9/11 Total lie, Scientifically proved by Indian Scientist.

[DRaisinHerald]

Why would anybody need to kill its own people to attack a muslim country?
Did not they attack iraq? They could have just attacked afganistan without killing own people and destroying own building. right?

But what would be the justification of attacking Afghanistan out of nowhere? Do you seriously think that would've gotten any support, both in America and elsewhere?

 

[livingdead]

But what would be the justification of attacking Afghanistan out of nowhere? Do you seriously think that would've gotten any support, both in America and elsewhere?

When did bush and co ever cared about what others think.
Did not they go to iraq inspite of opposition?
Are you still cluching to straws mate. US has various ways to make countries fall in line. A large scale terror attack which pushed US into recession has to be the worst idea to attack afganistan.
It could have easily done such a false flag on one of its allies where life is cheap, dont you think?

 

[Aktavist_KKWC]

Why would anybody need to kill its own people to attack a muslim country?
Did not they attack iraq? They could have just attacked afganistan without killing own people and destroying own building. right?

which islamic empire are you talking about? maldives?

It's a dormant empire. Remember the empire did not collapse by itself even though it was pretty weak. Western nations helped to finish it off and then set up puppet states with puppet rulers to ensure it doesn't come back quickly. The Islamic Empire is simply built on Muslims joining in unison for common interests and against common enemies. It's like no other empire before, it's not based on race or region but on belief, a belief system which is not just very much alive but growing. It's just a matter of time before this empire is awake again from it's slumber. The more the western nations attack Islam and Muslims the quicker it's revival is coming about.

There are many reasons why they set up 911 and conducted one of the biggest deceptions in the history of mankind but the main reason was to give them leverage to protect the Zionist state and to go to war with for the Zionist state. It's obviously made life easier for Israel to continue stealing land and there is no way multiple attacks on nations including Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Somalia could take place without the excuse of 911.

 

[Yeti]

But what would be the justification of attacking Afghanistan out of nowhere? Do you seriously think that would've gotten any support, both in America and elsewhere?

Well Bush said to the Taliban to hand OBL over they refused and the boots went in very simple.

9/11, 7/7, bali, madrid all done by Islamic militants thats a fact.

 

[Desert Fox]

but isn't it funny that the same al-ciada that blew up the twoers is now being funded and supplied by NATO and America in Libya and Syria.

Tells you a lot doesn't it?

al-ciada also says that American and NATO supported it in Libya by providing it weapons.


Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links - Telegraph

Libyan War: The Truth -- US Supporting al Qaeda Insurgents Against the Will of the Libyan People


Why is the United States Helping Al Qaeda in Libya? | UNCOVERAGE.net

More links below:
Libya: the West and al-Qaeda on the same side - Telegraph

» U.S. Government Backs Libyan Al-Qaeda While Hyping Terror Attacks Inside U.S. Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Al Qaida commander backs Libyan rebels in message

Truth Revealed: Al Qaeda Part Of Libyan Rebels, U.S. Helping Fighters Who Killed Americans In Iraq! at Pat Dollard

 

[livingdead]

It's a dormant empire. Remember the empire did not collapse by itself even though it was pretty weak. Western nations helped to finish it off and then set up puppet states with puppet rulers to ensure it doesn't come back quickly. The Islamic Empire is simply built on Muslims joining in unison for common interests and against common enemies. It's like no other empire before, it's not based on race or region but on belief, a belief system which is not just very much alive but growing. It's just a matter of time before this empire is awake again from it's slumber. The more the western nations attack Islam and Muslims the quicker it's revival is coming about.

There are many reasons why they set up 911 and conducted one of the biggest deceptions in the history of mankind but the main reason was to give them leverage to protect the Zionist state and to go to war with for the Zionist state. It's obviously made life easier for Israel to continue stealing land and there is no way multiple attacks on nations including Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Somalia could take place without the excuse of 911.

Again, why would US need an alibi to protect israel. It has been doing it even during cold war.
Now as a sole superpower nobody can oppose US, even if it continues to support israel.
What is the need of killing own people then?

why do you think US cant attack all these countries without 911. Who would stop USA?

