sparklingway
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 12, 2009
- Messages
- 3,878
- Reaction score
- 0
Yeah?i always thought it was a 100% neutral paper whose founder was Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah?
Dawn is a much more objective paper. Objectivity and neutrality are different. Jang Group (The News) is much more tabloid like in its investigative reports. Dawn obviously spends more time counter checking its claims and sources before coming out with a damning report. It's reports on social issues are always deep and thought provoking; The News in comparison never deals with social issues and follows the populist views of bashing politicians only and never cares for economic and social issues.
Nonetheless, Dawn obviously caters to a much more upwardly mobile class. As it almost neglects populist viewpoints, it seems like an "elitist" paper, the paper for the morning-tea-sipping-what-will-happen-to-this-country-I'm-going-to-the-financial-security-firm-now kind of people. And it also resonates the establishment's views on many many occasions. Talk to their journalists and opinion writers and they'll tell you that although Dawn does not censor their speech, it rejects pieces entirely that do not follow editorial policy on issues.
And what did Jinnah have to do with Dawn here? Trying to seal an argument with Jinnah's name is a stupid thing to do.