The_Showstopper
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,708
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Ok please go through the OP and my post again, where did I or AK for that matter state that providing subsidies is AAP's intent. Check out his election speeches, he promised for cheap electricity/water etc and not subsidies. Providing subsidies as repeated by AAP is a temporary solution and providing cheap power through alternate cheap sources is AAP's intent and this is what one one of the link I posted previously speaks of.Check when you started the thread..what news you posted(which talks about only subsidy)then check your Post# 30 where you attributed this actions as walking the talk and then read my pos t# 48....Now please tell me who is repeating what!!
Just to be on same page...giving subsidy is not walking the talk..concrete actions on reducing power tarrifs by respecting economic prudence is....please state your point and let's move on this one for good
Ok I ask the previously asked questions again which are still unanswered....I didn't ignore anything...that's why called them lame...Please even a kindergarden kid will crack this that if 90% of the population is covered under this subsidy then all the points about usage by poor, middle and rich goes for a toss...In short 90% of the population in delhi consume less that 400 units and will be subsidized...now unless and until you are saying that 90% of Delhi population is poor and deserves subsidy then can we atleast conclude that this scheme covers a good amount of non deserving people(from subsidy perspective) and thus unfortunate....can you be this honest with me??
Do you think the free water and cheap electricity is unlimited? Would a rich or upper middle class family use the same amount of water or electricity as compared to a poor or lower middle class family?
You are not getting the point here. Remote villages never got the mileage neither now nor then. But other urban areas like Mumbai, Bangalore, Kolkata etc regularly get their share prime time slot but Delhi easily beats them in this game. So my point is Delhi is more famous or rather put it as infamous than other urban centres for obvious reasons which can easily be implied to BJP and its cohorts when compared to.other parties.Comon buddy...you are repeating my point and kind of agreeing to it..not sure if you have realized this...Media shows those stories which have maximum mileage....showing a rape in delhi has much more mileage than a remote village...similarly highlighting Hindu orthodox moronic actions has much more mileage while BJP in power than otherwise...Just one off topic point....the % of rapes reported in Delhi vs Actuals is much better than remote areas...however that doesn't make delhi any safe place...just an observation that i want to share...
I just gave you an instance of forced conversion. Why cherry pick that particular instance? RSS and certain BJP members have repeatedly voiced their support for "Ghar Wapsis". Is Modi alien to BJP/RSS or are you alien to this news?I already said i want them out.....however are you willing to say that this so called forced conversion allegation has nothing to with Modi or his MP's....given you agree law and order is a state subject??
If someone out of free will is doing something, how is that defined as "taking advantage". If you can't differentiate between free will and taking advantage, well I don't have much to say....Taking advantage of someone's poverty is not free will...if you can't even differentiate that then i agree we should stop right here....
Can you elaborate the bolded part since you chose to support that party and still can't reason this? And speaking of AAP, if the present situation of AAP is what you call gutter, I would definitely want to know how you would describe BJP/Congress...When i clearly said i want them to be out why you wrote that?? I said politics is weird because i can't make much sense why these people are still in...similarly AAP has disappointed on many terms where they failed to live upto the high moral ground they were championing...Last one month has shown us a lot of muck...so going down the gutter is in this sense...they have won 67 seats, going to stay for 5 years and are hopefully going to do good work...
Keeping a territory of India and its residents happy and peaceful also counts as national interests. Not sure what you meant by your version of national interests...National interests are supreme and disintegration of country is last thing we should support in the name of democracy...now this is my last comment on this topic, feel free to reply if you still want to...
I don't remember people asking Modi to speak out on his party issues when he was on foreign visits, so why do you want AK to speak on party issues when he is not in Delhi....Sweet ... the whole saga happened for over a month....he was outside delhi for how long?? Anyhow i have no problems with him speaking or not because i believe it is not necessary for Arvind to speak every time and on every issue...There are ministers and other supporting staff for the same reason..They are his voice...This is true for Modi as well...his senior most ministers spoke on this....they had debates in Parliament....he himself spoke in Parliament...now if we want to ignore all that then no-one can help here...
I already made it clear that I dislike Modi and I have obvious reasons for it and have listed them before and yes I supported them with credible sources, so you are just repeating this part....Agreed...yes they are distasteful and i apologize....however one request...if you are blind AAP supporter or/and strong Modi hater then please call it out...otherwise some of your reply make me wonder why is this simple thing not getting across and i tend to loose control(not an excuse and i will mind my words from now on!!)