Rashid Mahmood
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2013
- Messages
- 3,803
- Reaction score
- 38
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
exactly, like you calling yourself Jinnah's successor does nothing to take away from the fact that you are essentially the next Mir Jaffar.
I said a process, a process, not a name change. People need to abandon the ideology of a Islamic Republic instead be more realistic, the Moulvis will disappear gradually then
you cannot engineer the nation the way Attaturk did some 90 years ago.
People used to say men can never fly. It would be a gradual process. Why can't we repeat the feats of Attaturk? I have faith in the new generation.you cannot engineer the nation the way Attaturk did some 90 years ago.
I can do that !
Are you with me young man ?
Sure, people also did not have the information highway with them...massive means of disseminating information and disinformation which also ends up leaving people in a cocoon. The young generation you have the faith in is going to be slaughtered before your very eyes in their idea of support because they cannot fight the fanaticism that breeds next door to them.People used to say men can never fly. It would be a gradual process. Why can't we repeat the feats of Attaturk? I have faith in the new generation.
the mantra is Gradual process. repeating the feat of Ataturk is not possible in current scenario.Just some biased brainwashing material.
People used to say men can never fly. It would be a gradual process. Why can't we repeat the feats of Attaturk? I have faith in the new generation.
Damn you Oscar !
@Rashid Mahmood Bhai deeekh raheiiii hain isss Karachiite ko.....he just called me Mir Jaffar !
PLease explain how?the mantra is Gradual process. repeating the feat of Ataturk is not possible in current scenario.
You can do that? You didn't even understood the point of an online thread.I can do that !
Are you with me young man ?
You can do that? You didn't even understood the point of an online thread.
Sure, as long as it provides for me. You are mistaking the inability of the state to act out its functions due to a malignant population as problems relating to the state laws itself(not that many are not discriminatory.. but not all are either).
Rebranding, removing Islamic.. these are all wishful thoughts.. the recent attack on the civil society protest should be ample proof that the issue with bigotry has much less to do with the state than with the society itself. The state can be called the glorious Islamic galactic empire of Lalapalooza and it still will not have that effect on the people that is being supposed.
The character of the state, constitution and institutions all need change.. that is a given.. but to expect rather naively just like the Government of Pakistan says that the problem will solve within 2 years is folly. The sort of mess Pakistan is in requires invasive surgery.. or a self implosion.. a civil war to say at the least... something that is already in progress.. it just hasnt expanded to the level for people to start calling it that.
Don't worry bro, everyone knows who is the real mir jaffar and who is a patriot....
Just stay focused.....
But I am little surprised, that why I am not seeing wide spread protests in Pakistan against extremism? Can you throw some light. We have seen very severe attacks on Pakistan, but why is the civil society not erupting in portests?? I find the response of Pak civil society very disproportionate compared to the mayhem created by extremists.
Your argument has so many loopholes which can be pointed out right away.
Qatar has about 13% of known global reserve of petroleum. As we know, petroleum is the chief driving factor of global economy in our times. With that amount of resources, it would rather surprising not to see a country prosper. However, did you know that Qatar has been ranked as one of the worst places for workers by International Trade Union Confederation ?
Saudi Arabia is also the same story.
These are not good economic models, as their economy is based on a singular precious raw material which is in high demand. The economy is based on wastage. A good model will promote re-use, will open up other facets of development and reduce reliance on a single source. You want an example ? Look at China or US. If land area is a matter of concern, then take a look at Japan.
Israel has a high number of PhDs. Now does that have anything to do with religion ? They don't get their PhDs by reading the religious scriptures. Look at the other instances, Canada or Japan. None of them can be termed as overtly religious.
Your most ridiculous example was that of USSR. Did USSR collapse because it was a secular state ? Taking it other way around,according to you, having a single religion will give rise to unity as a state, right ? Then answer me this, why there are so many Arab countries ?Islam was founded there, they have the religion in common, and they even have language in common, which is a far greater binding factor than religion, in my opinion. So, why so many Arab countries ?
Getting back to USSR ? Do you understand what Perestroika and Glasnost is ?
You are drawing wrong inferences all along which are totally out of context.
If one needs to look what real development is, then take a look at how the Western European countries did it or how Japan did it. France, Germany, UK, Poland, all of them were totally devastated after the Second World War, their economies ruined. In economics lessons you will find examples of inflation in Germany after First World war and Second World war. But all of them emerged out of that crisis and created a process for holistic development. This development is not based on a single natural resource that one country has in abundance and the other has none.
I don't generalize whole races of people, I don't glorify cold blooded murderers like Mumtaz Qadri, I am not against any kind education, I don't hero-worship anyone who wears a beard and keeps women veiled, I think women are equal to men, I don't watch bestiality **** on internet (because they think it is better than watching *HARAM* WOMEN *HARAM*), I don't create my own theories on Jihadist groups, I don't blame much better-off westerns thousands of miles away, I don't violently watchdog my beliefs, among many things. Me and my ideology can have its flaws, but I think my ideology may be better because it agrees with the doctrine of Universal Human Rights accepted by the entire world. I didn't called any specific people silly, stupid, regressive. I merely stated the evidenced facts (and the facts point them out to be stupid and hypocritical perverts), something that millions of know-it-all conspiracy theorists around Pakistan fail to even understand. I am speaking from experience. If you are settled in Australia, I don't think you can understand.