Penguin
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 13,047
- Reaction score
- 56
What is the >official< source for this statement? Is the 300km lo-lo-lo range not simply the result of dividing 800 by the original max range of 300km and multiplying the result by the original lo-lo-lo range of 120km?Sir that's the standard flight path for launch done from either ground or sea level with low-high-low path taken by missile. In low-low-low level flight path the maximum range will come down to 300 KMs approx considering standard 120 km for 290 km full range. Air launched version might have some better range but how much difference will that make, is hard to say. And yes presently this capability is not there which means it wasn't originally planned for this but platform was planned for increment in favorable conditions like we are in presently. Now DRDO had both, political backing as well as external support for range increase. Past point is not in my knowledge. Thank you.
Afaik there is no difference between air and shiplaunched Brahmos. Under those conditions, an airlaunched version will have a better range, as it is launched in the air at altitude at significant forward speed, whereas a shiplaunched version will have to bring itself up to speed and altitude. This burns up rocket motor fuel that does not contribute to range.
To the extent there is a seperate airlaunch version: "BrahMos Aerospace received the required financial allocations in December 2005 to begin R & D work on developing an air-launched variant of the missile. This variant will weigh about 2.5 tonnes, incorporate a smaller rocket booster, and have additional control fins for stability during launch." A smaller booster may mean a larger sustainer = range.
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/a-co...ahmos-block-ii-iii.367764/page-3#post-7012906