DALAI LAMA 4477
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2011
- Messages
- 85
- Reaction score
- 0
but u have said the word SKEPTICISM & also ur previous posts contadicts it .Yes, I said that before. You CAN have a 100km or even 1000km distance capable missile airframe
well the same seeker thing i had also said above that a IR seeker is more important than it's long range of missile .Well the question i want to ask u whther it is good or effective for IR guided missile to have such a long range as generraly we have ir guided missiles approximate range of 20-30 km ? does it is advantage or disadvantage in terms of IR guided misile kill rate .wont the plane be able to counter IR guided missile as such long range .Or i may ask u why dont we have long range IR guided BVR missiles like EM guided missiles .PLZ tellbut it does you no good to advertise that capability if your sensor/guidance package is limited to 10km. In fact, if you do advertise so, you would not be in business for long. The moment you install a sensor/guidance package into a missile, the effective range burden (or limit) is shifted to the sensor/guidance package. This is not a physical limitation but a virtual one. If you decided to guide the missile via the launch parent aircraft's sensor package, then that is a different story. You can legitimately advertise that ADDITIONAL capability to increase the missile's range, but if asked, you must also give the lower range estimate because that is based upon the assumption that not everyone will be able to guide the missile via the aircraft's sensor package.
REGARDS