Śakra
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2016
- Messages
- 3,930
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
How many lawyers do you have in Canada ?
Stop deflecting. How old are you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many lawyers do you have in Canada ?
Old enough to be your father -- 54.Stop deflecting. How old are you?
Old enough to be your father -- 54.
It is very simple -- government control.Explains your rabid hatred for socialism.
Why is that so difficult to understand ? Do not mix up social assistance programs with socialism.
Buddy, you are no more 'advanced' than US. Cash, checks, credit cards, or even if you go cashless, as long as you need money, you are no more 'advanced' than US. All you have done is have one iteration after another of the representation of money.
Everything about it.So what do you hate about the ACA?
It is very simple -- government control.
Everything about it.
It has nothing to do with politics, even though it is inextricably tied to politics. I just hate -- on principles -- of anyone but me ( or my legal designators ) on what to do with my body. If the Repugnicans tries something similar, I would still object as vehemently. I do have liberal middleclass neighbors who turned against the ACA once they -- as Pelosi stated -- found out the details of the law. Some of them literally had to make the bi-weekly paycheck choice of either food on the table or health insurance. It is that binary. No middle ground.
The idea that we should have health care for everyone regardless of wealth/income is a noble one that I have no problems of supporting. But it is the EXECUTION of this noble idea that gets under everyone's skin. On the one side, we have a group who wants nothing but the government to be responsible. Then on the other side, we have a group who insists on pure market based no oversight methods. The ACA tried to be that middle ground and it failed -- spectacularly.
In principles, health care is only a 'right' in the sense that no one can exclude you from ACCESSING any avenue to health care. You have no more right to health care than you have a right to enter my house without my permission. The idea that if someone created a product then by virtue of being in a community bound by a social contract, everybody have a 'right' to that product is nothing short of Marxism/communism.
You are taking things to the absurd.So do you hate the EPA, FBI, ATF, DOD, USDA, DOJ, Homeland Security, Treasury, VA, FDA, National guard, Army, Navy, Air force? These are all government created and controlled agencies. I don't understand why Americans have rabid paranoia for the government.
In that case, you should work for the principle to be applied to the US Armed Forces.
Each soldier should have a private insurance, if he so chooses.
The Medical Corps should be abolished.
No need for the Government to compete.
You are taking things to the absurd.
Those are security oriented organizations, as in providing security against threats against the country and persons. None of them have any DIRECT control over my personal life, not like health care laws.
As for American paranoia against the government in general, ever heard of the saying 'All monsters are humans' ?
If all monsters are humans, then the most monstrous things to date mankind have suffered have been at the hands of governments. All the good things that governments have done do not excuse all the harms that governments have done. If anything, the good serves only to attempt to rehabilitate the image of the governments for all the harms they have done.
That is a stupid analogy.As long as You use cars, this:
View attachment 388551
is only an iteration of this:
View attachment 388550
and thus no more advanced.
That is a stupid analogy.
First...Your Sweden is STILL using paper checks, a thing that you mocked US as backwards.
Second...The analogy is applicable only if your Sweden drives one iteration of the car while Americans drives the older versions.
We both know that both countries uses paper checks, credit cards, and other forms of money transfers.
Third...The US is a much larger country with inherent barriers that make changes more challenging than your wee bit of a country. The US State of Texas is bigger than you.
And finally...It is hilarious that a Eurosnob would use the American invention of the Internet to say his country is more 'advanced' than the US.
The fact that your country STILL have provisions for financial transactions via paper checks makes you no more 'advanced' than US, pal. When your country's legal system and banks make it official that paper checks are no longer valid tender, come talk down to US. Else -- STFU.The last time I saw someone write a cheque in Sweden was last Millennia. The fact that You can still do it, does not mean that it is normal in use.