A discrepancy in serial no of R-73 missile displayed by Pakistan

[Suriya]

I found a discrepancy in serial no of R-73 missile displayed by Pakistan.
It lacks - I - sign in it's serial number while all other R-73 missiles have them.



serial no of R-73 missile displayed by Pakistan

While all other R-73 missiles have -I- sign in the middle of the serial no on the missile tail section.

1. Here you can see -I- sign, then 4840246

2. Here you can see -I- sign, then 12098361

3. Here you can see -I- sign, then numerals

4. Here you can see -I- sign, then numerals

5. Here you can see -I- sign, then numerals

6 Here you can see -I- sign, then numerals

 

[Microsoft]

Here's the discrepancy in the F-16 serial number the r-73 shot down:

 

[Suriya]

Here's the discrepancy in the F-16 serial number the r-73 shot down:
View attachment 668864

I would look bit more serious answer for this unusual discrepancy from people who are more knowledgeable than you.

@airomerix @HRK @Myth_buster_1 @Basel @Windjammer @Joe Shearer @MastanKhan @PanzerKiel

 

[Microsoft]

I would look bit more serious answer for this unusual discrepancy from people who are more knowledgeable than you.

@airomerix @HRK @Myth_buster_1 @Basel @Windjammer @Joe Shearer @MastanKhan

I agree those mentioned are more knowledgeable about this matter than me. But the question is will you believe them? I get the feeling you prefer to be ignorant.

 

[Suriya]

I agree those mentioned are more knowledgeable about this matter than me. But the question is will you believe them? I get the feeling you prefer to be ignorant.

We are all here to discuss and debate on these sort of things and present our views, believe or not believe is a separate issue.

 

[LeGenD]

@Suriya

From where Pakistan would obtain a (deformed) R-73 missile and display it? Kindly explain.

 

[Kompromat]

Trauma is deep.

 

[SQ8]

It does have the “I” so the assertion is incorrect. What is lacking is the space in between the I and that points to the two different batches and changes in format.

Semantics for self satisfaction, nothing that affects facts.

 

[Suriya]

@Suriya

From where Pakistan would obtain a (deformed) R-73 missile and display it? Kindly explain.

Rhetorical question. I' ve already shown how the right side R-73 missile parts are missing in the video clip of wreckage site in the 27th feb thread.

It does have the “I” so the assertion is incorrect. What is lacking is the space in between the I and that points to the two different batches and changes in format.

Semantics for self satisfaction, nothing that affects facts.

That's why i gave six samples and from different batches. All export and non-export versions from different batches hv numeral variations but -I- sign exists in all of them.

 

[Microsoft]

We are all here to discuss and debate on these sort of things and present our views, believe or not believe is a separate issue.

The thing about facts is your beliefs don't matter

 

[Metal 0-1]

I found a discrepancy in serial no of R-73 missile displayed by Pakistan.
It lacks - I - sign in it's serial number while all other R-73 missiles have them.



serial no of R-73 missile displayed by Pakistan

View attachment 668848


While all other R-73 missiles have -I- sign in the middle of the serial no on the missile tail section.

1. Here you can see -I- sign, then 4840246


View attachment 668852

2. Here you can see -I- sign, then 12098361
View attachment 668853


3. Here you can see -I- sign, then numerals

View attachment 668854

4. Here you can see -I- sign, then numerals


View attachment 668855


5. Here you can see -I- sign, then numeralsView attachment 668856

6 Here you can see -I- sign, then numerals
View attachment 668858

You Indians can't over it...

 

[PakFactor]

It does have the “I”, the Sadma is deep with this one.

 

[Salman876]

India specific enhancement

 

[Flash_Ninja]

Heres one without the "1" in its serial:

Here's a high quality render which also doesnt have that style:

 

[Suriya]

Heres one without the "1" in its serial:

View attachment 668910

It's not clear from the pic. -I- most likely present.