the part you missing is that when a missile enters its terminal phase for few seconds stalls and then gravity pulls it toward the target, AD systems like PAC strike the BMs in their terminal phase when they are not moving otherwise when their speed passes from a certain threshold they can't strike it.
Ur Safir is enlargened North Korean Scud. Ur Simorgh is variatio of North Korean Unha. But you still failed to copy it.
Lets chek. In 2006 when Israel was busy with Palestinian Intifada Hezbollah launched a sneak attack on Israel.
AN/MPQ-65 (PAC-3) Under the PAC-3 program the MPQ-53 radar set has been replaced with the MPQ-65. The MPQ-65 is a passive radar meaning it does not emit any signals, but instead collects signals edited from aircraft. This allows the radar to remain undetected as it tracks targets. [v] The upgraded MPQ-65 radar can track up to 100 targets at once. The baseline features are enhanced to better counter developing threats like maneuverable ballistic missiles, stealth cruise missile, and aircraft.[vi] Using a C-band frequency, the radar carries a range of over 100km and is also operated by using the MSP-104 ESC.[vii] The AN/MPQ-65 radar uses a second traveling wave tube (TWT) which allocates more search, detection, and tracking, capabilities than the MPQ-53.[viii] - MDAA
PAC-3 and PAC-3 MSE can defeat an advanced ballistic missile in the terminal phase of its flight, provided the ballistic missile breach the target engagement envelope of either (~35 KM ceiling). Effectiveness of the system is in how it is employed; to shield high value targets and/or facilities. These systems have defeated targets representative of MRBM class speed and range during operationally realistic trials, therefore MACH 6 cap is not true.
THAAD can shield entire cities from ballistic missiles, and can defeat any ballistic missile type because its target acquisition envelope is massive and interceptors are hypersonic.
Friend, you are not making any sense here.
no atcually they can't. PAC-3 anti ballistic missile range is 20 km, this means most of saudi and emirati lands can successfully hit without trying to saturate their ADs.i agree with you THAAD and PAC_3 are powerful systems and they can intercept our missiles but the point is they can not do that because Iran arsenal is very big and they will overwhelm any system that is near Iran and interceptors are very expensive for every missile of that systems that USA use Iran can make up to ~4 ballistic missile and if one of there warheads goes throw which certainly at least 1 goes, they can kiss that system good bye. and it will get harder when Iranian missiles carry 3 maneuverable warheads and they are coming at hypersonic speeds and from different trajectories.
First of all calm down with ur name calling.Safir is a decade old kid, next you'll be posting ancient archaeological pics.
Simorgh and Unha are very different:
One is a 2 stage missile the other a 3 stage. But of course you're mentally handicapped and don't realise something so simple.
On contrary, we entered Lebanon because of Hezbollah.
We dont need to defeat Hezbollah (what we are supposed to do, ethnically clease Hezbiie population like u do in Syria? We can calm down Hezbollah and we successfully did it. They can now only bark from their bunkers.
OK time will tell
