It warrants a visit to history and making tall claims. Recent clash has settled pretty much standard as how to judge PAF V/s IAF. From Retd. AM Shaid Latif to everyone, having close links or being an Ex-PAF confirmed. Also, ISPR himself mentioned two kills by PAF and Heli wasn't our shot.
Secondly, Alan Warnes recently met with PAF CAS and he himself disclosed about SU-30 being shot by PAF. The claim wasn't made just like that but saw enough proof when he asked PAF for. What Alan has to do in this all or praise PAF? In fact the person like Alan Warnes wouldn't compromise over his own credibility in aviation world especially his reporting credibility in certain matters.
Do we ever found PAF in habit to make claims and go blazing like IAF did in this whole episode? Also, it was a nervous breakdown for IAF that didn't challenge PAF anymore and despite all that false sense of superiority (MKI being Mini Awacs & Asian Raptor) did not attempt to make it even for India. How come MODI felt the absence of Rafale when IAF was already flying superior A/C in shape of MKI (Qualitatively & in quantity as well). The thing is, both of kills delivered a blow that adversary did not dare to come back or continue chase rather went back to home most probably licking wounds and planning further. I can safely assume that further surprises by way of more evidence or any possible leak, will make its way but on right day & right time. It is indeed a highly valued evidence in multiple dimension. Oh by the way, right on the evening of 27/2, Russian MoFA was in Islamabad and met few people behind the doors.
