What's new

54 years ago, 114 Men of Charlie Company fought to the last Man.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes many surrenderd and Maj Shaitaan Singh has the same orders he and his Charlie Company decided to hold .
India lost that war we all know and accepted it but still there are few who lost their lives fighting like lions ...



I could been happy if you proved that crook Nehru as the main reason behind this Sino war ...but who cares when such Jurnos dare the nations , again such people do what ever to gain publicity again its psychologoical warfare and Intl agencies do that ..... No countrt releases documents of war ....Brits even hold the documents of the American independence war

http://historyinpieces.com/research/nehru-jfk-sino-indian-war

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...ght-us-assistance-during-1962-indo-china-war/

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...list-Neville-Maxwell/articleshow/33094229.cms
 
Last edited:
.
Wow thats only 578 more Chinese killed in a single battle vs the entire Sino Indian war. Also love how they counted all those bodies after all of them died in the battle.


OP was so moved with the story, so he forgot to plug the logic hole. Talking about the importance of critical thinking skills!
 
.
I mean its actually sad that some people would actually believe these stories. Not only do the numbers not add up it requires complete suspension of disbelief to believe that an army that was completely routed pretty much everywhere it fought during the war could even count enemy deaths never mind inflict 11 to 1 kill ratios.
 
.
I mean its actually sad that some people would actually believe these stories. Not only do the numbers not add up it requires complete suspension of disbelief to believe that an army that was completely routed pretty much everywhere it fought during the war could even count enemy deaths never mind inflict 11 to 1 kill ratios.

It is sad these elite members of Indian society lack the ability of critical thinking. Come to think about it, it not that surprising.


I read a CNN article yesterday, an Indian guy interviewed in the story can barely read and write, even in Hindi, and he even has a college degree! Now, think about the ability of those elementary dropouts, of course they are going to believe everything their Gov feed them. Their brains are owned.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/17/asia/india-rickshaw-rupee/
 
Last edited:
.
Is this even a surprise anymore for Indian's superhuman soldiers Bollywood drama?
According to the Indians directed "1967 COLA incident" ONE Indian killed 400 Chinese soldiers in one day
But unfortunately, SORRY, NO videos, NO pictures Available, take it or leave it because Indians say so
OH, how about some so-called "GRAVES" of Chinese soldiers LOL:rofl::rofl:
 
. .
Is this even a surprise anymore for Indian's superhuman soldiers Bollywood drama?
According to the Indians directed "1967 COLA incident" ONE Indian killed 400 Chinese soldiers in one day
But unfortunately, SORRY, NO videos, NO pictures Available, take it or leave it because Indians say so
OH, how about some so-called "GRAVES" of Chinese soldiers LOL:rofl::rofl:

Chola incident was real. It literally started with a scuffle and fistfight and ended with like 2 PLA soldiers dying. Over the years the Indians inflate the story and the total PLA KIA now stands at 400 with compound interest/inflation of around 20 percent per year.
 
. . .
Don't argue with Pakistanis on this thread of Rezang la warriors(who were respected even by Chinese soldiers, they kneeled down to salute these brave guys). They(Pakistanis ) haven't heard 'bravery' word,all they have heard about is 'surrender'(on 16th Dec 1971)
 
.
I did some research on Rezang La (热赞拉) battle on both Chinese and English media. Here is what I found

Indian side: Chinese casualties ranging for "estimate close to 500 dead and wounded" to "at least 1300 killed". Understandable, because the area was under PLA control after battle.

Chinese side: Indian casualties are consistent with India's numbers. I did not find total Chinese casualty. It is one of more difficult battles during Sino-India conflict, but it did not appear that PLA suffered unusually high casualty in this particular battle. PLA did give Indian dead soldiers the military salute at burial ceremony.
 
Last edited:
.
Don't argue with Pakistanis on this thread of Rezang la warriors(who were respected even by Chinese soldiers, they kneeled down to salute these brave guys). They(Pakistanis ) haven't heard 'bravery' word,all they have heard about is 'surrender'(on 16th Dec 1971)

you have only this 71 thing to brag about? A country much smaller then u already fighting civil war for a year against millions of hostile countrymen who were helping 300k guerrilla forces of mukti attacked and outnumbered by indian army with 1:15 ratio according to manekshaw, pathetic now compare your malunutrationed army's performence against an equal China in 62, they were not able to make a single stand against them. :rofl:

and this 71 comes after when your impotenet leaders realize that they cant defeat much smaller Pakistan in fair fights like 48[in which Pakistan won Gilgit and Azad Kashmir] and 65 [draw a war with much bigger enemy] hence those bastards use terrorism and exploit cultural/ethnic differences [in a territory far from west Pakistan].

Not to forget the same army who surrender it have humilated your shupa looser army of in 2002 stand off when ur impotent leaders were not able dare enter Pakistani territory and lost more then 1800 soldiers , maybe bcoz they failed to find any proxy who can fight a year long civil war against Pakistan.. In past Your malnutrationed army needed a year civil war to enter Pakistani territory, but after nuke saga this too seems impossible.

thats why now we see bharti disappointed with modi and looking for Trump to move against Pakistan.
 
. .
Stories are just stories. Its entirely inconsistent with the numbers involved since it is literally higher than the entire wars. Its not that hard to understand that a single battles casualties can not be higher than a wars casualties.

Also its impossible to count casualties after getting completely wiped out from an area. Only victors can count bodies as they are the ones alive to do so. The entire area was under Chinese control after the battle.
 
.
The winners write the history books and losers cry about it on forums like these for years to come, There's no question the soldiers displayed huge bravery that day in face of overwhelming odds and zero help from outside but the facts do seem to be exaggerated a bit. This ruins the chances of anyone recognizing and praising their courage.

We should accept what happened in 1962 and learn from it, not become like most of the people here who don't and cannot be made to believe that Pakistan didn't achieve its objectives in 48,65,99 and take 71 defeat as simply a civil war.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom