What's new

A homecoming gone so horribly wrong

Flintlock

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
6,176
Reaction score
0
A homecoming gone so horribly wrong

The seemingly unending nightmare of political and extremist violence continues in Pakistan, as is clear from the country’s worst-ever terrorist attacks on Thursday. The brace of bomb blasts that tore through crowds surrounding former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto’s convoy in Karachi reportedly killed over 150 people at last count and injured hundreds. From all accounts, suicide bombers who mingled with the crowds carried out the attacks as some 150,000 people packed the streets of the port city to greet Ms Bhutto, who was returning home after eight years in self-imposed exile. The bombings hit as her convoy moved slowly through the throng towards the mausoleum of Pakistan’s founding father, Mohammed Ali Jinnah, where she was to deliver a triumphal address to the people.

The attacks were not unexpected in Karachi, which is a hotbed of sectarian killings. Intelligence reports even warned that various jehadi groups linked to al-Qaeda and the Taliban were planning to carry out such strikes on Ms Bhutto on her return. The fact that the former premier announced the date and place of her return weeks ago probably gave the perpetrators enough time to prepare. Although no one has yet claimed responsibility for the attacks, many elements in Pakistan are opposed to Ms Bhutto’s possible return to power. She is widely seen as a pro-Western moderate and her open statements supporting US policy in the region obviously put her in the cross-hairs of terrorist outfits. She returns to the political scene at a time when Pervez Musharraf’s grip on the presidency is at its weakest since he seized power in a coup eight years ago. The General’s popularity ratings continue to nosedive even as Opposition parties challenged his re-election as president earlier this month. The loyalty of Pakistan’s powerful military and US patronage appear to be just about the only things going for the embattled president. The Bush administration evidently prompted him and Ms Bhutto to work out a deal that would allow the latter to return home without facing corruption charges so that the duo could be used to fight against the Taliban and al-Qaeda militants sheltering in Pakistan’s tribal areas along the Afghan border.

Ironically, the very forces that the general and Ms Bhutto had created now pose the biggest threat to them.
For it was during Ms Bhutto’s second term in office in 1994, when General Musharraf was her Director General of Military Operations, that they projected the Taliban as a force to further Pakistani interests in Afghanistan. But now, any military solution they try out against the radicals would likely trigger more turbulence and invite attacks on the Pakistan army. As Pakistan drifts, the problem for India is that Islamabad’s military rulers might try to divert attention by indulging in military adventurism. Which means a real danger of increased militancy in Kashmir, more active insurgencies in the North-east and terrorist strikes in the subcontinent.
HindustanTimes-Print
© Copyright 2007 Hindustan Times
 
She returns to the political scene at a time when Pervez Musharraf’s grip on the presidency is at its weakest since he seized power in a coup eight years ago.


Errrm, no. He still has control over the army. He could do away with political parties if he wants.



Ironically, the very forces that the general and Ms Bhutto had created now pose the biggest threat to them. For it was during Ms Bhutto’s second term in office in 1994, when General Musharraf was her Director General of Military Operations, that they projected the Taliban as a force to further Pakistani interests in Afghanistan.

No. The creation of the Taliban can be traced back to the 1980s when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. The US gave support to the mujahideen to kick out the Soviets. So technically the United States is responsible for creating the Taliban.

As always, Hindustan articles are biased.

But yes we should war India again, since were the onces that start the wars. :pakistan:
 

Errrm, no. He still has control over the army. He could do away with political parties if he wants.


The article was talking about Mushy's presidency. Not his control over the army.
His presidency and popular support is waning, as per the article.

No. The creation of the Taliban can be traced back to the 1980s when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. The US gave support to the mujahideen to kick out the Soviets. So technically the United States is responsible for creating the Taliban.

As always, Hindustan articles are biased.

But yes we should war India again, since were the onces that start the wars. :pakistan:

The article talks about Benazir supporting the Taliban, not creating them.

Benazir's regime used Taliban to further Pakistani interests, as per the article, and made them stronger.

A war with India isn't just a big mistake, it might be the biggest mistake in the history of Pakistan.
 
Stealth Assassin;108144[SIZE="4" said:
As Pakistan drifts, the problem for India is that Islamabad’s military rulers might try to divert attention by indulging in military adventurism.[/SIZE] Which means a real danger of increased militancy in Kashmir, more active insurgencies in the North-east and terrorist strikes in the subcontinent.
HindustanTimes-Print
© Copyright 2007 Hindustan Times

Ohh please spare us the as usual BS propaganda from India. All in the world are they worried What crap. It seems the Dr. has lost his mind completely.
 
Ohh please spare us the as usual BS propaganda from India. All in the world are they worried What crap. It seems the Dr. has lost his mind completely.

I won't debate the involvement of Pakistani rogue agencies in NE and Kashmir, since you obviously will deny everything.


Any comments on the rest of the article? Can I assume that you agree with the rest of it?

P.S. Which Dr.?
 
I won't debate the involvement of Pakistani rogue agencies in NE and Kashmir, since you obviously will deny everything.

You can debate all you want, its a freedom of speech, but do you think we care. No we dont. And yes our agencies are involved the sameway yours are into pakistan. Its a tit for tat.

Any comments on the rest of the article? Can I assume that you agree with the rest of it?

Actually No! i dont want to waste my time and argue over nothing. You can believe what ever you want too, i dont give a damn about it anyways.

P.S. Which Dr.?

Your PM.
 
You can debate all you want, its a freedom of speech, but do you think we care. No we dont. And yes our agencies are involved the sameway yours are into pakistan. Its a tit for tat.

Well then, I did expect better from you...

Actually No! i dont want to waste my time and argue over nothing. You can believe what ever you want too, i dont give a damn about it anyways.

Ok. I get the point.


He didn't write the article. Nor does he have any influence over the person who wrote it.
 
problem for India is that Islamabad’s military rulers might try to divert attention by indulging in military adventurism.Which means a real danger of increased militancy in Kashmir, more active insurgencies in the North-east and terrorist strikes in the subcontinent.

I hope pakistan does all the above and helps the sikhs get a homeland.:pakistan:
 
I won't debate the involvement of Pakistani rogue agencies in NE and Kashmir, since you obviously will deny everything.

The only wrong with the above statement is that they are "rogue"....
They are pakistani security people involved in helping to liberate these people from indian oppression.
 
I hope pakistan does all the above and helps the sikhs get a homeland.:pakistan:

The only wrong with the above statement is that they are "rogue"....
They are pakistani security people involved in helping to liberate these people from indian oppression.


I don't understand. On one hand,dabong, you want a peaceful south asia, and on the other hand you openly support destabilizing your neighbour.

I would understand if you were an extremist. But you seem like a normal guy like anyone else. Then why would you support such things? Can't you see that it will lead Pakistan and infact the entire subcontinent to disaster?

Why would you have intelligence agencies working to destabilize India instead of stabilizing Pakistan?
 
I don't understand. On one hand,dabong, you want a peaceful south asia, and on the other hand you openly support destabilizing your neighbour.
Acctually! sometimes you have to give your peaceful neighbor a taste of her medicine.

I would understand if you were an extremist. But you seem like a normal guy like anyone else. Then why would you support such things? Can't you see that it will lead Pakistan and infact the entire subcontinent to disaster?
If india cant see it, then we can ignore that too.

Why would you have intelligence agencies working to destabilize India instead of stabilizing Pakistan?
:rofl::rofl:


Regards
Wilco
 
Acctually! sometimes you have to give your peaceful neighbor a taste of her medicine.

Her medicine? Dude, this is crazy talk. Eye-for-an-eye bullshit.
Regular guys in both countries are not involved in any "medicine", real or imagined.

Kindly stop looking at India as a blurry chunk of Hindu extremists.

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.


If regular people on both sides don't see the futility of all this, how will it ever stop?

If india cant see it, then we can ignore that too.

You don't understand what I am saying.

Let Intelligence agencies do whatever.

I'm talking on a personal level. Don't you and dabong want all this crap to stop? Europe made peace, why not south asia?


:rofl::rofl:


Regards
Wilco

I don't think I have your regards at all. Please stop the hypocrisy and don't give regards if you don't mean to.
 
He didn't write the article. Nor does he have any influence over the person who wrote it.

I didnt say he did. But he's the current PM of india and every policy has his influence whether its the media or anything else. He seems to be quite anti pakistan these days specially when he's seeing a possibility of destabilizing pakistan utilizing the full potential of the current political unstability. And so the media represent him and his government how they think about pakistan.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom