A One-Party State is the Best System to Beat a Pandemic

[beijingwalker]

A One-Party State is the Best System to Beat a Pandemic

 

[atan651]

Damn the personal freedom of speech and expression. When it comes to PUBLIC health issues such as this, one-party system is the only way to go to get the problem(s) under effective control.

 

[Chhatrapati]

Yeah, but we don't live from Pandemic to Pandemic. We live in normal circumstances where countries don't hide information and let deadly viruses spread throughout the world.

 

[beijingwalker]

Yeah, but we don't live from Pandemic to Pandemic. We live in normal circumstances where countries don't hide information and let deadly viruses spread throughout the world.

Do you mean Italy or Spain? maybe India? India says its virus was from Europe and middle east, US says its from Europe, Australia says its from US.

 

[Menthol]

It's not one-party state that is the best.

Instead, people's ability to organize (like making a plan, unity, follow order, and discipline) makes it successful.

Although One-party system contributes a lot because it's a lot easier to organize, to be united, and have a single bold plan.

Rather than too many contradictory opinions in democratic countries, in the end, there's a lot of confusion in society and making excuses to avoid being self-disciplined.

In a well organized democratic country, it's fine as well.


But from this case, it can also represent the economic development of a country.

In a country that is more organized (with all the good traits above), is easier to be successful in a much faster way than who is not.

 

[vi-va]

Completely misleading analysis from western lens.
China is not one party or multi-party.
CCP is not western party at all.
If you use western political terms to analyze China, it definitely will go wrong.

Multi party system is dead, at least dead for developing countries.
Not a single country got developed in past 70 years under multi party system.

 

[CatSultan]

Or a monarch