm? What about a howitzer? Should an armed drone be allowed? I think for practical purpose, there should be a limit on what defines an arm and whatever defines an allowed arm, there should be a law to require people be trained properly to use it, unless it is too trivial, like a stone. I think the training part is often missed in the debate on the right to bear arms.
lack of enforcement doesnt mean that illegal actions becomes/is allowed to be considered legal actions. lets forget all semantics and playing devil's advocate. US committed intl piracy...according to Intl law.
Training is easy. I could teach you to accuratley fire a rifle in 30 minutes to an hour. I think all arms should be allowed that the Military has. Otherwise, the people are put at a disadvantage.
Of course but as a requirement it needs enforcement. Many people just buy a gun and think that is all there is. Properly using a gun and making sure it is secured from misuse should be a responsibility for anyone owning a gun.
First of all, there are only just or unjust actions and they are through moral judgement. To categorize legal and illegal actions, you need law, which doesn't exist if there is no enforcement. Don't confuse unjust actions with illegal actions and just actions with legal actions. Many legal actions are unjust and many illegal actions are just.
No. it has been a tanker with 1.5 million barrel capacity and story starts from months earlier, there has been two receiving tankers. one tanker was seized by Iran shortly, and US navy didn't get the chance to intervene.
