What's new

A united front

batmannow

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Messages
18,830
Reaction score
-19
Country
United States
Location
Thailand
A united front

Dawn Editorial
Wednesday, 20 May, 2009


THE all-parties conference was meant to sound out the political spectrum on the necessity of the battle underway in Malakand division, but, in truth, all eyes were on one man and his party: Nawaz Sharif and the PML-N. With the PPP, MQM and ANP fully behind the military operation and even the PML-Q appearing supportive in public, the only real question was whether the PML-N would join in accepting the necessity of the operation. And to Mr Sharif’s credit he has done just that, accepting that the state was left with no choice but to fight after the militants in Malakand division had effectively closed the door on the policy of dialogue. So, with the overwhelming majority of parliament now behind the government’s policy, the Pakistan Army now has a clear mandate to fight and defeat the militants. Pakistan, it seems, may have finally turned the page on the militancy issue and at long last may have begun to present a unified national front against the militants. If that is indeed the case, then it has been achieved not a moment too soon given the alarming rise of militancy in recent years.


The PML-N’s support for a national policy against militancy is important for two reasons. First, militancy will not be defeated today, tomorrow or even a year from now. A tough, drawn-out fight should be expected, and it will involve many different areas of Pakistan. Second, the PML-N is the only real political rival to the PPP, with all other parties ranking a distant third among the electorate. Given Pakistan’s unstable political culture and unpredictability of events here, a situation in which both the two major parties in the country accept and understand the need for the military option in certain circumstances bodes well for Pakistan’s fight against terrorism, extremism and militancy.:tup:



The emphatic verdict of the APC — the resolution issued afterwards was airy and soft, but in Pakistan the wording of such resolutions is rarely of major importance — may also have a positive effect on the thinking of the Pakistan Army. Until now, the army has appeared reluctant to take on the militants on multiple fronts simultaneously, perhaps because it has been worried about the lack of popular support for such large-scale operations on Pakistani territory. But now the army may be encouraged to go beyond firefighting and think bigger — there is little doubt that at some point the focus must turn to the Waziristan agencies in Fata, where the threat that lurks may be larger than that in Swat by an order of magnitude. Be that as it may, the military option must always be weighed carefully. Fighting is serious business with serious consequences for the population, the army and the government — it should only be resorted to with a clearly defined objective and well-thought-out strategy in place.:tup::pakistan:
 
.
The Army has looked reluctant that may have more to do with the policy in those days rather than the situation at present I think the whole peace deal thing has taught everyone an important lesson.
 
.
The Army has looked reluctant that may have more to do with the policy in those days rather than the situation at present I think the whole peace deal thing has taught everyone an important lesson.

i think army will always be reluctant if ppl are not backing its actions
 
. .
the quicker the operation ends the more support the army will enjoy.....however,if this operation drags on for god forbid 6 months to a year then ARMY will lose support....
 
.
the quicker the operation ends the more support the army will enjoy.....however,if this operation drags on for god forbid 6 months to a year then ARMY will lose support....

However much I hope that is the case I feel that this won't happen it willl have to be long loyalties will be tested and mindsets will change just like they did against MQM the next generation think they always no better.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom