A Chinese traitor known as Chai Jing

[ChineseTiger1986]

Wen is politically liberal, but his economics is not neoliberal, not like Zhu Rongji. He is pretty conservative economically when he moved in to save the SOEs during 2009 and start the infrastructure construction. Sure, it resulted in local debt, but it is worth for the infrastructure which changed China from what looked like a 3rd world country, to a 1st world country.

He shouldn't encourage the privatization by the end of his term.

温家宝：引导民间资本参与国企改革_国内财经_新浪财经_新浪网

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

He shouldn't encourage the privatization by the end of his term.

温家宝：引导民间资本参与国企改革_国内财经_新浪财经_新浪网

During the end of his term he took a very strange direction in his policies.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

During the end of his term he took a very strange direction in his policies.

He could get blackmailed by the foreign power as they got the dirt of his family.

 

[sahaliyan]

He shouldn't encourage the privatization by the end of his term.

温家宝：引导民间资本参与国企改革_国内财经_新浪财经_新浪网

Privatization is not a wrong thing,sometimes it's right sometimes wrong,Wen's decision in 2009 is correct,also unlike the western countries spend their money in welfare,we spend the money in infrastructure,so many roads and railroads built,will benefit us in the long-term

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Privatization is not a wrong thing,sometimes it's right sometimes wrong,Wen's decision in 2009 is correct,also unlike the western countries spend their money in welfare,we spend the money in infrastructure,so many roads and railroads built,will benefit us in the long-term

The privatization on micro is not entirely wrong, but on macro, nope.

When the privatization is happened on everything, then we will end up like the US where the bankers can control the government.

 

[Nan Yang]

Saw part 1 of the Under the Dome video. I do not see anything wrong with the video. In fact the video target the local audience and in no way she appear anywhere near being a traitor. I believe the only way you can solve environmental problems are more people like her. If people do not care, then the problem will never be solve. And as people standard of living increases, people look for a more quality life and more will be sensitive to environmental issues. Environmental issues cannot rely just on the CCP. The people must participate.

 

[55100864]

She is just a naive girl, you know who is the real traitor? an engineer in Wuhan who sold some critical information of 093, 094 nuclear sub to the US, fortunately, he was captured and executed，we also captured a CIA informer.

 

[Borr]

lol

The focus is "them" enjoy the monopoly and they needs some good clean up to shed off their accumulated rusty inefficiencies. The state monopoly will still be there, be it the monopoly of one or two or three companies, that's detail and it doesn't matter. From the point view of the ultimate owner (the state) and the ultimate customer (the common people), the machinery(oil companies) needs periodic maintenance.

Just look at the big corporations in USA, which one is not monopolized?

At least the monopoly with the SOE is better than the monopoly with the POE.

Therefore, I choose the lesser of the two devils.

Chai Jing is obviously a libtard who knows nothing about science but to spew her venom campaign.

No matter how you liberal lovers keep whining, but you have to see who got the power right now.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

lol

The focus is "them" enjoy the monopoly and they needs some good clean up to shed off their accumulated rusty inefficiencies. The state monopoly will still be there, be it the monopoly of one or two or three companies, that's detail and it doesn't matter. From the point view of the ultimate owner (the state) and the ultimate customer (the common people), the machinery(oil companies) needs periodic maintenance.

There is no utopia, but either the monopoly of the SOE or the monopoly of the POE.

But I think former is still far better than the later.

 

[Jlaw]

The privatization on micro is not entirely wrong, but on macro, nope.

When the privatization is happened on everything, then we will end up like the US where the bankers can control the government.

Yes, you nailed it. The US is a good example of plutocracy.

Saw part 1 of the Under the Dome video. I do not see anything wrong with the video. In fact the video target the local audience and in no way she appear anywhere near being a traitor. I believe the only way you can solve environmental problems are more people like her. If people do not care, then the problem will never be solve. And as people standard of living increases, people look for a more quality life and more will be sensitive to environmental issues. Environmental issues cannot rely just on the CCP. The people must participate.

The problem is, enivronmentalists are hypocrites themselves. They want everyone else to reduce carbon footprint, they want everyone else to live like 1745 except them. They prefer to travel around the world giving lectures, when video conference will suffice. The wealthier one will buy huge mansions--causing more environmental damage.

 

[grand]

Saw part 1 of the Under the Dome video. I do not see anything wrong with the video. In fact the video target the local audience and in no way she appear anywhere near being a traitor. I believe the only way you can solve environmental problems are more people like her. If people do not care, then the problem will never be solve. And as people standard of living increases, people look for a more quality life and more will be sensitive to environmental issues. Environmental issues cannot rely just on the CCP. The people must participate.

the problem people has with her is not that she made a video about pullution, but she used fake data to promote her agenda.

 

[sahaliyan]

The privatization on micro is not entirely wrong, but on macro, nope.

When the privatization is happened on everything, then we will end up like the US where the bankers can control the government.

In China,it's the special interests group control the government,Xi is not angel,he is part of the problem.`
国企垄断对老百姓没啥好处，美国页岩气大多数都是小企业搞的，企业多有竞争才会有技术进步和创新，两桶油垄断之下，屁民一点脾气没有。我不认为两桶油应该私有化，但支持拆分，以利于市场竞争

 

[NiceGuy]

There will be more and more 'traitor' when China cant stop HK 'revolt' incited by TW-US

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

In China,it's the special interests group control the government,Xi is not angel,he is part of the problem.`
国企垄断对老百姓没啥好处，美国页岩气大多数都是小企业搞的，企业多有竞争才会有技术进步和创新，两桶油垄断之下，屁民一点脾气没有。我不认为两桶油应该私有化，但支持拆分，以利于市场竞争

You better check to the fact of their so-called small enterprises taken over the business.

Do you think their SpaceX can do anything without the NASA support?

 

[Keel]

柴静

Does she have a problem in her body check after living in China for so long?