If I were to use your language: "Only an evil person with negative mindset would think that someone would rejoice when someone else's raw nerve is touched".
You sure? Under the these circumstances?
What the hell is a fairer sex?
You are beating around the bush for answering a simple question with a 'yes' or 'no'. Actually, you did say 'yes' before the direct question was put forth. But after the direct question, you are trying to deflect in not so intelligent a manner.
If it was a matter of yes or no one wouldnt be bothered to giving you a
FULL explanation! Which of course is meaningless when you didnt read it! Instead of being grateful you ungrateful soul keep being like spoilt child with your I want a yes or no not a whole explanation of how the Yes or No can be derived!
You having your own opinion & interpretation is fine but thinking that everyone should have the same line of thought, is illogical and not so intelligent.
Likewise when you just think that it falls in yes and no..
[A 'complete code of life' cannot exclude enemies from 'how to treat' list anyway. Otherwise, it will not be complete.]
A complete code of life not of spoon feeding...If spoon feeding was needed one would be bothered to maintain a brain!
Two different people considering their own interpretation as right while being mentally incapable of knowing that there are other possible interpretations.
Or 1 stubborn person
wanting to hear only a specific word or someone agreeing to him but isnt hearing it hence twists, whines and stamps his foot where he has no argument left!
When a verse (or instruction) is interpreted differently by different people, it is not entirely the people's fault.
It is esp when there is already a verse stating ask ALLAH for help and Prophet said when you are lost go to the people of knowledge not your backyard Mullah whom everyone knows was appointed coz his dad too was a Mullah and before that his dad and so on....In fact in the Quran it is said people prefer that which their forefathers did (appoint the backyard Mullah and his generations)
Why are they not adhering to the warning? If they did adhere to the warning and then their life screwed up then maybe you CAN NOT blame the people
If the scholars had said "it is forbidden to mistreat any human being", there was no scope for different interpretations.
But when they said "it is forbidden to mistreat A & B", they have obviously left the treatment of C & D to interpretation.
1st it is more serious than mistreating: It has been said to kill 1 SOUL/ MAN (irrespective of religion, race, colour, or whatever you want to add) is like killing the whole of mankind.....Yet people kill ...Even when the verse covers A-Z and everything else....You tell me is D enough if it was written until D, then next someone starts worshiping the sea monster, and there isnt a name yet given to such people then your question would be why were they excluded?
Man's nature to find keeray where they are not even present! Anything so that they dont have to agree with the other person! Anything and everything looks faulty!
You can equate C & D to grandparents but be aware that it is your own interpretation. And there are other interpretations possible.
THAT is your problem ALONE!