What's new

A cloud over India's Muslims

. .
along with the evidence of pak involvement in mumbai!!!!

Yeah you tell him bro. They will only give you carefully crafted and filtered "proof", the same bs that they are feeding international law enforcement right now.

Even the US is backing down from anti Pak rhetoric in it's god forsaken media because of the carnival it has seen in Bumbai. India kay pyjama nikalgaee.
 
.
Yeah you tell him bro. They will only give you carefully crafted and filtered "proof", the same bs that they are feeding international law enforcement right now.

Even the US is backing down from anti Pak rhetoric in it's god forsaken media because of the carnival it has seen in Bumbai. India kay pyjama nikalgaee.

Ab pakistan govt. ka bhi Rice ne nikala hai. Latest reports dekhiye.
 
. .
Yeah you tell him bro. They will only give you carefully crafted and filtered "proof", the same bs that they are feeding international law enforcement right now.

Even the US is backing down from anti Pak rhetoric in it's god forsaken media because of the carnival it has seen in Bumbai. India kay pyjama nikalgaee.

wrong .
Rice tells Pakistan to act ‘or US will’ -DAWN - Top Stories; December 06, 2008

I had posted this link in the forumn captured CST terrorist. But reading your distasteful comment here couldnt stop myself from reposting it
 
.
That is the best you can com up with?:cheesy:

yeah its our best but i know that's nothing when compared it to you....i wonder the evidence of mumbai is completed or still under progress..:woot:
 
.
why dont you care to have a look at the link I posted above
it is from your own country
 
. .
did they mentioned what evidence you've got???
 
.
wrong .
Rice tells Pakistan to act ‘or US will’ -DAWN - Top Stories; December 06, 2008

I had posted this link in the forumn captured CST terrorist. But reading your distasteful comment here couldnt stop myself from reposting it

Are you expecting me to act surprised? Anyone with half a brain could see this coming and I have been monitoring it, Pakistan will give her the usual treatment and she will go back to her doghouse. The real power is with Pakistan. We control their supply lines, we can shut down their misadventure in Afghanistan with or without India threatening us on the border, all they can do is bark and so far we have been listening but with India in the equation I think that might change. Nobody is afraid of drones either, this is the product of failed governance not a weak military.
 
.
yess, we can always tell them that your WOT is over and now go and fu*k yourselves...
 
.
Are you expecting me to act surprised? Anyone with half a brain could see this coming and I have been monitoring it, Pakistan will give her the usual treatment and she will go back to her doghouse. The real power is with Pakistan. We control their supply lines, we can shut down their misadventure in Afghanistan with or without India threatening us on the border, all they can do is bark and so far we have been listening but with India in the equation I think that might change. Nobody is afraid of drones either, this is the product of failed governance not a weak military.

hmm
so you were expecting that US would implicate Pakistan directly

BTW you have claimed in the thread 'captured CST terrorist that US is not blaming Pakistan and also in this thread you claimed Even the US is backing down from anti Pak rhetoric .

But in the quoted post you are saying that you could see it coming(that US would implicate Pakistan)
So it seems that what you post , you dont believe in that or you think something and post something else :confused:
 
.
yess, we can always tell them that your WOT is over and now go and fu*k yourselves...

You can' really. USA is keeping you from going under. China and Saudi have turned their back.

Meg Lundsager
By Dr Farrukh Saleem



Osama's prayers have been heard. The American economy is going down the drain. What Osama did not know was that when the American economy goes down the drain the global economy goes to the dogs. Look at Pakistan, for instance: sixty-two per cent of all our exports are textile-related and nearly two-thirds of our textile exports are bought by American consumers. America is in a recession and American consumers are buying no more. Some 38 per cent of our labour force is employed by our textile sector and our textile sector is shutting down. Pakistan is thus becoming one of the worst of victims of the American recession.

What we need now is collective prayers for the resurrection of the American economic might. The sooner the better -- or Pakistan goes belly up. What we also need is prayers for a person by the name of Meg Lundsager because she is International Monetary Fund's US executive director and she is the one who raised her right hand and voted America's 371,743 votes in favour of Pakistan. Or, Pakistan would have gone belly up.


Would the IMF be good or bad for Pakistanis? Well, our problems are threefold: one, the 'trust deficit' -- the outside world does not trust that the government of Pakistan would do the right thing. Two, the budgetary deficit -- the government of Pakistan raises Rs1.5 trillion as revenues and spends Rs2 trillion. Three, the trade deficit -- we import goods worth $35 billion and export goods worth $20 billion.

We have clearly failed to put our house in order. Walks in the IMF. Its goal is to narrow the budgetary deficit (from 7.4 per cent to 4.2 per cent of GDP) and close the import-export gap. The IMF's goal is financial discipline. The IMF has set 'targets', it has set 'measures' and it has set 'conditionalities'. The IMF's ideology is Keynesian (mostly based on the ideas of 20th century British economist John Keynes). And, that means four things: increasing taxation, decreasing government expenditure, increasing the rate of interest and devaluation.

I have absolutely no problem with IMF's goals. I want Pakistan to reach a destination which is not much different from what the IMF envisions -- macroeconomic stability. My difference with the IMF comes in the route taken to reach that destination. My personal ideal would be a 'supply-side' approach that relies heavily on providing tax incentives to individuals in order to increase the overall productive capacity of an economy (supply side is mostly based on the ideas of the Canadian-born Professor Robert Mundell and the American-born Professor Arthur Laffer). To be certain, our extended and consecutive collective failures make my personal ideal rather irrelevant. It's the IMF so its Keynesian economics and it's all about increasing taxation, interest rates and currency adjustments.

Why is the IMF all for Keynesian and not for supply-side? For that we must look at the governing structure of the IMF. The United States by itself controls close to 17 per cent of the entire pool of votes followed by Japan, Germany, France and the UK. Collectively, the five control nearly 40 per cent of all votes (the other 180 members control the remaining 60 per cent). In effect, the IMF must look after the interests of the US, Japan, Germany, France and the UK (before it does anything else). In essence, the IMF therefore is more of a political than an economic entity.

The fact that two out of three Pakistanis are at or below $2 a day is something that the IMF can afford to put on the backburner but that's something that Pakistan cannot ignore. An increase in taxation would mean a further slowdown in the economy. A further slowdown would mean increased unemployment. Same thing with the rate of interest; this high cost of capital is bound to shut down a lot of our industrial units -- and that means even more unemployment.

All this slowdown and all this additional unemployment could very well bring Pakistanis out on to the streets -- and that means a full blown political crisis. There is no denying that we are in a terrible financial mess. With the IMF in the equation the question now is if a serious, full-blown political crisis can somehow be averted.

Meg Lundsager has helped Pakistan dodge bankruptcy but can the IMF keep Pakistanis away from food riots?

The News International - No. 1 English Newspaper from Pakistan - Saturday, December 30, 1899
 
Last edited:
.
@ mr. munshi

ur article is just real crap, stop posting these nonsense :tsk:


@ zaheerkhan, @ nihat, @ gareebnawaz

u r the ppl who makes us even prouder :smitten: :tup: :yahoo:

u r just real brother of us

ppl like u can take india and sacred religion like islam forward

and guys thanks a lot to present our(indian) view towards this rubbish article so strongly

u really deserve :pop: , :cheers: and a big :enjoy:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom