A question about Barak 8

[raj76]

That is the question doofus, how the hell is India supposed to defend against LACM when it does not have a proper air defense system in place.



Do you know what a terrain hugging cruise missile is and the fundamental difference between cruise missile and aircraft?



Ground based radars cannot sweep the earth, aircraft and missiles can fly below the minimum altitude of ground based radars, only AWACs are immune from that tactic. Aircrat require maintenance and repair after every flight so no, all 3 AWACs cannot be airborne at the same time. And even AWACs have their limitations.



Provide sources.



Yes you hindus made for some good slaves, pity you forget your place today.



Watch your mouth.



Don't blabber here like an ignorant fool.



Take your imagination someplace else.

dont get mad now that we all know that u r a

 

[satishkumarcsc]

That is the question doofus, how the hell is India supposed to defend against LACM when it does not have a proper air defense system in place.

The topic was about Barak 8 I guess. Not Indian Air defence of the mainland.

 

[Indian Patriot]

dont get mad now that we all know that u r a

Maybe that's what your father calls you, don't expose your cheap background in a public forum. Maintain decorum or get lost from here.

The topic was about Barak 8 I guess. Not Indian Air defence of the mainland.

The question was about ability to shoot down terrain hugging cruise missiles.

Next time you make an idiot out of yourself read before you comment.

 

[satishkumarcsc]

Maybe that's what your father calls you, don't expose your cheap background in a public forum. Maintain decorum or get lost from here.



The question was about ability to shoot down terrain hugging cruise missiles.

Next time you make an idiot out of yourself read before you comment.

So i think your signature suits you perfectly.

 

[sankranti]

Do you know what a terrain hugging cruise missile is and the fundamental difference between cruise missile and aircraft?

Ground based radars cannot sweep the earth, aircraft and missiles can fly below the minimum altitude of ground based radars, only AWACs are immune from that tactic. Aircrat require maintenance and repair after every flight so no, all 3 AWACs cannot be airborne at the same time. And even AWACs have their limitations.

Provide sources.

Yes you hindus made for some good slaves, pity you forget your place today.
Watch your mouth.

Don't blabber here like an ignorant fool.

Take your imagination someplace else.

LOL..... your entire reply is Gibberish.

Terrain hugging does not mean they fly at 30 meters ..... it means they fly as per nape of the earth. Whatever be the height of flight they hug the terrain as per the curvature of the earth.

No limitation of AWACS or AEW&CS or Aerostat can make a cruise missile invisible. Especially in a pancake flat terrain like pakistan.

Here is your proof.

Akash Missile System ,Medium Range Surface to Air Missile,IGMDP,India - AerMech.IN

".......It can intercept form a range of 30km and provide air defence missile coverage of 2000 sq. km."


Now that EVERYTHING you said has been proven wrong. Don't quote me again.

 

[Indian Patriot]

So i think your signature suits you perfectly.

If you don't know something about a subject do a research rather than show the world how stupid you are, now get lost from here.

BTW the signature was for trolls like you.

LOL..... your entire reply is Gibberish.

Look who is talking.

Terrain hugging does not mean they fly at 30 meters ..... it means they fly as per nape of the earth. Whatever be the height of flight they hug the terrain as per the curvature of the earth.

How hard did you hit your head before posting this gibberish?

No limitation of AWACS or AEW&CS or Aerostat can make a cruise missile invisible. Especially in a pancake flat terrain like pakistan.

Never heard of Himalayas and Kashmir?

Go and play gilli danda, retards like you are unfit for PDF.

 

[sankranti]

Never heard of Himalayas and Kashmir?

Go and play gilli danda, retards like you are unfit for PDF.

LOL.... you think their cruise missile will hug the terrain and fly at 100 meters in the Himalayas or kashmir ?

That is one sure way to crash in pakistan itself

 

[Indian Patriot]

LOL.... you think their cruise missile will hug the terrain and fly at 100 meters in the Himalayas or kashmir ?

That is one sure way to crash in pakistan itself

If you don't know about a subject then don't comment.

 

[satishkumarcsc]

If you don't know something about a subject do a research rather than show the world how stupid you are, now get lost from here.

BTW the signature was for trolls like you.



.

But it suits you perfectly. As you dont know the difference between an antiship cruise missile, anti air missile and anti ballistic missile. You have made a perfect food of yourself when you brought in Babur and Ra'ad into discussion as both are not anti ship cruise misslies but land attack cruise missile.

The Radar ranges differs for different targets and nape of the earth is not 10 metres for a Land attack cruise missile. If it flew at that height then the space for maneuvering is decreased and if the missile hits any air turbulence it crashes into the ground.

The ground clutter is a very vialble thing you spoke about. And Indian air defence is multilayered, For this reason SHORAD and VSHORAD are deployed like the Tunguska systems. The range is not the problem but the probablity of kill is.

 

[sankranti]

If you don't know about a subject then don't comment.

A worthy advice for you to follow and not make a fool of yourself. Though I admit, it may be too late for that.

 

[Indian Patriot]

But it suits you perfectly

No, it suits trolls like you perfectly.

As you dont know the difference between an antiship cruise missile, anti air missile and anti ballistic missile. You have made a perfect food of yourself when you brought in Babur and Ra'ad into discussion as both are not anti ship cruise misslies but land attack cruise missile.

You don't know whether it was an anti-ship or a land attack cruise missile which was discussed. But like the blockhead loser you are you barged in with your stupid opinion which holds no value.

The discussion here was about Indian defense against Pakistani cruise missiles you duffer. Why are you so hell bent on embarrassing yourself further? Your pathetic grammar shows your level of stupidity.

The Radar ranges differs for different targets and nape of the earth is not 10 metres for a Land attack cruise missile. If it flew at that height then the space for maneuvering is decreased and if the missile hits any air turbulence it crashes into the ground.

The ground clutter is a very vialble thing you spoke about. And Indian air defence is multilayered, For this reason SHORAD and VSHORAD are deployed like the Tunguska systems. The range is not the problem but the probablity of kill is.

I have been handling trolls like you whose knowledge on military matters is virtually non-existent. So instead of wasting bandwith why don't you just get lost and let more knowledgeable guys take part in the discussion?

A worthy advice for you to follow and not make a fool of yourself. Though I admit, it may be too late for that.

This coming from a retard like you? Other than modi modi what do you idiots know?

 

[sankranti]

This coming from a retard like you? Other than modi modi what do you idiots know?

You mean apart from geometry, geography radar operations, Akash specifications, India's defence preparedness and cruise missile operations facts ? I am guessing a lot more than a madrassa graduate who's knowledge is limited to the quran.

 

[Kinetic]

OMG, we're shivering right now.

Now think of your pilots, what happening to them. Not only this, SPYDER, Akash and S-400 are also there.

 

[knight11]

But it suits you perfectly. As you dont know the difference between an antiship cruise missile, anti air missile and anti ballistic missile. You have made a perfect food of yourself when you brought in Babur and Ra'ad into discussion as both are not anti ship cruise misslies but land attack cruise missile.

The Radar ranges differs for different targets and nape of the earth is not 10 metres for a Land attack cruise missile. If it flew at that height then the space for maneuvering is decreased and if the missile hits any air turbulence it crashes into the ground.

The ground clutter is a very vialble thing you spoke about. And Indian air defence is multilayered, For this reason SHORAD and VSHORAD are deployed like the Tunguska systems. The range is not the problem but the probablity of kill is.

@sankranti
Have you read my Signature.

 

[I S I]

Now think of your pilots, what happening to them. Not only this, SPYDER, Akash and S-400 are also there.

I just heard the news now that all PAF pilots resigned in fear after reading your comment. Now you can invade Pak land.