Yes that’s probably too much, if it can’t be done legally, then only abuse of civil liberties and the justice system (the latter is actual high treason) would get you the results in bold. Put it this way, I live in the UK, if tomorrow I were to become a member of parliament, if I said that the country should give Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and Cornwall independence... people would definitely call me a traitor, but nobody would be able to remove me from parliament without electing me out at the next election. I may even be removed from my party, but nobody would stop me spewing seditious statements in parliament, freedom of thought and association is one of the bases of democracy.
So applying this standard to our democracy, if someone says Durand line shouldn’t be accepted, do I agree with them? No, they’re wrong and what they are saying is objectionable. But do I think they should be removed through draconian means, impromised etc? No, as long as they aren’t breaking the law.
Anyway, I have to excuse myself from this discussion for now, will log back in tomorrow.