Jaggu
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2013
- Messages
- 621
- Reaction score
- 1
Should have? they did commit genocide against the Sikhs. The biggest massacres of the Sikhs occurred under Afghan rule. Attacked and destroyed the Darbar Sahib in Amritsar more than once. And the Mughals also had committed genocide against the Sikhs, especially under Zakaria Khan, Adina Beg, Mir Mannu and Lakhpat Rai. That's why Sikhs were fighting in the first place. Before that, the Sikhs were a peaceful community in case you didn't knowSikhs were driven by madness, they were cowardly attacking muslims , killing unarmed men, women and children.....Afghans tried to confront sikhs, but they used to run towards hills before their arrival...so afghans used to destroy their crops and demolish their houses as punishment...afghans should have committed genocide of sikhs. Infact the it was responsibility of mughals of earlier period to get rid of this filth which were neither muslims nor hindus.
Last edited: