What's new

A message from People of Indian Occupied Kashmir to Pakistan

. . . .
Land belongs to the people, not foreigners who have nothing to do with the land or it's people.

History has proven itself over and over, that you can never occupy a region that's hellbent on secession.


Not in the context of Kashmir but just to correct your point above....

Australia belonged to Aboriginals, NZ belongs to Maoris..even US belonged to Red Indians...foreigners came , occupied and still holding the land. All of these native people fought bitterly...but in the end.."Might is right".
This is the true history.
Our ancestors (Muslims) occupied many lands...Egypt, Persia,Mesopotamia and lot more...as foreigners...did all kind of atrocities on local population, did conversions and as a result they are still holding it ....
As India will get mightier...more difficult it will keep getting to get Kashmir....as India will have less opposition to it's suppression activities there....In my opinion....Whole Kashmir will neither go to India nor Pakistan....nor it will be independent.... World powers will not let this region to cool off so easily...there is lot at stake....
 
.
you answered your own question....i dont even need to tell you who is a foreigner in Indian subcontinent, muslims demanded a separate state, they were given pakistan.
if anybody wants to live in a muslim country pakistan should take them in, but as far as India is concerned we are not giving you anything with Kashmiris, well we can pay loads of money if you want...
given by who lol muslim cudnt live with hindus and your mody prove it :) aab yeh bata jaga tum nay kia kerni hai jab jal ker rakh ban ker hawa mein tahleel hi hona hai to jaga bhi hamari or loog bhi. aab or ziyada army baigho kashmir india ki patlon mein kanta hai to chubhta rahay ga :)
 
. .
Bro tell me is there any value for only those people? What you actually want is the land and its resources right? That the honest truth for either side.
India/Pak have spent way more fighting over Kashmir(in defense expenditures and wars) than they will ever get from Kashmir's land/resources/manpower. What Pakistanis desire is let the Kashmiris decide their future...aka holding a plebiscite. Now I know u r gonna come back with the whole argument that "Pak needs to vacate so that India can hold that plebiscite". That argument is a non-starter since both nations distrust each other completely. The ideal solution would be that a plebiscite is held by a third party like under the supervision of UN. Both India/Pak troops vacate and allow UN peacekeepers(not comprising of troops from India/Pak) move in to maintain order and ensure fairness during the voting. Then as per the results the region will go to either India or Pak...or third option would be freedom(at least I think it should be). If the results differ in different regions(like for example Jammu chooses India and Kashmir chooses Pak)...then it can be divided accordingly. In any case the goal should be to allow Kashmiris to choose their fate so they r happy and ending the hostilities between India/Pak.
 
. .
We ( Pakistan Side ) not serious on Kashmir issued if Mulla like Deisel Head of Kashmir committee chances are 0x〇=Zero, the blood of inocients just wasting for nothing.
 
.
Hmm so you mean that people are entitled to claim the land where whey have lived for centuries right ?
My statement is self explanatory , stop using india logic to get self serving inference out of it.
 
. .
Doodh mango ga kheer dain ga
Kashmir mango ga CHEER dain ga
:pakistan:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom