92 per cent of Pakistani netizens believe iron brotherhood between China and Pak will last

[INDIAPOSITIVE]

China-Pakistan Friendship has Big Support Among People: Survey

File Photo: Chinese President Xi Jinping with Pakistan's Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif (Associated Press)



It said 73 per cent of Chinese and 63 per cent of Pakistani netizens believe the bilateral ties are a vivid embodiment of the saying, "A friend in need is a friend indeed," a Xinhua report said.

In the survey, 92 per cent of Pakistani netizens said the iron brotherhood between China and Pakistan will never go rusty.

Netizens said the upcoming visit of President Xi to Pakistan will lift the China-Pakistan strategic cooperative partnership to a new level.

Xi will arrive in Pakistan on April 20 on a two-day visit during which he would formally launch the $46-billion China-Pakistan Corridor project, connecting China's Xinjiang with Pakistan's Gwadar port.

The 3000-kilometre long route via the Azad Kashmir (Azad Kashmir) will be connected with highways, railways and pipelines.


China-Pakistan Friendship has Big Support Among People: Survey

 

[indianBong]

In the survey, 92 per cent of Pakistani netizens said the iron brotherhood between China and Pakistan will never go rusty.

only time will tell that (though history says otherwise)..... till then Best of luck....

 

[Skywalker]

Few things, it's not Pakistan occupied Kashmir it's Pakistan side of liberated Kashmir.

There is no such thing as **** it's Pakistan.

Last but not the least who gives a fcuk what NDTV a fcuking Indian tv channel thinks. You can only expect a deliberate mistake by a moronic Indian tv channel.

 

[Peshawar Khan]

only time will tell that (though history says otherwise)

and also tension with India will never reduced.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

There is no 'brotherhood' in international states. There is shared interests and if they converge you get 'friendship' or if they sufficiently diverge 'rivalry'.

At present without a doubt Pakistan and China share common perspective and thus the close cooperation.

States are legal entities and cannot be treated as biological entity.

 

[Rocky25]

Few things, it's not Pakistan occupied Kashmir it's Pakistan side of liberated Kashmir.

There is no such thing as **** it's Pakistan.

Last but not the least who gives a fcuk what NDTV a fcuking Indian tv channel thinks. You can only expect a deliberate mistake by a moronic Indian tv channel.

It is Pakistan-forcefully occupied Kashmir... And ****'s use it for terrorism related activities!

and also tension with India will never reduced.

Yeah, Slowly India's YoY rise in defense budget is nearing Pakistan's defence budget of the year... I don't think the same pressure can be maintained!

 

[Skywalker]

It is Pakistan-forcefully occupied Kashmir... And ****'s use it for terrorism related activities!


Yeah, Slowly India's YoY rise in defense budget is nearing Pakistan's defence budget of the year... I don't think the same pressure can be maintained!

Yes sir, take it back, did you like the Pakistani waving of Pakistani flag waving couple of days back in Indian occupied Kashmir or still your arse is burning. Pakis are better than gay hind.

 

[PWFI]

It is Pakistan-forcefully occupied Kashmir... And ****'s use it for terrorism related activities!

self delete

 

[TankMan]

As long as China doesn't try to become a hegemony, which I'm sure it won't, Pakistan and China will enjoy strong ties.
And Azad Kashmir is not occupied. The Azad Kashmiris proudly call themselves Azad Kashmiris. I'm sure they know their own opinion better than NDTV does.

How a inferior darky brainwashed hindutva warrior could know the difference between forcefully occupied or not?
And why would we us kashmir to kill "bhookha nanga" peoples of Rapistan, what we have to gain? they are dying from hunger.

Personal and racial attacks are a very, very bad way of arguing with people. You'll only end up having yourself and your country insulted.

If you were angry when you typed all that, have a glass of water, calm down and then come and edit your post. There are many better ways of arguing with Indians. (or anyone else, for that matter)

 

[Shamain]

There is no 'brotherhood' in international states. There is shared interests and if the converge 'friendship' or if they sufficiently diverge 'rivalry'.

At present without a doubt Pakistan and China share common perspective and thus the close cooperation.

States are legal entities and cannot be treated as biological entity.

Biological entity?,friendship is never biological.
There is absolutely no harm in two or x number of nations in developing or holding affable feelings towards each other. This thing also plays its part in intl relations.
Why else are students,scientists, reasearchers and all other kinds of exchange programs are organized.
Here the article is abt internet users from both ends,
There could be diplomatic friendly ties btw two govs but could exist mutual feelings of hostility amongst citizens and vice versa.
But if relations btw pak and china thrive on all fronts then why not?

And btw we Pakistanis are also some very loving,sincere, cordial, hospitable people.
Oh ihope no one from accross the eastern border felt hurt. Lolz one never knows ,some people.

 

[moisrar47]

Let's just hope this friendship lasts a lifetime

 

[ArsalanKhan21]

This friendship is based on geopolitical considerations. China is source armaments for Pakistan and both have fought wars with India. Pakistan is more closer to Afghanistan and Iran culturally than China.

 

[Shamain]

This friendship is based on geopolitical considerations. China is source armaments for Pakistan and both have fought wars with India. Pakistan is more closer to Afghanistan and Iran culturally than China.

Over emphasis on culturally parts always bring xenophobias. Lets broaden our horizons.

 

[TankMan]

This friendship is based on geopolitical considerations. China is source armaments for Pakistan and both have fought wars with India. Pakistan is more closer to Afghanistan and Iran culturally than China.

This alliance is indeed based on geopolitics, but cultural similarity is not required for peoples to have positive feelings for each other.

 

[abbasalai]