Imran Khan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 68,815
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
ohhh teri to saaly ye mujhy jeeny nhi deen gay . i surrenderF-22s are coming to BD!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ohhh teri to saaly ye mujhy jeeny nhi deen gay . i surrenderF-22s are coming to BD!
pretty sure this was debunked... all of them were overhauled...Four of them were overhauled in Ukraine back in 2012. BAF is in a dilemma on whether it is worth spending any more money on upgrades considering the life left.
Maintenance has been a struggle for them. You never see more than 4 flying together since re-commission in 2007.
I think you are mixing up debunking of @asad71's claim of only two units being operational with what I am saying.pretty sure this was debunked... all of them were overhauled...
eh no... there is a dude on facebook who has made exhaustive documentation of the crrent status of each airframes... the tender you believe is for overhaul is actually for the entire fleet... (well 6 of them, minus the two seaters) which includes spine extension... AESA radars, glass cockpit etc... but as you know that tender has been pulled... on average each of BAF's mig 29s have around 850 flying hours on clockI think you are mixing up debunking of @asad71's claim of only two units being operational with what I am saying.
I am not claiming any of the 8 are non-operational but they do have significant down time.
4 units underwent major overhaul in Ukraine in 2012. No further major upgrades have been performed since due to BAF's indecision.
BAF had called a tender for overhauling the other four last year but ended up not proceeding. They have taken the tender invites down but here's a post from @The Ronin capturing it:
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/bangladesh-air-force.168817/page-329#post-10681043
Now the bit below is my speculation: The ones that were overhauled in Ukraine probably do the bulk of the flying, for logical reasons. You can see in the photo below that 4 of them have inflicted significantly more grass burns than the others.View attachment 565460
.
eh no... there is a dude on facebook who has made exhaustive documentation of the crrent status of each airframes... the tender you believe is for overhaul is actually for the entire fleet... (well 6 of them, minus the two seaters) which includes spine extension... AESA radars, glass cockpit etc... but as you know that tender has been pulled... on average each of BAF's mig 29s have around 850 flying hours on clock
without life extensions they'll last 2200 flight hours 400 more can be achieved with third overhaul... but upgrade options include options to increase lifespan to 4000 flying hours
There were two sets of tenders called in 2018.eh no... there is a dude on facebook who has made exhaustive documentation of the crrent status of each airframes... the tender you believe is for overhaul is actually for the entire fleet... (well 6 of them, minus the two seaters) which includes spine extension... AESA radars, glass cockpit etc... but as you know that tender has been pulled... on average each of BAF's mig 29s have around 850 flying hours on clock
without life extensions they'll last 2200 flight hours 400 more can be achieved with third overhaul... but upgrade options include options to increase lifespan to 4000 flying hours
850 hours only on clock?!
The pilots will not be combat ready in this case as it takes 150-200 hours of training each year to give pilots world-class training.
My already low-level of respect of BAF has gone down even further, not that it can go down much more.
There were two sets of tenders called in 2018.
The tender you are referring to was called after taking down the tender for overhaul of 4 units. I can clearly remember the first tender mentioning r units.
None of them went through.
Can you link the FB posts you are referring to?
I am not sure about @Michael Corleone's numbers but the flying hours on actual fighters logged by BAF pilots on average is indeed very shitty.
You often see senior pilots flying Yak-130s for the sake of ensuring they keep logging hours.
I think you are mixing up debunking of @asad71's claim of only two units being operational with what I am saying.
I am not claiming any of the 8 are non-operational but they do have significant down time.
4 units underwent major overhaul in Ukraine in 2012. No further major upgrades have been performed since due to BAF's indecision.
BAF had called a tender for overhauling the other four last year but ended up not proceeding. They have taken the tender invites down but here's a post from @The Ronin capturing it:
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/bangladesh-air-force.168817/page-329#post-10681043
Now the bit below is my speculation: The ones that were overhauled in Ukraine probably do the bulk of the flying, for logical reasons. You can see in the photo below that 4 of them have inflicted significantly more grass burns than the others.View attachment 565460
.
This paints a terrible picture for BAF.
It’s irrelevant what type is chosen for the new fighter if the organization is in this sort of state.
Oddest looking situation I have seen in years. F-7BG's rotting under open sky while micro-buses have tin shed luxury.
I can bet each senior AF administrator's bank account has millions of dollars but they can't be bothered to at least manicure the grounds with a few cheap garden implements like Hedge-trimmers or Mowers. Even Indians get their gardeners out with cheap manual garden tools to maintain the grounds...
Hai-Rey Bangladesh!!
Decades of foreign exposure for this BAF d*mb-f*cks has not brought any realization. Entire BAF seems to be run by semi-educated A$$holes! Low-lifes will always be low-lifes comfortable living in garbage environment.
I am totally ashamed and have lost hope for these incompetent BAF nincompoops winning any war against anyone if their facilities are in such shambles. Any Govt., AF facility in SE Asia or Middle East has better maintained grounds for their jets (Forget USAF or NASA).
Excuse my rant but incompetence like this is indicative of how f*cked up the actual organization is.
these are average figures for the 6 single seaters... while the twin seater is in its 1000s but i can't give you the exact number....850 hours only on clock?!
The pilots will not be combat ready in this case as it takes 150-200 hours of training each year to give pilots world-class training.
My already low-level of respect of BAF has gone down even further, not that it can go down much more.
do you know Sibghat sheikh... that lad had done an excellent compilation a year back. you can contact him for the detailsThere were two sets of tenders called in 2018.
The tender you are referring to was called after taking down the tender for overhaul of 4 units. I can clearly remember the first tender mentioning 4 units.
None of them went through.
Can you link the FB posts you are referring to?
I am not sure about @Michael Corleone's numbers but the flying hours on logged on actual fighters by BAF pilots on average are indeed paltry..
You often see senior pilots flying Yak-130s just for the sake of keeping hours logged.
i don't recall that but if what you're saying is accurate then what else can we say about incompetent fuckwids?There were two sets of tenders called in 2018.
The tender you are referring to was called after taking down the tender for overhaul of 4 units. I can clearly remember the first tender mentioning 4 units.
None of them went through.
Can you link the FB posts you are referring to?
Why such an apparent discrepancy between the BN and BAF in terms of competence?
There was never any plan to raise 10 squadrons. Another piece of hoax propagated from the usual source.
In 2013, AM Ziaur Rahman revealed BAF's "aspiration (not even goal)" is to have six fighter squadrons in service in total (old+new) by 2030.
The way BAF function, have they ever looked serious enough to work towards procuring 10 fighter squadrons?
That immature internet clown has too big of an ego to admit reality.
I do not know who you are referring to but BAF published forces goal 2030 explicitly mentions the goal of 10 operational squadrons. Link is somewhere within this thread.
I would agree BAF inaction suggests it was not worth the paper it was written on.
That include trainee aircraft as well. I think we have 4sqdn trainee
Show me an official release which mentions 10 fighter squadrons.
Forces Goal 2030 is BAF official publication. As i said link to it is somewhere in this tread. Go find it yourself if you are interested.
There is no publication mentioning 10 fighter squadrons. Don't mislead people with BS.
I am not misleading anyone..... its here because thats where i read it...others have also read it.....i did not post it.....if you can not be bothered looking for it that really is not my problem.
I have been paying close attention to defence-related news and developments over the last couple of decades, both through research and personal contacts. If BAF ever made such a tall claim, trust me I would know!
I know very well who first propagated this BS ten fighter squadron hoax on the Bangladeshi internet. Some members in this forum simply keeps regurgitating the rumour hoping it becomes true.
The interview with AM Rahman was held in 2013 in which he revealed the six fighter squadron "aspiration". Tried retrieving the article but could not. Will post if I can find it.
BTW, Forces Goal 2030 is not a "publication". It is a vague, open-ended aim of the forces to modernise by 2030. Due to constraints of funds and choice of manufacturers, the goal is constantly evolving with time for BA and BN while BAF twiddle their thumbs.
I will be very happy if we can have 10 squadron of plane, but I see no progress atm. So maybe it's hoax you are right.