 

[ashokdeiva]

some stupid accusations with out sub stantial sceintific evidance.

 

[Yeti]

Before 9/11 even went down Ramzi Yousef used a truck bomb to attack the World Trade Center in New York City. After the attack, Yousef fled to Pakistan and later moved to Manila. In 1995, he was arrested at a guest house in Islamabad, by the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence and United States Diplomatic Security Service.

 

[Aktavist_KKWC]

Again, why would US need an alibi to protect israel. It has been doing it even during cold war.
Now as a sole superpower nobody can oppose US, even if it continues to support israel.
What is the need of killing own people then?

why do you think US cant attack all these countries without 911. Who would stop USA?

I hate to repeat myself but Israeli leaders themselves have openly stated 911 was good for them. Therefore we can conclude 911 allows America and Israel to continue with the plans without having to justify them as much. Sure they could have done it anyway but wouldn't have had the same sympathy and backing. Now in every debate which successfully argues against Zionist or Amerian foriegn policy they simply resort to 'well 911' blah blah blah.

There are many reasons but you cannot ever know the fully what they are unless you are involved. Just because you don't know the full reasons doesn't mean 911 wasn't an inside job when it's clear to anyone with a bit of common sense it was.

 

[gambit]

None of those buildings fell at near free fall speed on to their own footprints.

How fast they fall is irrelevant. What is relevant is that no aircraft struck the Egyptian textile building, which is concrete and not steel like the WTC towers, and that the building was only 6-story tall. Now explain how is that possible. How could a fire cause a concrete building to fall when concrete is preferred over steel for fire behaviors. This was in Egypt, not in America.

 

[VCheng]

How fast they fall is irrelevant. What is relevant is that no aircraft struck the Egyptian textile building, which is concrete and not steel like the WTC towers, and that the building was only 6-story tall. Now explain how is that possible. How could a fire cause a concrete building to fall when concrete is preferred over steel for fire behaviors. This was in Egypt, not in America.

Well, Egypt is right next to Israel, so they must have something to do with that too!

(So, there, you have your explanation! )

 

[BATMAN]

How fast they fall is irrelevant. What is relevant is that no aircraft struck the Egyptian textile building, which is concrete and not steel like the WTC towers, and that the building was only 6-story tall. Now explain how is that possible. How could a fire cause a concrete building to fall when concrete is preferred over steel for fire behaviors. This was in Egypt, not in America.

It is very relevant, how building fell.

How do you explain evaporation of tons of steel girders and reinforced steel bars.

How do you explain the concrete turning to powder!

 

[Hulk]

How fast they fall is irrelevant. What is relevant is that no aircraft struck the Egyptian textile building, which is concrete and not steel like the WTC towers, and that the building was only 6-story tall. Now explain how is that possible. How could a fire cause a concrete building to fall when concrete is preferred over steel for fire behaviors. This was in Egypt, not in America.

Try convincing someone who has already made up their mind. You are wasting time dude.

 

[gambit]

It is very relevant, how building fell.

Fine. The implication made by this post...

Explain me how could wc7 building got destoried like WC bulding ? Which airplane with fuel hit that building ?

...Is that UNLESS an aircraft hit a building or that the building was of a planned demolition, then it is impossible for any building to collapse from fire.

We have an Egyptian textile building that was only 6-story tall and constructed of concrete, which is a preferable material over steel. You do know that concrete have better fire response behavior than steel, right? Anyway, since this 6-story Egyptian building collapsed from fire with no aircraft hitting it nor was it from a planned demolition, how do you explain its collapse cause?

How do you explain evaporation of tons of steel girders and reinforced steel bars.

How do you explain the concrete turning to powder!

Not sure what you are talking about here but there are plenty of photo evidences with plenty of steel remnants and concrete blocks everywhere.

Plenty of steel and concrete leftovers to me.

Try convincing someone who has already made up their mind. You are wasting time dude.

It is typical, though. After a while all this crap is resurrected again as if these guys ever had anything shockingly new.

 

[Hulk]

What was the motive for us to do so, the response we get is to bomb Afghanistan. How stupid one can get, the superpower US can bomb countries like Afghnanistan at will, they do not need an excuse.